16

All through the Harry Potter series we see that spells require specific techniques that need to be practiced; Wingardium Leviosa has to be pronounced exactly right (Hermione: "It's 'levioSAH'") and accompanied with a specific movement of the wand ("swish and flick").

In The Half Blood Prince, Harry encounters the name of the spell "Sectumsempra" with the cryptic comment "for use on enemies" and no other clues as to how to cast it or what it might do. Then in the duel with Draco he uses it for the first time to devastating effect. How come?

  • 5
    Some spells are more complicated than others? – Jack B Nimble Oct 12 '17 at 16:44
  • 6
    We only see the students learn about pronunciation their first year, so maybe after a while you can intuitively understand how to pronounce/cast a spell (much like how they later learn unspoken spells). Plus, Harry's been experimenting with other spells from the Half Blood Prince the whole year, it's likely he's picked up on the HBP's unique style and can accurately guess how Sectumsempra is meant to be cast. – DaaaahWhoosh Oct 12 '17 at 17:12
  • 2
    related: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/171690/… – NKCampbell Oct 12 '17 at 17:22
  • Practice, experimentation, practice, etc. – Makyen Oct 12 '17 at 21:35
  • 8
    ahem It's leviOHHsah, not levioSAH – BlackThorn Oct 12 '17 at 22:58
23

Harry apparently knew the incantation, but possibly not accurate inflection. It's possible that while, yes, the spell was intended 'for enemies' - it was not necessarily meant to be wielded with the complete devastating effect that Harry casts it with.

In the first book, we learn that inflection / tone / letter is very important in Charms. Professor Flitwick says:

"And saying the magic words properly is very important too - never forget Wizard Baruffio, who said 's' instead of 'f' and found himself on the floor with a buffalo on his chest."

When we see Snape cast Sectumsempra (book 7), he appears to have very targeted, almost surgical precision with it, though he strikes the wrong opponent:

...the spell, intended for the Death Eater's wand hand, missed and hit George instead -

Clearly - Snape was not meaning to obliterate neither the Death Eater or George, but meaning to hit a small target instead.

Harry, however, when he casts it (book 6), casts it wildly and without any precision at all, literally shredding Malfoy apart:

"Blood spurted from Malfoy's face and chest as though he had been slashed with an invisible sword...Harry got to his feet and plunged towards Malfoy, whose face was now shining scarlet, his white hands scrabbling at his blood-soaked chest."

The inflection/intention of how the spell is cast, details that may not have been included in the margins of Harry's book, could account for the discrepancy in how they affect the target.

4

He read the incantation and pronounced it well enough that it worked.

Although Harry didn't know what Sectumsempra did, and didn't have explicit instructions how to cast it, he had seen it written out in the Half-Blood Prince's book.

There are at least two ways Harry could have managed to cast Sectumsempra without ever getting told how to pronounce it. Sectumsempra could have been easy enough to figure out how to pronounce by just seeing it written - certain words are easy to figure out how to pronounce without ever having heard them, and the same thing might apply to spells. In addition, he might not have pronounced or cast it perfectly, just well enough for it to have that effect on Draco.

If Harry was being graded on his casting of it, he may well not have gotten the top grade, he might have even failed. It had an effect, but likely not the exact effect that Sectumsempra has when cast perfectly.

Some spells don't seem to require special wand movements, so Sectumsempra might not.

Wingardium Leviosa requires a specific wand movement, but that doesn't seem to be the case for all spells, even more difficult ones. Some spells seem to be more 'point and cast', since specific wand movements aren't always shown being taught or used.

Lumos, for example doesn't seem to require a specific wand movement.

“Lumos,’ Harry muttered, and a light appeared at the end of his wand, almost dazzling him. He held it high over his head, and the pebble-dashed walls of number two suddenly sparkled; the garage door gleamed, and between them, Harry saw, quite distinctly, the hulking outline of something very big, with wide, gleaming eyes.”

Neither do Crucio and Imperio, since Harry casts both without ever finding out specific wand movements for either of them.

  • But then again you did teach Harry a bit: you really weren't thinking when you taunted Harry were you? To think that it's help him knock out a Carrow with your tip. Of course it's more like you just hold him in such contempt - and I can't say I blame you after all your time in Azkaban - that it's worth it; and I suppose that in your mind another victim of Crucio is only welcome. That being said I would say there is some inconsistency with spells requiring movements: that is it's sometimes needed and other times not and some were published after the books e.g. Morsmordre! – Pryftan Oct 12 '17 at 23:23
  • @Pryftan Yes, I do regret that. I should have simply called him a filthy half-blood instead. If he ever tried to use it again on me, though, I'd give him a proper demonstration of an effective Crucio! Yes, agreed, whether spells require specific wand movements is somewhat inconsistent, even considering that different spells might have different requirements. It is possible that some spells require specific wand movements and some don't, but the requirements for each spell should be consistent every time it's used. – Bellatrix Oct 13 '17 at 0:10
  • @Bellatrix well it's a bit late now, as a ghost there's not much you can do ;P – Frank Hopkins Oct 13 '17 at 0:19
  • 1
    @Pryftan took me a while to make any sense of that comment, especially since this answer never refers to Bellatrix as "I". – user253751 Oct 13 '17 at 5:39
  • @immibis Well, people might only see who wrote it when they got to the end, so it makes it easier to understand. Comments are shorter, so people will see who wrote faster. – Bellatrix Oct 13 '17 at 15:33
2

In terms of correct pronunciation:

1) Most spells based on non English words in the Harry Potter Universe are based on Latin, examples being accio, confundo, crucio, imeprio, diffindo, lumos, nox, Homenum Revelio, Priori Incantatem.

Harry knows English, and doesn't recognise the words Sectum and sempra. Therefore, he can make a pretty safe guess that they are probably Latin.

2) The words ARE from Latin. Roughly meaning "having been cut, always".

Therefore, Harry attempting to pronounce them as Latin words in on the right track. He also knows that it is for cutting your enemies. This may unconsciously bias the wand action used.

3) English is renowned for being inconsistent, making it hard to pronounce a written word. Latin is not.

Therefore, a competent Latin speaker could pronounce the word correctly, having seen it written.

4) Harry has been educated in the pronunciation of Latin words, and Latin based, in a way that makes it very easy to know when you are right or wrong.

Therefore, Harry can pronounce the words correctly.

  • 1
    Has Harry been educated in the pronunciation of Latin, or simply in words that are Latin based? That sentence implies the students are taking Latin courses – NKCampbell Oct 13 '17 at 1:03
  • 1
    @NKCampbell - edited slightly. Some words are taken from Latin exactly, some are adapted. – Scott Oct 13 '17 at 1:08
  • 1
    He also knows that it is for cutting How would he know that? doesn't recognise the words Sectum – Buh Buh GoFundMonica Oct 13 '17 at 9:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.