As Daenerys lands at Dragonstone, it is a deserted place. Cersei could have captured the place or even destroyed it with wildfire. She already knew Dany was coming and she would station most probably at Dragonstone.

  • I went through a similar thought process when watching the episode. There's only one reason I can think of to leave Dragonstone deserted, and that is that if you think the enemy fleet will land there, whoever holds the castle will likely be slaughtered (and Cersei needs all the allies she can muster). But that's more than made up for by the fact that that sacrificial lord is your early warning system, if he can get a raven out. Plus, making some peon a lord and giving him Dragonstone would get you other benefits as well. Leaving it deserted just gives your enemy a new stronghold. Stupid! – PlutoThePlanet Jul 21 '17 at 18:54


Actually no.

The analysis shown by TV show is wrong.

Jaime says Daenerys will land most probably on Dragonstone because of Deep water ports. That doesn't make any military sense, I'll explain why:

  1. The closest Westerosi port from Meereen is Planky town.
  2. It is a major port of Westeros and trading hub so naturally has Deep-Water ports.
  3. Dragonstone is very far up North, right in front of the King's Landing.
  4. The Dornish are Targaryen allies.
  5. The Tyrells, other Targaryen allies, border the Dornish.
  6. Two highways go from Dorne to KL. One from Prince's pass and one from the Boneway.

So Planky Town should have been the most obvious choice for landing zone.

Timing is everything in the war, Daenerys should have chosen the closest friendly port for landing which is Planky Town. She could easily land there, get her armies together, plan her moves, in a friendly port rather than sailing to parts unknown where she might fact resistance.

Dragonstone is a desolate rock with no strategic advantage other than presenting a base for a naval blockade of King's Landing. And it is very much up north, Why take the risk of maritime travel in notoriously stormy Narrow sea in Winter? Targaryen troops are most vulnerable when embarked.

Daenerys needed to connect with her allies. Those are Dornish and Tyrells. The Starry Sept, most prestigious sept in the country since destruction of Sept of Baelor is located in Old Town on Tyrell-Martell border. Aegon the Conqueror himself was crowned there. Daenerys could have done the same. A formal coronation and anointation to match unanointed Cersei would have been huge.

But because D&D wanted an emotional scene, they took Dany back to her birthplace and ancient seat of Targaryens. Reeeeeeeeeeee!


Now that my rant is over, coming back to your original question and playing along with D&D's rules, it would be because any resistance there would have been futile.

Crown did not have a Navy since the Battle of Blackwater bay. Who was going to ferry the occupation troops? There are no funds to raise new fleet anyways, The crown is bankrupt, the Lannister coffers are empty and the Ironbank is pissed because of Crown defaulting on Robert's debts.

And even if they somehow ferried troops across the gullet, to what end?

There would have been no prospect of relief once Daenerys had landed at Dragonstone and the men sent there would have been lost, men who would be needed to defend King's Landing in the coming weeks.

So it was much better to conserve your strength, let Daenerys take Dragonstone as there wasn't much they could do about it anyways, and then defend King's Landing, which itself is madness.

An even better approach would have been abandoning King's Landing and retreating to Casterly Rock. Visenya Targaryen took a look at the rock and thanked God that Lannisters had chosen to fight in the field instead of falling back to their great castle. But abandoning KL means abandoning the throne as well. There isn't much hope for Lannister cause anyways, what remains is, how much can they salvage from the situation?

As for destroying Dragonstone, cui bono? Who benefits? And not to mention, it is unlikely Cersei has that much Wildfire left, if any, or means to transport it to Dragonstone.

| improve this answer | |
  • 7
    As to your 'rant' section, I think it was in keeping with Danerys character to return 'home', I think you're right and it was not a military decision. But at the same time, I didn't find it particularly jarring. It made sense in the context of the character. ;) – Digitalsa1nt Jul 20 '17 at 10:37
  • 1
    Again I'm 50/50 with you there, throughout the character development I agree that she has become more of a 'calculating monarch' in her approach to war and diplomacy (Which is evident form her taking council from her followers seriously), however it has always been evident through that she is prone to being driven by emotion, empathy etc. Rather than logical calculation. Yes this has been less and less evident the further she's progressed, but it is still an aspect of her character, right up until the last episode. =) – Digitalsa1nt Jul 20 '17 at 10:43
  • She's also learned a bit about the trappings of power, and of people's respect for tradition. While she overrides this when she feels appropriate, she doesn't ignore it entirely. Dragonstone is her ancestral seat of power, and is a safe place (the only major navies on Westeros are those of Tyrell and Greyjoy) to build a base surrounded only by those she trusts. Westeros is alien to her, and Dragonstone is a place where she can be in absolute control. – Samthere Jul 20 '17 at 11:10
  • 1
    @Aegon She can't land immediately on King's Landing and be in control; she'll have to fight a war to get there. She doesn't know the Dornish, only Varys. Dorne is filled with Westerosi with their own lives, traditions, heirarchies, et cetera. I'm not saying it would be a bad move for her to go there, just that there would be a lot of politics to navigate. On Dragonstone, the only people there are those she brought with her, who she already knows, rules and trusts. She may wish to make her plans from her own base, not as a guest in somebody else's. – Samthere Jul 20 '17 at 11:29
  • 1
    @Aegon Additionally, she's planning a military takeover of Westeros, starting from Dragonstone, with three dragons. It can't hurt that Westeros remembers Aegon's conquest, and will see parallels. – Samthere Jul 20 '17 at 11:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.