I sometimes see Wookieepedia articles citing Pablo Hidalgo's (a member of Lucasfilm Story Group) tweets. Are his tweets canon?

  • related, if not exactly a dupe: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/910/…
    – NKCampbell
    Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 15:06
  • Not a dupe. It says that Lucasfilm Story Group Reps decide what canon is. It doesn't say anything about them adding to canon. Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 15:11
  • I've seen it mentioned on this site that his twitter account specifically says his tweets shouldn't be taken as canon, but I wasn't actually able to find such a statement. Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 15:58
  • @DaaaahWhoosh it was likely on meta
    – Edlothiad
    Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 15:59
  • 1
    @DaaaahWhoosh - It used to say that (or words to that effect) on his twitter banner.
    – Valorum
    Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 16:08

2 Answers 2


Officially? No

It's worth reminding ourselves what "canon" means in the context of Star Wars:

enter image description here

@pablohidalgo Periodic reminder that all 'canon' means is: do other storytellers *need* to be beholden to it. That's it.

For the life of me, I cannot imagine Lucasfilm laying down an edict that requires future storytellers abide the exact words of Pablo Hidalgo's Twitter account. In other words, no matter how awesome she is, Millicent is not canon.

But it's still a useful resource

That being said, there's a reason Pablo Hidalgo is usually considered a "God" for the purposes of "Word-of-God". He holds a very privileged position with respect to the Star Wars canon, and has access to a vast quantity of material that the layfan will never see. So it's a little silly to disregard what he says out of hand.

Personally, I find it most useful - even if it's not technically correct - to consider (most of) Hidalgo's tweets as "canon until contradicted." The real value of his Twitter feed is that he can clarify the meanings of things that may not have been obvious; an advantage of his position. But at the same time, how do we know when something Pablo says is inviolate? Answer: we don't (usually; sometimes he's obviously joking1).

Hidalgo does try to make this easy for us: he almost never introduces wholly new ideas on Twitter, is frequently cagey when asked direct questions, isn't afraid to give generic responses like "that's not for me to say" or "not my call", and frequently reminds me people that major announcements aren't going to be made on Twitter of all places. Joking aside, I've never seen him deliberately mislead fans2; that's a large part of the reason why I, personally, feel comfortable citing him in answers here.

However, as non-insiders, we cannot rely on any of Hidalgo's statements not being contradicted by later works. Or by earlier works, for that matter. The ultimate source of "canon" is always going to be the published output.

1 Incidentally, this is why he really dislikes his tweets being cited on Wookieepedia

2 Whether or not somebody gets a joke is a different question, though Hidalgo usually tries to point out when someone has misinterpreted; if you have difficulty parsing his humour, it's worth reminding yourself of this fact when deciding whether or not something he said "counts" as canon.

  • 2
    It's also worth noting that not everybody considers "word of god" statements to be canon at all Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 16:00
  • Is there a page on Wookieepedia describing the process of how to use canon properly? And naturally, does it cite that tweet?
    – corsiKa
    Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 19:03
  • I upvoted your awesome answer, but i think Pablo himself saying his twitter is not canon is more canonical (is that meta-canon?) Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 23:01
  • @DVK-on-Ahch-To You mean like this or this? (Feel free to nick those, by the way). Nonsense. I refuse to believe Millicent and Ahsoka's pony farm aren't canon Commented Sep 22, 2017 at 23:06

I don't have a screenshot unfortunately, but as of December 2015, TFA release time, his Twitter account's blurb explicitly contained the text "Don't cite tweets as canon" (which I dutifully cited here in this answer). Here's more web evidence.


enter image description here

And just for an example:

enter image description here

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.