6

Spoilers for the ending of The Thing from 2011.

When Kate and Carter emerge from the spaceship, Carter is still wearing his flamethrower, like he was when he entered the ship.

However, he ditches the flamethrower and gets into the snowcat first. Of course, Kate then realizes he is a Thing who plans to drive the snowcat to the nearest base to get more biomass; she picks up the flamethrower and torches it.

Why did the Carther-Thing put itself in that position? It was alone with Kate, which was its modus operandi when infecting people before it was found out (like when the Juliette-Thing was alone with Kate earlier) and it had the flamethrower.

Why not infect or kill Kate at that point, instead of getting rid of its human weapon and getting into a vehicle with her? Even if it did manage to infect her en route without being found out first, assimiliation is a messy procedure, and it already crashed one helicopter while trying to overtake its passengers.

5

He wants to get close to Katie

When they first meet outside the spaceship, Katie is immediately wary of Carther. So it's reasonable to assume he took a risk in disarming, hoping she would trust him and climb into the snowcat with him where he could do his thing.

After all, he doesn't want to kill Katie, he wants to get close enough to infect her.


He's not very smart

It definitely would have made sense to just kill her and make his way to the next station alone. As the lone survivor, he could tell any story he wanted and there would be no talk of any infectious alien parasite!

But bad guys in movies rarely do the sensible thing.

  • I might have been unclear. I realize that Kate identified it as a Thing because of the missing earring (on the left ear, by the way), not because it dropped the flamethrower. I just don't understand why it dropped the flamethrower. – tobiasvl Dec 19 '17 at 12:11
  • @tobiasvl I updated my answer, hope that's a little better. – Daft Dec 19 '17 at 14:10
  • "he doesn't want to kill Katie, he wants to get close enough to infect her" Are those not one in the same? – Z. Cochrane Dec 19 '17 at 15:09
  • 2
    @zabeus How pedantic! :D He's armed with a flamethrower, if he plans on infecting her, I doubt he wants to set her on fire first. – Daft Dec 19 '17 at 15:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.