7

I finished reading Iain M. Banks' "Look to Windward" today, and I'm left puzzled by the side story involving Uagen Zlepe, a culture scientist.

In short, he discovers the Chelgrian plot from a dying Special Circumstances agent, but at the very end of the book it's revealed that he was killed by a Chelgrian before he could do anything with the information. He's then resurrected tens of thousands of years later.

Usually when Banks includes subplots like this, it either ties into the story as a whole near the end, or at least serves to illustrate the scale or severity of something else that's going on in the story. A decent amount of the book is devoted to Uagen Zlepe's studies of the Behemothaur Yoleus, and the conclusion to his story takes place after the main plot threads of the book are wrapped up, which I'd interpret as giving his fate a certain weight.

What was the purpose of this subplot? To be more specific, I'd be interested in:

  • Ways Uagen Zlepe's story added to or furthered the main plot that I might have missed.
  • Ways it may have served as a narrative device, such as introducing concepts or locations that were needed later.
  • Possibly interviews or comments by Banks himself regarding the subplot, if such a thing exists.
  • @Valorum That's actually not something I'd thought of, given that I was focused on his actual death happening at the end. It could very well be the reason! – BiscuitBaker Sep 6 '17 at 18:11
  • 1
    For the record, Zlepe's body is found several hundred million years later. – Valorum Sep 15 '17 at 9:33
7

Zlepe's story (and death) sets up the ultimate twist, that the one who informed the Culture of the plot to destroy the Hub wasn't Zlepe but was in fact...

...Huyler, inside Quilan's head.

"They showed me all there was to be shown about my society and theirs and, in the end, I preferred theirs. Essentially I became a Culture citizen and at the same time an agent of Special Circumstances, which is the uncharacteristically coy name they employ for their combined intelligence, espionage and counter-espionage organization."

We're told that the Hub knew of the plan before Quilan's arrival.

~ How long have you known? he [Quilan] asked.
~ I have known since a day before you arrived. I can’t speak for Special Circumstances.

But on the very next page we learn that Zlepe failed in his mission to inform them(!)

Failed. Failed to get back. Failed to warn. Failed to be the hero. It was not supposed to end this way, dying a lonely, painful death, conscious only of betrayal, fear and hopelessness.

So who told them? How the heck did they find out? We find that out in the epilogue;

I [Huyler] went along with everything else to keep Masaq’ and its people safe, not to ensure its destruction. I was SC’s insurance policy, their get-out clause, their parachute (I heard many colorful analogies). If I had been told to do so, I would have prevented Quilan from making his Displacements, not taken over and done them for him had he demurred. In the end it was decided that sufficient other safeguards had been put in place for the Displacements to go ahead, with the aim of back-tracking along the attempted wormhole link to discover and even attack the Involveds behind the attack (this failed and to the best of my knowledge it is still not known who those mysterious allies were, though I’m sure SC has its suspicions).

0

I agree with the above posts re: red herring that distracts suspicion from Huyler.

Also, it adds a dimension of wonder and whimsy because his inclusion facilitated the exploration of the megalithine life forms. This adds to the Culture universe and to the book I think.

Also, it allows the reader to get a glimpse into the far future of the Culture because the Future Yoleus mentions “he comes from the society that used to be called the Culture”, indicating the Culture is still around and has also evolved.

  • 1
    Hi, welcome to SF&F! You should take the tour! Posting that you agree isn't a good answer, but your other points suggest that you have the beginnings of a good answer exploring Zlepe's story as a narrative device to enrich and expand the story universe. Perhaps you could add a bit more to those, referencing specific parts of the book. Maybe show how Zlepe's point of view is used to describe explore the megalithine entities? – DavidW Apr 1 at 15:28
-3

The sub-plot of Uagen Zlepe, a scholar, is conducive to the dramatic tension of which is revealed the presence of an assassin, identity of which it is unable to be determined at this point in the novel. Of which tension is derivative of suspicions relating to probability of such an identity being equivalent to Tibilo Quilan, a Chelgrian emissary or other character of which revelation has not been made.

Further investigation into textual representation of Uagen Zlepe, a scholar, facilitates comparison and contrast between psycho-emotional response of Uagen Zlepe, a scholar, upon discovery of threat to Culture, a motherland, to relational states of other characters with concern to homelands of which it is respective to such individuals. Example being antipathy of Mahrai Ziller, a composer, to home society of which it is an origin. The conclusion of which it is that purpose of inclusion for Uagen Zlepe, a scholar, into story is to be ascertained of literary merit and significances of which the nature is thematic to the novel.

  • 2
    I'm pretty sure I already said that... – Valorum Jul 20 '18 at 14:42
  • @Valorum checks...yup. Pretty much. – JohnP Jul 20 '18 at 14:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.