Why do star ships employ evasive maneuvers when engaging in battle? Can't targeting systems easily pinpoint targets travelling at non-warp speeds?

  • There are a number of weapons we see miss on screen. In particular, non-beam phasers and disruptors as well as many torpedoes have fixed trajectories but finite speed, so you can evade.
    – Raphael
    May 17, 2012 at 1:12

7 Answers 7


There are a number of tactical reasons why evasive maneuvers of starships provide an advantage during a battle.

Location of enemy ship weapons arrays

Cardassian Galor Class

enter image description here

The Cardassian Galor class vessel is a good example. Technologically the Cardassians are a ways behind that of the Federation, however they make up for this in battle through numbers. The Cardassian society (Pre-Dominion War) was highly militaristic and had a much larger standing navy during peace time than the Federation. Their vessels have a primary disruptor weapon directly in front which can cause devastation to targets directly in front. They are nearly harmless when approaching from the aft section however as they do not have sophisticated weaponry at that location.

A good evasive maneuver against a Cardassian Galor style cruiser would be to try and get behind it or flank it.

Romulans have a similar style vessel with the War Bird, although they have significantly more weaponry than most other vessels.

enter image description here

The Federation Galaxy Class ship has powerful phaser banks that give a much wider angle of attack making this a significant concern for many combatants.

enter image description here

Avoiding exposure of weaknesses in shields, hull and warp nacelles

Deflector shields are not as powerful on all sides of the ship equally, and other exposed weaknesses like the port nacelles on the Galaxy class or Constitution class vessel leave certain vessels particularly vulnerable to specific attack patterns.

This was demonstrated in Star Trek Generations when a single Klingon Bird of Prey exhibited a surprise attack against the Enterprise-D, a Galaxy Class vessel, which should have more than outmatched the relatively tiny Bird of Prey. The vessel was incapacitated and later crash landed on the planet below.

Evasive manuevers are very important to avoid exposing your vulnerable components to the line of the fire of the enemy.

  • 1
    Very good answer, thank you. I never considered the position of the weapons array or the areas of the ship that are damaged.
    – Sam152
    May 16, 2012 at 14:46
  • 25
    The reason the Bird of Prey in Generations was able to incapacitate the Enterprise was not the angle of attack, but that they knew the frequency of the Enterprise's shields, so they could fire through the shields at the Enterprise as if the shields weren't there. May 16, 2012 at 14:49
  • 8
    @ChristofferHammarström Yes but consider the battle would have played out very differently if the BoP had attacked Port Forward rather than the engines. It still stands to reason that in a battle situation a Galaxy class ship wants to avoid exposing its critical components to the enemy when possible, especially considering that shields fail either by using a spy to determine the frequency of the deflectors, or by sheilds failing naturally through repeated attacks. May 16, 2012 at 14:56
  • 1
    @maple_shaft: Good point. May 16, 2012 at 15:22
  • 1
    @maple_shaft: The Bird Of Prey did attack from the front. It was the Enterprise turning to get away from them.
    – Bobby
    May 17, 2012 at 18:43

Evasive maneuvering in any form of combat is designed to promote your strengths and to exploit your enemies weaknesses. Nowhere is this more evident in the starship combat of the Star Trek Universe (STU).

Ship combat while resembling the World War Two warships of Earth (on which they were based) has other issues that must be addressed, one of the most important being the three-dimensional field of combat in space:


  • Strength of shields: Not all ships have the same strength of shielding and armor in the same proportions. Again it has more to do with their philosophy of combat how their shields are proportioned. Shields can be given specific recharge rates, have their abilities calibrated for specific weapons, and re-positioned to prevent transport from enemy ships. Shield strength is a primary factor when a ship engages in defensive evasion to ensure damage is spread throughout the shield array.

enter image description here

  • Weapon Range: Defensive maneuvering works to keep the most powerful weapons of the enemy ship out of effective range by adjusting the distances between the two ships. If there is a significant range differential between the two ships, then keeping out of effective targeting, locking or damage range is always in consideration when fighting a much stronger opponent.

enter image description here

  • Speed of ships: Faster ships can be more maneuverable and as a result are able to bring the battle to the enemy targeting weaker shields or undefended weapon systems faster. This is why small ships like the Defiant, armed with powerful weapons and being highly maneuverable were very effective in combat against ships with larger, slower tracking weapons.


  • Arc of Fire: One of the most important aspects of space combat. Ships have surfaces where weapons are mounted. Those weapons can only fire in a predetermined arc. Most ships in the (STU) have limited arcs of fire and those arcs depend on the species and their style of combat. More aggressive races have their arcs facing forward preferring to lead with weapons fire. More defensive designs offer wider arcs or cover more areas with the ability to fire. These are also designs that support more coordinated combat techniques.

enter image description here

  • Damage delivery of weapon systems: More powerful weapons may need more time to bring online or recharge before firing, so many ships have attack, defense and roll patterns that allow those systems to recharge while keeping them safe from attack during that time.
  • Weapon tracking: Though rarely mentioned directly it was apparent that weapons needed to track their targets, so maneuvering the ship to aid in tracking and aligning targets for lock is another factor in evasive maneuvering.

enter image description here

For Example:

  • A ship like the Odyssey Class starship shown below would have an combat profile that stressed maintaining the upper weapon arrays of the ship toward the enemy and attacking from below the enemy since more of its weapons are on the upper surface than on the lower one. It would also prefer to bring the fight to the enemy since most of its weapons are on the forward arc of the ship.
  • Below centerline of the ship are far fewer weapons and these are likely to be fired only when the ship is rolling to allow the upper systems time to recharge, and to keep the shields above the ship as strong as possible. Like a small to midsize ship, it counts on its multiple weapons and shields to damage the enemy as quickly as possible reducing their combat effectiveness.
  • Note it only has two photon torpedo launchers. One for the forward arc and one for the rear arc, so when turning away from the enemy, it uses one of the Federation's more powerful weapons to deter an enemy from wanting to try and follow it directly. While this ship has more forward facing firepower it also includes weapons for side and rear arcs, promoting versatility and a wider range of choices in tactics, especially in coordinating with other ships of its size.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Odyssey Class Starship

  • As always, a more complete and thorough answer than anyone else can hope to achieve :) May 16, 2012 at 17:04
  • Care to link a source for the Odyssey Class starship you've pictured? Can't find it on MA.
    – Iszi
    May 16, 2012 at 20:34
  • Odyssey Class Starship - Star Trek Online Wiki: stowiki.org/U.S.S._Enterprise_(NCC-1701-F). You need to grab the entire link including the parentheses. May 16, 2012 at 20:44

Not all weapons travel at light speed, and as such you can evade weaponry that you can see coming. The primary light-speed weaponry in the star trek universe are lasers, which have been largely abandoned for their issues with piercing a star ship's hull.

According to the Spaceflight Chronology, the invention of advanced ship-mounted laser weaponry was the key technology credited for the victory in the Earth-Romulan War. Laser weaponry was eventually abandoned by Starfleet because while it did penetrate deflector shielding easily, lasers had very little impact force to do actual damage to a hull compared to particle weapons. -- http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Laser_cannon

Other directed energy weapons (primarily particle weapons as indicated in the quote) travel at sub-light speed, meaning their detection is possible before they land, and as such you can actively evade them even if their targeting is accurate.


Standard issue photon torpedoes have mass, so they exhibit inertia. When fired, you can try to avoid them, similarly to guided projectile weapons that are used today in air-to-air or surface-to-air combat.

  • Antimatter has ordinary mass, not "anti-mass". May 16, 2012 at 15:10
  • @KeithThompson: Yes, of course. I should stop writing answers while being distracted.
    – bitmask
    May 16, 2012 at 15:55

In the void of space it would be difficult if not impossible to evade directed energy weapons. Simply put it would be like trying to dodge a flashlight beam. At best, you may be able avoid the beam's path by moving prior to it being turned on. The real question you should be asking is, 'How do these giant starships execute evasive maneuvers in the first place?'

It is established that Warp capable ships power is used to propel its forward movement. Impulse engines do so at far lesser speeds, but still forward. Maneuvering Thrusters move the ship in x,y, and z axis at even lesser speed. So how does a starship 'bank', 'loop' or come to a screeching halt in a vacuum? In a medium such as an atmosphere or liquid such maneuvers are more that possible. A starship just like any body in space has mass and the larger the mass, the more energy it would take to set said mass in motion with a greater amount to change its course.

Thing is whether a beam or projectile weapon, they would go in a straight line one slower than the other. At best, a starship in anticipation of a weapon firing could possibly speed up or slow their motion. Since there is no such thing as 'forward', 'back', 'up' or 'down' in space evasive maneuvers would work to either quickly get beyond the expected attack coordinate or slow down sufficiently in time to not be at the same point when it came.

If anything, interspace war would be more like fighting in a super 3D gravityless chess game where you could move in any direction in a straight line long as you could overcome your own inertia. Now before you say, 'Inertial Dampeners' remember that they are there to counter the effects of the sudden starts and stops from going to Warp or using the Impulse Engines. Which I always thought was odd since a ship 'traveling' in a Warp Bubble isn't actually moving. So since the dampeners aren't there to stop the ship's inertia but to negate the ship's interior inertia, how would a starship really execute evasive maneuvers?

Simple, since you can't bank in space you could stop, change directions or speed up. So the tough thing for both attacker and defender would be to anticipate both potential attack and defensive coordinates prior to an attack. It would resemble 'shotgun battleship' in that instead of picking a single point on a 3D grid, you'd pick multiple ones and fire on those points simultaneously. Of course that's provided your opponent's ship had sufficient power to stop and go on a relative dime. If they are going in a linear manner, then you'd just have to predict their intercept point and fire linearly.

Lastly, far as shielding goes it has been established that each section of a shield capable starship has one or more shield generators. Now, the Trek and SW version of shields asserts the projection is a 'plate-like' configuration. More than likely it would behave more like a magnetospheric shield and would be more bubble-like. So that implies that if you knock out one section, those still intact would continue to protect their area until significant power was lost.


I have to agree that with highly advanced computer systems which process information at transluminal speeds, it would be impossible to evade ship to ship weapons, unless the targeting was done manually. In fact, the computer should be able to execute firing sequences itself if it knows what it's targeting, and we've seen that SF computers can be utilized like that (from Voyager, the ECH commanded Voyager's computer to target the enemy vessel's engines).

Also, we do have examples of automated targeting being disabled where the tactical officers had to do manual targeting (which begs the question on why is the targeting system so easy to fail).

Plus, starships in Trek usually tend to go at about 0.25c of impulse speeds... faster velocities were noted without having relativistic effects though (which would likely make elaborate use of subspace fields). All ships tend to employ subspace fields for the purpose of lowering their mass... that's why large ships like the Sovereign and Galaxy classes are as nimble as fighters... plus I'm not sure we saw the full extent of their maneuvarebility.

Phasers and photon torpedoes can't really be too slow for the ranges they employ. The Nebula class had a maximum torpedo range of 300 000 km... phasers were limited to about half that range (or had a longer range). But that's for the Nebula class. The Galaxy class likely has a much larger range of it's main phasers... plus the Enterprise-D underwent upgrades to it's weapons to enhance the fire power and range.

If torpedoes can traverse 300 000km in 1 or 2 seconds... ships wouldn't have enough time to evade at 0.25C... they'd need to be roughly twice as fast (and its possible they are), and the evasive maneuvers would have to be executed by a computer. We saw on multiple occasions that in Trek, reaction times on behalf of the crew were critically low... whereas a computer was able to anticipate and react a lot faster.

SF never implemented it's automation to the maximum... or should I say, the writers never bothered to do it as they thought the organic beings wouldn't have anything else to do (which is not accurate).

But from what we know of Trek's capabilities, evading starsihps weapons is not useful in most situations, unless you manage to knock out the opponents automated targeting systems... and even then, you'd be hard pressed evading phasers that can travel at about 0.5 - 1c... or torpedoes that can do the same or better.


Wouldn't speed of light be an issue? Ships in space aren't exactly up close (but it would look boring on the big screen).

That means at extended distance even speed of light weapons would take several seconds to minutes to get to the target, and of course the target won't be where you saw it was since that ship 2 million km away is where that ship was about 5 seconds ago... Meaning evasive maneuver can fool prediction algorithms and not be where you think it ought to be...

By the way in one TNG Episode Captain Picard had the Picard maneuver which is designed to exploit the speed of light issue by making a very precise warp jump... making enemies think the ship is in 2 places at once.

  • This doesn’t really answer the question.
    – Obsidia
    May 13, 2021 at 14:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.