7

Besides the book Brave New World itself, are there any sources, interviews or quotes from the author himself —Aldous Huxley — explaining more about the world and characters of this book?

I'm not asking about his interpretations or the views he wanted to expose in Brave New World, but about the setting itself, like the Letters of J.R.R Tolkien where he explains more about his legendarium or J.K.Rowling's Pottermore. So I want to know if there is some "Word of God" (warning: TVTropes) about the Brave New World universe, instead of interpretations and speculations by people other than the author.

I tried to find it online, but with no success. I only found these videos, but for what I got (I'm not a native English speaker, so the videos without subtitles are hard) in these he is speaking about the themes of the book regarding the real world — but I'm a damned nerd, I want to learn more about Brave New World universe and not about the real-life implications of his writings.

  • 3
    He wrote a follow-up. Basically 12 essays detailing his (challenging) views on overpopulation and genetic manipulation; Brave New World Revisited. – Valorum Feb 19 '17 at 21:58
  • 2
    Well, not sure if it is a recommended reading, I want to know if the author himself said about the setting. Is it off-topic? And if is it off-topic, may be this question is on-topic in the Literature StackExchange site? – Brian Hellekin Feb 19 '17 at 22:16
  • 6
    @Valorum, I'm not sure if this is really a request for recommended reading, not in the usual broad sense ("I like these works, what other works will I like?"). Especially with the comparison to Pottermore and Tolkien's Letters, I think this should be on topic. – SQB Feb 19 '17 at 22:42
  • 1
    @SQB - It's an edge case, certainly. I've dumped it into the queue and I shall abide by the will of the community, – Valorum Feb 19 '17 at 22:54
  • 2
    I'll agree with Brian Hellekin, here -- I think this is closer to asking if something exists for Brave New World that is equivalent to what the Rivan Codex is to David Edding's Belgariad, The Malloreon and the two stand-alone books, Belgarath the Sorcerer and Polgara the Sorceress. – K-H-W Feb 20 '17 at 2:33
3

In short: No.

Aldous Huxley made clear in several of his subsequent writings that he was not very interested in fleshing out the setting he had created in Brave New World. As time passed, he was much more interested in seeing how the real world had developed, contrary to his expectations; and in considering how he could have written Brave New World differently.

Much of my discussion here will be based on Huxley's comments in his collection of essays, "Brave New World Revisited," from 1958, twenty-six years after the publication of Brave New World. The purpose of the collection was to given his then-current thinking about many of the issues that he had raised in the novel. In general, the essays are quite pessimistic about the future. When he wrote the Brave New World, Huxley thought that a sea change in the nature of human culture would be required in order for the dystopia he envisioned to take hold; but by 1958, he thought that dystopia could actually be a natural outgrowth of the changes that had overtaken the world in the twentieth century. (The whole thing makes for very interesting reading. While I disagree with Huxley on many points, he clearly has put a great deal of thought into the questions at hand.)

One thing that is immediately evident from reading "Brave New World Revisited," is that Huxley was framing the essays entirely based on his personal recollection of the novel. Not only does he not always have a crystal clear idea of how things worked in the setting he had created, he does not care; in fact, he did not even bother to reread or consult Brave New World to get details of the setting accurate. In the very first essay ("Over-Population"), the author indicates that he does not remember how far in the future the novel takes place:

I for­get the exact date of the events recorded in Brave New World; but it was somewhere in the sixth or seventh century A.F. (After Ford)

He later gives other details that similarly indicate he is working purely from the memory of what he had written a couple decades earlier.

In the Brave New World of my fable, the problem of human numbers in their relation to natural resources had been effectively solved. An optimum figure for world population had been calculated and numbers were maintained at this figure (a little under two bil­lions, if I remember rightly) generation after genera­tion.

Careful world-building was not Huxley's way. In this 1960 interview with The Paris Review, he explains that he largely makes up his plots as he goes along (including the plot of Brave New World), without mapping things out extensively in advance. Moreover, he writes and edits one full chapter at a time, minimizing the need to go back and re-analyze what is already effectively finished.

I work away a chapter at a time, finding my way as I go. I know very dimly when I start what’s going to happen. I just have a very general idea, and then the thing develops as I write. Sometimes—it’s happened to me more than once—I will write a great deal, then find it just doesn’t work, and have to throw the whole thing away. I like to have a chapter finished before I begin on the next one. But I’m never entirely certain what’s going to happen in the next chapter until I’ve worked it out. Things come to me in driblets, and when the driblets come I have to work hard to make them into something coherent.

Finally, in the foreword to his final novel Island, Aldous Huxley indicated that, since the publication of Brave New World, he had decided he should have created a different setting instead:

If I were now to rewrite the book, I would offer the Savage a third alternative. Between the Utopian and primitive horns of his dilemma would lie the possibility of sanity.... In this community economics would be decentralist and Henry-Georgian, politics Kropotkinesque and co-operative. Science and technology would be used as though, like the Sabbath, they had been made for man, not (as at present and still more so in the Brave New World) as though man were to be adapted and enslaved to them. Religion would be the conscious and intelligent pursuit of man's Final End, the unitive knowledge of immanent Tao or Logos, the transcendent Godhead or Brahman. And the prevailing philosophy of life would be a kind of Higher Utilitarianism, in which the Greatest Happiness principle would be secondary to the Final End principle -- the first question to be asked and answered in every contingency of life being: 'How will this thought or action contribute to, or interfere with, the achievement, by me and the greatest possible number of other individuals, of man's Final End?'

  • Nice, answer, thanks for it! But this is an unfortunate news, since now it would be not possible to get canon answers for any doubts about the Brave New World... – Brian Hellekin Dec 31 '17 at 2:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.