During the vote for the 998th Lord Commander of the Night's Watch we see a tie between Ser Alliser Thorne and Jon Snow. All of the brothers had voted blindly by placing a token in a jar. However, when the tie is revealed, Maester Aemon votes and breaks the tie in Jon's favor. Why did Maester Aemon not vote at the same time as the other brothers and instead get to vote after the other votes were already counted?

  • 5
    Excellent question. We need more of this!
    – Edlothiad
    Jan 12, 2018 at 16:37
  • 2
    So Maester Aemon either has a Casting Vote and no normal vote (like the US Vice President in the Senate), a casting votes and a normal vote (like the Australian Speaker of the House of Representative) or a normal vote unused by convention which is them employed as a casting vote (like the speaker of the UK house of commons). Maybe these institutions are what the author/writers had in mind. Jan 13, 2018 at 21:36

2 Answers 2


This appears to be a show only event and as such it is likely there just to build tension. As this is the case we most likely won't be able to find the reason as the show doesn't really explore the extended material and it doesn't appear to be addressed in the books. However, in the books Jon wins a landslide victory so there is no need for a deciding vote if that ever happened.

The rest was arrowheads, a torrent of arrowheads, a flood of arrowheads, arrowheads enough to drown the last few stones and shells, and all the copper pennies too.
When the count was done, Jon found himself surrounded. Some clapped him on the back, whilst others bent the knee to him as if he were a lord in truth. Satin, Owen the Oaf, Halder, Toad, Spare Boot, Giant, Mully, Ulmer of the Kingswood, Sweet Donnel Hill, and half a hundred more pressed around him. Dywen clacked his wooden teeth and said, "Gods be good, our Lord Commander's still in swaddling clothes." Iron Emmett said, "I hope this don't mean I can't beat the bloody piss out of you next time we train, my lord." Three-Finger Hobb wanted to know if he'd still be eating with the men, or if he'd want his meals sent up to his solar. Even Bowen Marsh came up to say he would be glad to continue as Lord Steward if that was Lord Snow's wish.
A Storm of Swords, Jon XII

Also in the books a man needs two thirds of the votes not just to win by one and until that happens the voting continuously takes place. This furthers the claim of this being a show only event so we're unlikely to find any new information.

Sam, you're a sweet fool, he could hear Jon saying, all the way back to the maester's keep. Open your eyes. It's been happening for days. Could he be right? A man needed the votes of two-thirds of the Sworn Brothers to become the Lord Commander of the Night's Watch, and after nine days and nine votes no one was even close to that.
A Storm of Swords, Samwell IV

  • 3
    That's interesting... so the entire scenario was constructed for the show only, and the books offer no indication to Maesters holding any type of special role (explains why I couldn't find anything). +1 for the book reference :)
    – Mwr247
    Jan 12, 2018 at 16:55
  • 1
    @Mwr247 Well I couldn't find anything in the books so I'd assume they just get to cast a normal vote like everyone else. But yes it was constructed for the show so likely just for the dramatic tension
    – TheLethalCarrot
    Jan 12, 2018 at 16:57
  • 8
    The adaptation is somewhat necessary for the dynamics at Castle Black to be analogous in both the series and the books: In the books, we read about Jon's perception of events while we actually see what's really going on in the series. The "truth" is that Castle Black was polarized quite... starkly (ba-dum-tss) into "pro-Jon" and "anti-Jon" factions, but Jon didn't notice it until it was too late. In the series, we can't read Jon's thoughts, so the gap between Jon's imagined popularity and the realities of Castle Black had to be illustrated in some other way. Jan 12, 2018 at 18:57
  • This doesn't seem to answer the question. The OP asked why something happened in the show, and you've said it doesn't happen in the books - surely that belongs in a comment at best?
    – Rand al'Thor
    Jan 12, 2018 at 22:47
  • 2
    @Randal'Thor my answer is probably to build tension the quote from the books is to prove it as it doesn’t happen that way in them.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    Jan 12, 2018 at 22:59

Out of universe: it provides some good dramatic tension, as well as an eloquent way of communicating just how close the vote was, and how divisive the outcome.

In universe: I can't find any sources as to whether or not Maesters hold a special role as tie breaker, but it's very possible that there's a real-world parallel to the office of Vice President of the United States, who also holds the title of President of the Senate. It is a position that does not have a vote except in the event of a tie.

Indeed, the episode seems to at least imply the tie breaker role. Note he appears to be the one presiding over the vote, and is never shown leaving his seat until informed of the count:

6:35 for the start of the vote casting, 7:12 for the resulting tie, 7:40 for Aemon's vote.

EDIT: TheLethalCarrot's answer shows that the entire scenario only exists within the show, and not in the book. With that, it's unlikely that we'll find a definitive answer beyond what we've seen.

  • 5
    It could also be that it is simply customary for the one presiding over the vote to abstain from voting, unless necessary to prevent a non-outcome. Jan 12, 2018 at 18:34
  • @JörgWMittag You are probably right that it's a function of that position, rather than being a Maester specifically, that grants that power. But if true, it still seems more than coincidence that Aegon, as Maester, is filling that role, and they are probably linked in some way.
    – Mwr247
    Jan 12, 2018 at 18:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.