I seem to recall a "Phantom Edit" version of Star Wars Episode I being created by fans in the wake of disappointment in the movie. Did this continue through the prequels, or did this practice stop?

If the entire prequel trilogy didn't get "Phantom Edited", why? Did LucasArts attempt to quash this movement, or did a lack of fan interest in remaking the prequels halt the progress?

  • 3
    I hadn't heard of this. I'd always wondered why people didn't go back and create their own prequels using the material given in the EU about that time period. A "fan fiction" prequel series wouldn't have to be very good to be miles better than the actual prequel series. Feb 1, 2011 at 20:26
  • 4
    – Sinan
    Jul 29, 2011 at 10:42

4 Answers 4


While Mike Nichols two edits are the most famous fanedits of the Prequel Trilogies, they are dozens upon dozens of Star Wars fanedits and many of them push the level of improvement and visual quality far beyond what Nichols achieved. Most faneditors focus on the Prequels, but some have ventured into the Original Trilogoy. There are over 60 Star Wars fanedits, and they can be found www.Fanedit.org, which is a site where faneditors of all kinds of movies (not just Star Wars) come to discuss and list fanedits.

For a list of all Star Wars fanedits, their Star Wars page is a great resource. In the interest of full disclosure, I'm a faneditor who has released edits of Episode I: Shadow of the Sith and Episode II The Republic Divided, and have Episode III in the works.

There are many fantastic edits out there, with a variety of approaches, due to the sheer volume of Star Wars fans out there with their own visions of how to improve the Prequel Trilogy.

Regarding your follow-up question about how Fanedit.org rates fanedits; the basic process is that anyone who has an account on the site is able to rate the edit (on a scale of 1-10 stars) and are encouraged to provide a written review. First time editors must have their first edit 'approved' in order to be formally listed on the site.

Reviewers are encouraged to evaluate the edit on both technical merit (are the edits seamless or jarring? Is the audio smooth or abrupt? How does the video quality compare to the original etc..) and terms of story (did the editor improve the story/film-watching experience? Did they try something bold and original?)

Currently the site does not provide a side-by-side comparison of each set (all Epiosode I edits, all Episode II edits etc) but there is a greatest Star Wars fanedit page, all edits on this page have received at minimum 5 votes averaging 8.3 or greater, or at least 10 votes averaging 8.0 or greater.

Due to their fame and history, Mike Nichols edits have the highest score of any traditional style edit for episodes I and II, although most familiar with the full spectrum of SW fanedits will admit they are both outdated, particularly Episode I, plus many gripe about his non-cannon style opening crawl which is a letter instead of a set-up.

Excluding Mike Nichols' work, these are some of the top rated for each episode:

Episode I

  1. Attack of the Federation : 8.76 (by faneditor JasonN)
  2. Shadow of the Sith : 8.47 (by L8wrtr)
  3. A Vergence in the Force : 8.08 (by ADigitalMan)

Episode II

  1. The Republic Divided (by L8wrtr) : 8.82
  2. Attack of the Clones - The Spence Cut (by Spence) : 8.6
  3. Path to the Dark Side - The Diamond Cut (by Diamond Wan) : 8

Episode III

Three edits deserve extra special attention in my opinion:

  1. War of the Stars: A New Hope Grindhouse by The Man Behind the Mask (8.79 score). This is a mind-blowing edit of Episode IV. It is the most original, outlandish and bold version of Episode IV. Incorporating deleted footage, alternate sound sources and alternate angles, it creates Star Wars as you've never seen it.

  2. Star Wars Episode IV A New Hope Special Edition Revisited by Adywan (9.93 score). This stunning edit of Episode IV took years to complete and seeks to address the staggering number of flaws that Lucas didn't address in his special edition. From color timing to improved special effects, once you watch this, it becomes your 'go-to' version of Episode IV.

  3. Attack of the Clones: Super 8 cut by Rogue-theX. (9.27 score). Attack of the Clones in 34 minutes, as if it were a super 8 cheap cut of the film. Fun, fast and original.

  • 7
    Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but how does one actually view the edit? Feb 1, 2012 at 23:16
  • 2
    Sadly, the links to fanedit are to locked posts, which you can only see if you are logged in to that site. Jan 23, 2014 at 19:20
  • Even worse, I created an account and logged in, but the site won't let me see the linked posts.
    – Harvey
    Jul 8, 2014 at 20:27
  • FWIW, ifdb.fanedit.org/dote shows that L8wrtr published an updated E3 somewhere around May 2012 (after this post was submitted), getting, arguably, the pole position in fan edits - I would, personally, consider this post in need of a revamp based on this.
    – user24069
    Dec 12, 2016 at 19:33

Wikipedia's "Phantom Edit" page mentions that in addition to Star Wars Episode I.I: The Phantom Edit, there was also an edit of Episode II, re-named Star Wars Episode II.I: Attack of the Phantom. Apparently, since the original release of these edits, the "Phantom Editor" has since been revealed to be Mike J. Nichols. I have not heard of any mention of an Episode III edit.


I think there was only the edit of The Phantom Menace - I'm sure it's still around on some Torrent networks.

Basically, any scene with Jar-Jar was carefully edited to remove this character (along with references to him) - and I think annoying things like Anakin's "yippee" were cut out.

Bear in mind - without access to stored footage, the edit could only cut footage, not introduce new scenes.


There is also a cut called Episode 3.1, available through torrents, which emulates the (never to be released) cut of actor Topher Grace by placing all three movies into a single movie, taking fan editing to a rather enjoyable extreme.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.