4

Now, I know that the Wampa scene was apparently introduced to account for Hamill's changed nose from his recent car accident but it does seem possible that after the Bacta tank treatment and some other Medical Droid attention, he was completely healed of them, then why isn't this the case with Anakin? Did he just think that the scar looked cool and leave it there?

enter image description here

enter image description here

Edit: Apparently the wampa scene was written even before the accident, so it really is possible to heal very deep scars in the galaxy far, far away, which makes me wonder why Anakin (and then Vader) still had theirs.

  • 1
    For the same reason as here and here? – Gallifreyan Jan 2 '17 at 17:41
  • 2
    Also Darth Vader has much more extensive scarring than here. – Gallifreyan Jan 2 '17 at 17:45
  • 2
    It just ocurred to me that maybe Anakin being a Jedi at that point was the biggest reason, to heal scars would be to be vain and to want to preserve one's looks, Luke wasn't a fully fledged Jedi when he got scarred so he obviously had no issue with healing his face. – Neo Herakles Jan 2 '17 at 17:54
  • Also, because he's a schmuck. – Gallifreyan Jan 2 '17 at 18:33
  • 2
    Because chicks dig scars. – Valorum Jan 2 '17 at 19:18
6

The film's official novelisation indicates that he may have intentionally kept it in order to provide himself with a constant reminder not to become complacent.

She reached up to the burn-scar high on his cheek. “You were hurt...”

“Nothing serious,” he said with half a smile. “Just an unfriendly reminder to keep up with my lightsaber practice.”

Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith - Official Novelisation

  • In Legends, Jedi Master Even Piell also kept his one eye for a similar reason as a reminder. – Thunderforge Apr 23 '17 at 9:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.