For maybe the first time, I'm more interested in a real-world answer. In-universe, all that can really be said is that those "godlike" beings do exist, and Kirk and company crossed paths with them quite often.

Out of universe, was this a favorite "angle" of Gene Roddenberry and the other writers? Godlike beings in TOS seem to appear every other episode (Apollo, Melkotians, Trelane, Metrons, Organians, Guardian of Forever, "Shore Leave" aliens, Gary Mitchell, Thasians and Charlie Evans, Excalbians, Companion, Redjac, etc., etc.).

  • 7
    It could just be a direct expression of Clarke's Third Law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Or godhood, if you prefer. The Federation is already amazingly potent by our standards. Superluminal travel, time travel, replicators, human level artificial intelligence, truth machines, etc. Anyone with technology that could impress them is going to look godlike to us. So if the Federation is only a middling level civilization, they are going to run into a lot of "gods" when they start exploring. The plethora of stories naturally falls out of that logic.
    – Kyle Jones
    Jun 17, 2017 at 3:53

1 Answer 1


Most likely it was indeed. It seems that Roddenberry took a dim view of most theistic beliefs, much as quite a few other humanists have done. Here is a select quote attributed to Gene Roddenberry — culled from the Wikiquote page, I must admit.

I think I’ve gone through quite an ordinary series of steps in life. I began as most children began, with God and Santa Claus and the tooth fairy and the Easter Bunny all being about the same thing. Then I went through the things that I think sensitive people go through, wrestling with the thoughts of Jesus—did he shit? Did he screw? I began to dare to believe that God wasn’t some white beard. I began to look upon the miseries of the human race and to think God was not as simple as my mother said. As nearly as I can concentrate on the question today, I believe I am God; certainly you are, I think we intelligent beings on this planet are all a piece of God, are becoming God. In some sort of cyclical non-time thing we have to become God, so that we can end up creating ourselves, so that we can be in the first place. ... My own feeling is that relation to God as a person is a petty, superstitious approach to the All, the infinite.

As quoted in God & (1975) by Terrance A. Sweeney

So far as Roddenberry's personal beliefs, whether described as atheism or pantheism, were concerned, that quote really exemplifies, I think, the characteristics we see with all the gods and god-like beings featured in the episodes of Star Trek. It appears to me that the idea was to portray that being seen as a god, or god-like, does not necessitate such an entity genuinely be omnipotent, omniscient, or perfectly wise, et al.

  • 1
    Yeah, I'm really not interested in why others don't believe in God. I personally think that it's obvious that God must exist, but anyway. I want to know why there are so many godlike beings in TOS. Perhaps Roddenberry's atheism had something to do with it, and a quote from him or one of the writers would help. Jun 17, 2017 at 1:42
  • Apparently I do need to edit, as @T-1000'sSon also was confused. Okay, give me a few minutes… Jun 17, 2017 at 1:48
  • 2
    There's another angle to this, and I don't have time to look up support material, but if you want to, feel free to use this (especially if you can find support). Roddenberry liked to put the crew up against an "invincible" antagonist since it seemed to him to be the "ultimate threat." Then, of course, their victory was even greater when they find that one fatal flaw.
    – Tango
    Jun 17, 2017 at 14:27
  • @Tango Would be better if that were presented in a different answer. It actually sounds more likely. I've never read any such quote, though, so I'd have no inroads on that. Jul 1, 2017 at 12:29
  • I think I read it in Harlan Ellison's book about the making of City on the Edge of Forever. If I had a source, I'd use it.
    – Tango
    Jul 2, 2017 at 17:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.