In the Return of the King film, Gandalf's staff is destroyed by the Witch-king:

During the battle of the Black Gate he uses his sword, Glamdring.

But at the end of the film, when the hobbits are leaving Middle-earth, he has it back:

Bilbo stands looking out past the viewer; Frodo stands to his right and behind him, looking at Bilbo, with Sam in the mirror position on Bilbo's left.  Merry and Pippin are visible behind the three with Gandalf, in white, in the back holding his staff.

But where did he get it from?

I'm looking for answers ONLY from the films!

  • 1
    Well you answer is here: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/12916/…
    – Edlothiad
    May 4, 2017 at 16:57
  • 4
    Is this answerable? If we disallow the books, then there is no explanation. He has it when he reappears in the Entwood. As far as the comment about not having it at the Black Gate, I am wondering why the OP presumes it is lost instead of stowed with the gear or left at Minas Tirith (etc.)
    – Yorik
    May 4, 2017 at 17:17
  • 1
    ikely an oversight honestly. There were pickups specifically related to the Witch King and the battle that were shot after principal photography. The staff breaking scene was only in the Extended Edition - included after principal photography lotr.wikia.com/wiki/The_Witch-King%27s_Hour_(scene) Ian McKellen also kept a blog regarding shooting dates: mckellen.com/cinema/lotr/wb/index.htm
    – NKCampbell
    May 4, 2017 at 17:24
  • 3
    @NKCampbell - This is the answer. The scene in which his staff is destroyed is only part of the extended Director's chuck-everything-in special cut.
    – Valorum
    May 4, 2017 at 17:59
  • 1
    Valorum is correct. This scene is just an Extended scene which PJ created: about the Witch-king supposedly breaking Gandalf's staff, not when Gandalf loses it at Orthanc. Technically, it never happens in the books.
    – Voronwé
    May 5, 2017 at 13:52

4 Answers 4


While not explicitly answered, there's no reason to believe that he couldn't have simply gotten a new one.

It's clear that he originally got his white staff from somewhere; in the book, it explicitly comes from Lothlórien:

'Thus it was that I came to Caras Galadhon and found you but lately gone. I tarried there in the ageless time of that land where days bring healing not decay. Healing I found, and I was clothed in white.

The Two Towers Book III Chapter 5: "The White Rider"

Though this isn't stated in the films, the visual design of the staff certainly implies it.

Recall also that, in the film, the final scene explicitly takes place about three years after the destruction of the Ring:

Frodo: Thirteen months to the day since Gandalf sent us on our long journey we find ourselves looking upon a familiar sight. We were home.


Frodo: It's been four years to the day since Weathertop, Sam.

Return of the King (2003)

It doesn't seem like a stretch to imagine Gandalf returning to Lórien to get a new staff sometime in those intervening years.

  • You could also mention that the scene in question wasn't in the theatrical release, so maybe it wasn't meant to be in the same continuity as the scene with Cirdan. May 4, 2017 at 17:49
  • @Gallifreyan I considered it, but then I figured it was easier to leave it out then to explain why Gandalf didn't have his staff when he went to save Faramir May 4, 2017 at 17:51

As requested, this answer will be from a film perspective.

This scene is actually an 'Extended scene' of the film: it never happened in the legendarium. When Peter Jackson realised his mistake (explained below), he removed this scene from the actual theatrical version of the film, but it still exists in Extended versions.

The answer (in the theatrical film theory) would be: Gandalf got his staff 'back' because he never lost it in the first place.

Other speculated reasons the scene was added:

  1. Peter Jackson most likely misinterpreted this statement about the Witch-king by Aragorn:

    'Look!' he cried; [...] 'The only hurt that it did to his enemy, I fear; for it is unharmed, but all blades perish that pierce that dreadful King. More deadly to him was the name of Elbereth.'

    The Lord of the Rings - The Fellowship of the Ring: Chapter XII - "Flight to the Ford"

Hence, he depicted Gandalf's staff breaking to show this.

  1. He was also trying to convey the message of how powerful the Witch-king is.

As there were little scenes that show his strength. Adding this scene shows that the Witch-king is powerful enough to break Gandalf's staff in the film — which is completely incorrect and contradicts information in the books.

Peter Jackson realised this later on and hence put the scene where the Witch-king broke Gandalf's staff as an 'Extended scene'.

  • I don't know about Jackson's interpretation, but the last part is most relevant - it's even worth a separate question to ask whether the extended edition is canon at all, from Jackson's perspective. May 5, 2017 at 14:03
  • disagree w/ the first point on a couple of counts. 1) a staff does not equal a blade. 2) the staff didn't touch, certainly did not pierce the Witch-King. 3) they demonstrated piercing blades w/ Pippin and Eowyn
    – NKCampbell
    May 5, 2017 at 14:10
  • I have re-labelled the point as 'speculated'. Does that make more sense now?
    – Voronwé
    May 5, 2017 at 14:21
  • 1
    Nah, I realized it was speculation originally. I think it's just not a valid speculation :) - no hard feelings. I'll pull back the downvote because overall I think you're right (so I'm happy I said it first in the comments! :D )
    – NKCampbell
    May 5, 2017 at 14:43

I know you are only interested in the movies, but they provide no explanation. For those who come across this and are interested in what the books say:

The Witch-king and Gandalf never came to clash directly during the battle of Minas Tirith.

They came close, facing each other, trading words and the Witch-king taunts Gandalf — which is essentially the dialog used in the movie. But before they actually clash, they are interrupted by horns as the army of Rohan arrives, after which the Witch-king retreats to face the new threat. So there is never a show of force by either party to reveal who is the most powerful — Éowyn kills the Witch-king shortly after he faced Gandalf.

The scene where the Witch-king easily dismisses Gandalf by breaking his staff effortlessly is entirely made-up by Peter Jackson and not canonical. Like every other 'Hollywood' scene Jackson made up entirely by himself, it is a quite random and pointless.

If they had come to a clash, Gandalf is a powerful Maia, who recently had his powers boosted further, wielding an ancient elven sword and a ring of power.

The prophecy of the Witch-king foretold that he could be slain by no man. Being a Maia, Gandalf is not a 'man' (human), just like Merry was not a 'man' — which is the explanation Tolkien provides for Merry being able to stand up to the Witch-king and assist Éowyn in slaying him.

So I think that if they were to fight, the odds would be heavily in Gandalf's favour.

Also in the books, Gandalf and Elrond together do defeat all of the Nine, including the Witch-king, when they try to cross the river to Rivendell. Using their combined magic power, including two eleven rings of power used at once.

So just as Arwen wouldn't be able to defeat all of the Nazgûl with a flick of the wrist, the Witch-king wouldn't be able to defeat Gandalf with a flick of the wrist either. It's all made up by Peter Jackson.

  • I think this answer would be better if you were to edit out some of the related commentary. At least to my reading of it quite a large portion just seems tangential to the question.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    Nov 2, 2018 at 19:42
  • Don't get me wrong, I like the books more than the films. But some film changes are better than the novel itself. ;) Nov 3, 2018 at 14:30
  • "The scene where the Witch-king easily dismisses Gandalf by breaking his staff effortlessly is entirely made-up by Peter Jackson and not canonical." — it's probably a reference to the scene where Gandalf effortlessly breaks Saruman's staff (which was cut from the theatrical release though), which was in the books.
    – user28434
    Jan 15 at 9:43
  • "Using their combined magic power, including two eleven rings of power used at once." - now who's entirely making stuff up that is not canonical?
    – OrangeDog
    Jan 15 at 9:56
  • @OrangeDog How did you propose that they did it then, by blowing up a dam using dynamite?
    – Amarth
    Jan 19 at 16:20

In response to those who mention the use of the Elven rings, Gandalf's and Elrond's, in the War of the Ring - No. There was too much danger in doing so. Only Galadriel, hidden from the Eye in Lothlorien, wore her ring regularly,and may well have stopped doing so not long after the Farewell to Lorien. Both Elrond and Gandalf may have worn them and used them to good purpose BEFORE Sauron rose again, but once the ring-bearer was out of sight on his journey to Mordor with Sam, Elrond and Mithrandir both would have removed and hidden their rings, as, should Sauron reclaim the One, their minds would immediately have been open to him, and he could have mastered them through his control of the Elven rings. The danger was too great.

  • 2
    Hi, welcome to SF&F. Please note that the question was only about how Gandalf got a replacement staff in the extended director's cut of the movies. This discussion of the Three is really a comment on another answer, and shouldn't be posted as an answer. You might want to take the tour.
    – DavidW
    Jan 15 at 2:36
  • Also, ever since Sauron lost his Ring, the Three have not been idle, but used. Jan 15 at 2:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.