3

This question already has an answer here:

The ghosts of Hogwarts have been around the castle for a very long time, and possibly should remember the first time this happened, 50 years ago, when Tom Marvolo Riddle opened the Chamber and killed Myrtle. Harry could've gathered a lot of information about these events from these figures.

Why didn't Harry enquire about the Basilisk to any of the ghosts or the paintings?

Come to think of it, why didn't Dumbledore ask the ghosts about the Basilisk sightings? Also, even if he was in a position where he was able to do anything about it, why didn't he find the Chamber entrance himself?

enter image description here

And what about the paintings? The paintings of various teachers, headmasters and other figures flood the walls of Hogwarts. Is there a possibility that they could be petrified? Also, couldn't these paintings bear witness to the events? I know they sleep at night, but wouldn't they wake up to such events?

enter image description here



NOTE:
My knowledge on the series is highly limited, so please excuse any mistakes I may have made.

marked as duplicate by NKCampbell, Politank-Z, JohnP, Jason Baker, Blackwood Oct 19 '17 at 19:29

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • Not a dup since that question doesn't answer how the portraits didn't know. – amflare Oct 19 '17 at 18:59
2

Nobody knew about the Basilisk.

The only ghost or portrait who knew anything about the Basilisk and/or the opening of the Chamber was Myrtle. Harry didn't think to ask her until it occurred to him that her death was somehow connected to the Chamber, and this only happened towards the end of the year. Even when he did get around to asking Myrtle, her answer wasn't exactly all that descriptive.

"What do you want this time?"
"To ask you how you died," said Harry.
[...]
"No idea," said Myrtle in hushed tones. "I just remember seeing a pair of great big yellow eyes. My whole body sort of seized up, and then I was floating away..."
(Chamber of Secrets, Chapter 16, The Chamber of Secrets).

Myrtle didn't even know that it was a Basilisk which killed her, and she was the only ghost who had direct contact with it. She just thought that she'd died as a result of seeing yellow eyes. Harry already knew about the Basilisk at this point but if he hadn't have done then he (or Dumbledore) would've been none the wiser.

As for the other ghosts and the portraits, they didn't know any more than the students of the time. All they knew was the version of events as told by Riddle, which - after Hagrid's expulsion - became the official version of events.

In my fifth year, the Chamber was opened and the monster attacked several students, finally killing one. I caught the person who'd opened the Chamber and he was expelled. But the Headmaster, Professor Dippet, ashamed that such a thing had happened at Hogwarts, forbade me to tell the truth. A story was given out that the girl had died in a freak accident. They gave me a nice, shiny, engraved trophy for my trouble and warned me to keep my mouth shut.
(Chamber of Secrets, Chapter 13, The Very Secret Diary)
.

Since the truth was suppressed no-one had any means of knowing what actually happened.

The ghosts and portraits may have been around when the Chamber was first opened. But so was Dumbledore, and even he didn't know where the Chamber was or what the monster of legend was.

"The question is not who," said Dumbledore, his eyes on Colin. "The question is, how..."
(Chamber of Secrets, Chapter 10, The Rogue Bludger).

Can portraits be petrified?

No idea. It never happens so we have no means of telling. Ghosts can be petrified, though, so I suppose it's reasonable to suppose that other non-material personas can be too.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.