In Star Trek TNG episode s7e18, "Eye of the Beholder", Deanna, Geordi and Worf are solving a mystery in the starboard nacelle. Behind a panel there is something that Geordi calls the "main ODN line". So, what's that thingy then, and why does it run in the nacelle?

Geordi examining the ODN line Here's Geordi examining behind the panel. That's the ODN line then, I guess.

Finally, does anyone know what ODN stands for? Sometimes these acronyms have funny origins.


3 Answers 3


From the Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual

Optical Data Network (ODN).

Data transmission is accomplished with a network of multiplexed optical mono-crystal microfibers. A series of five redundant major optical trunks link the two main computer cores in the primary hull, and an additional set of trunks link these to the third core in the engineering section. Any individual trunk is designed to be able to handle the total data load of the ship's basic operating systems. Major ODN trunks also provide information links to the 380 optical subprocessors located throughout the ship. These subprocessors improve system response time by distributing system load and provide a measure of redundancy in case of major system failure. From these subprocessors, additional ODN links connect to each individual control panel or display surface. Two secondary optical data networks provide protected linkages to key systems and stations; these backup systems are physically separated from the primary system and from each other.

and from the Star Trek Encyclopedia

Acronym for optical data network. A system of fiber-optic data-transmission conduits used aboard Federation starships, serving as the nervous system of the ship's computer network.

In short, it's a series of interconnected cables that allows hardline communication between the ship's various systems.

  • 1
    I like the manual explains the Techno Babble (TV Tropes warning) with more techno babble.
    – jpmc26
    Jan 24, 2017 at 21:56
  • 3
    @jpmc26 - The correct term is treknobabble :-)
    – Valorum
    Jan 24, 2017 at 22:01
  • 7
    Aside from the references to the hull and ODN in general, the terminology is pretty much real world. Trunk, subprocessors, etc.
    – Logarr
    Jan 24, 2017 at 22:52
  • 1
    @Logarr And "optical networking" is standard as well. Jan 25, 2017 at 3:05
  • 2
    @RoguePlanetoid - Star Trek has alway been ahead of the curve with regard to new (real world) technology. That's why it's such a damm shame that the last and next series' are based in the past, compared to DS9 and Voyager given that they'll be so heavily constrained in what new tech they can introduce.
    – Valorum
    Jan 25, 2017 at 9:08

The ODN line is the Optical Data Network line. The initialism is expanded in the TNG technical manual. All the data for computer control and monitoring of the nacelle will run through there back to the shipboard network and to the main computers.

Unfortunately, there's no fun origin story or cute meaning for this one. I imagine that an optical network was chosen both in-universe and out because fiberoptic links are incredibly fast and high bandwidth, and therefore suitable for carrying the massive amount of data generated and consumed by a starship and its inhabitants. They have been used for many years in networking and telecommunications.

  • 1
    Optical transmission is also much more resistant to EM interference.
    – ench
    Jan 25, 2017 at 16:22
  • 1
    @ench That too. Very useful in all sorts of settings. Starting up a fluorescent light or a big motor can cause electrical interference. Who knows what kind of interference a force field or warp coil might put out. Better to use optical connections.
    – Dranon
    Jan 25, 2017 at 16:32

The ODN is the Optical Data Network, and runs alongside the EPS (ElectroPlasma System) to all computerized systems on the ship.

Every control panel, light fixture, and warp nacelle has an ODN connector, which the computer uses to command and control the device.

When Geordi says that he's working on the "Main ODN Line," he's referring to a trunk line which travels from the main shipboard network to the nacelles. This would collect data from the nacelles and dump it on the network, and collect data from the network and dump it to the nacelles.

The problem here is that it's now a single point of failure; the point of the ODN was to have multiple pathways for data to travel around the network. For example, there was a direct line between Main Engineering and the Engineering station on the bridge (TNG The N'th Degree), and likely many more direct access links to avoid network congestion.

One thing that many people don't realize, because it's not brought up much on the show, is that the Enterprise doesn't just have one Big Iron Computer mainframe. It has three mainframes, all linked to each other, running inside warp fields to process data faster, and many hundreds of subprocessors and microcomputers all linked to each other via the ODN. This required MASSIVE amounts of bandwidth to coordinate. (Star Trek TNG Technical Manual)

Two more things:

First off, it appears that the ODN carried data with high powered lasers, or else the sheer amount of data being pumped caused the fiber optic cables to carry a huge amount of energy, as ODN relays and lines were known to explode, not usually considered a failure mode of optical fibers.

Secondly, there was also a radio-based network available used for communicators and PADDs, kinda like Wi-Fi, many many years before Wi-Fi was ever a thing. In TOS, communicators were like telephones; you called into the Communications station/department, and had your call routed, or you could select a destination on the intercom. Starting in TNG, all communicator communication was point-to-point over the radio network; this network not only connected mobile devices inside the ship, but also from ship to shore and ship to ship, with automatic call routing. This radio network could also be used as a backup for the ODN, but it didn't carry nearly as much bandwidth as the ODN.

Interestingly enough, this implied "radio data network" is only mentioned in the Technical Manual and in Star Trek TNG novels... I can't think of any on-screen appearances of anyone using the radio network as a backup or as a component of some problem solving technobabble.

  • 1
    Are you sure it was the ODNs exploding? All the explosions I saw were EPS conduits and the like.
    – user11521
    Jan 25, 2017 at 4:02
  • 1
    I remember in ’87 we joked that the Enterprise crew finally got the network working. That was just becoming a thing for desktop PCs at the time and it was full of problems.
    – JDługosz
    Jan 25, 2017 at 5:16
  • 1
    A main trunk isn't necessarily a single point of failure. We have "main trunks" connecting countries and cities in our own Internet, but them failing would just result in a huge drop in bandwidth, not failure. If that's still enough to run the critical stuff they're fine.
    – Phoshi
    Jan 25, 2017 at 9:46
  • 1
    @AakashM afaik no episode really discussed this feature; it was buried in the Technical Manual as an explanation for how the mainframes were so fast; a small static warp field basically accelerated the time reference in the core. I only remember one episode where the computer, itself, was a character: Evolution with the nanites in TNG. I agree it would have been a great story point to have this system malfunction, but the "computer" seems to usually assumed to always work; replicators, transporters, and holodecks fail, but the computer is always around.
    – Zoey Green
    Jan 25, 2017 at 15:46
  • 1
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit that's an interesting idea, but the warp core doesn't have a "fundamental frequency" AFAIK. The actual power output can vary wildly. The warp core creates ElectroPlasma (an energetic matter stream) which goes through the EPS; the EPS converts EP to electricity in substations around the ship, which if they are AC their frequencies might not sync. Clocks on the Enterprise are synced with the Federation Timebase Beacons, and probably use something like modern NTP to sync subprocessors.
    – Zoey Green
    Jan 25, 2017 at 16:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.