6

What would be the crew complement of an Excelsior Class star-ship closer to the time of the Dominion War? I know originally it had like 750, but older space-frames tend to have fewer crew as time goes on.

I'm running a Star Trek Adventures RPG and my players have chosen the Excelsior Class for their ship and I'm trying to make it accurate.

| improve this question | |
  • 2
    In lieu of a hard answer, I'd either: a) leave it the same - while some ops functions would be automated or deprecated, engineering crews would need to be a bit larger to keep the old girl running, or b) You seem sure that older frames end up with smaller crews - if you have evidence of this, maybe look up an example and apply that same ratio. For example, if the Miranda-Class went from a crew of 575 to 450 (78% of the original), then you could imagine a "modern" Excelsior-Class to have a compliment of just under 600. – Vanguard3000 Sep 20 '17 at 17:43
  • 1
    this may point you in the right direction - nothing specifically in the wiki re: crew complement but perhaps in the books? memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/USS_Lakota - memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/USS_Lakota_(NCC-42768) – NKCampbell Sep 20 '17 at 18:55
  • Also, as seen in many episodes, a starship can be flown by a much smaller crew in an emergency, possibly as low as one and frequently of not much more than a dozen. Depending on the mission, you might not need all of the cargo attendants, galley workers, and light bulb reinstallers. – Robert Columbia Sep 20 '17 at 23:47
5

According to the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manual, the Excelsior class has a standard crew complement of 750 units, between officers and regular crew.

Excelsior-class tech specs from DS9 Technical Manual

Since the manual was written entirely from an in-universe point of view during the DS9 years (~2375), we can assume that this information could be considered up-to-date for the timeframe of the Dominion War.

Anyway, it should be noted that the DS9:TM has received criticism for some inaccuracies, especially in the section that describes the various starships, exactly what we are discussing here; in example, the Excelsior class is said to have a complement of 750 units, exactly the same of the much bigger Nebula class (that is more or less the same size of the Galaxy class); it seems a bit strange that these two very different ships could have the same crew numbers.

| improve this answer | |
  • I'm torn between upvoting and not, because the tech manual is a non-canon source, as yourself point out. The truth is that there's no canonical answer, because there was never a story where it mattered enough to write a number into the script. – Michael Scott Shappe Oct 3 '17 at 23:22
  • 1
    Technical manuals and other reference books are not considered non-canon. They are not officially considered canon either, leaving them in a grey zone that can be considered at least as an "authoritative semi-official material"; I tend to accept this kind of information if it does not explicitly contrast what is seen on TV – Sekhemty Oct 3 '17 at 23:31
  • While I can't argue with the sentiment of the notes, there are potential logical reasons for it. The newer, larger ship may have a proportionally smaller crew because that's all it needs. Advances in computer support and automation frequently lead to reduced manning requirements in the real world - starships would be no different. – T.J.L. Oct 11 '17 at 14:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.