13

Everyone can quote 'Burnside's Advice'...

"Friends Don't Let Friends Use Reactionless Drives In Their Universes"

... but tracking down the original and seeing it in context is proving impossible. Can anyone show where this famous quote originates?

  • Don't know, but it must post-date Larry Niven's Known Space books and stories (published over the late 1960s to 1990s), which is likely the source of the idea that such advice was needed. – Zeiss Ikon Sep 20 '17 at 16:00
  • Just did a good-effort Google; it appears Ken Burnside is a game designer, and is still alive -- may even have a Facebook page. Try messaging him? – Zeiss Ikon Sep 20 '17 at 16:10
  • 3
    You could twit at him; twitter.com/kenburnside1?lang=en – Valorum Sep 20 '17 at 16:21
  • 3
    @Valorum Thanks for that, if ever I take leave of my senses sufficient to twit at all I'll look him up. – Ash Sep 20 '17 at 17:28
  • 1
    The basic problem is that reactionless drives are so efficient that one can make a dirt-cheap planet-cracking missile by mounting one in the equivalent of a Naval row boat. – Winchell Chung Sep 20 '17 at 23:45
20

I'm the Ken Burnside in question.

It came up in response to a reoccuring discussion on SFCONSIM-L, a mailing list I moderate (and participated actively in at the time as I was developing Attack Vector: Tactical).

New List Member: "Hi, I'm writing about X, with spaceships that do multiple G thrusts, just like in the works of author Y!"

Ken (and other list members): "How do you keep someone from sterilizing planets as a result of putting that multiple G thrust on a cruise missile, launching it from the orbit of Saturn and letting it hit at fractions of c? The only way to really avoid this is using delta-v limited thrust and the rocket equation."

New List Member: "You big meany! I'm just trying to tell stories of rip-roaring adventure! If it's good enough for author Y, it's HARD SF!"

Ken: "Author Y made their reputation {30|40|50} years ago, and standards have changed. Besides, reaction drive calculations can be done fairly simply with a spreadsheet. You will end up with multi-month travel times, going onwards of two years, which may impact the story you want to tell."

New List Member: "AAARGH! You're ∗impossible!"∗

Ken: "Here's my advice: Friends don't let friends use reactionless drives in their universes."

This happened multiple times over four years, and Burnside's Advice became the shorthand form of the discussion. I'm still amused that this gets quoted more than 15 years later!

  • 2
    For what it is worth, I can vouch for the Ken Burnside who answered above. But do you trust me? I quote Ken in my website: projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/reactionlessdrive.php – Winchell Chung Sep 21 '17 at 3:34
  • 1
    Just replied on Twitter. – Ken Burnside Sep 21 '17 at 4:08
  • 1
    Ok, confirmation received. This is the real Ken Burnside people :). See also: i.stack.imgur.com/ifezW.jpg – Möoz Sep 21 '17 at 4:35
  • 2
    "I'm still amused that this gets quoted more than 15 years later!" Clarke's Law is three times that age, maybe more. Murphy (of Murphy's Law) was a real rocket scientist at White Sands in the 1940s, an acquaintance of G. Harry Stine. Burnside's advice will probably still be quoted when interplanetary travel, at least, is no longer SF. – Zeiss Ikon Sep 21 '17 at 15:52
  • 1
    @KenBurnside Do you know of a list with other technologies that break the way the world works in strange ways? I've read a couple of essays on travelling in time and space lately that seemly to alluded to a list of technologies that sound good until you look too close, your advice was quoted along with similar admonishments concerning time travel and inertial dampers. – Ash Sep 27 '17 at 21:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.