I was reading Unfinished Tales, and I was reading the part about the Istari and came across this.

The essay on the Istari just cited thus tells much about them and their origin that does not appear in The Lord of the Rings (and also contains some incidental remarks of great interest about the Valar, their continuing concern for Middle-earth, and their recognition of an ancient error, which can not be discussed here)

To what exactly is this ancient error referring to?

Was it letting Sauron stay in Middle-earth after the War of Wrath?

Not defeating Melkor a lot sooner than they did, which allowed his evil to spread?

Or not helping heal Middle-earth after the War of Wrath?


D, none of the above

The ancient error is touched on slightly earlier in the chapter, clarifying that they mean appearing in forms of majesty amongst the Children of Iluvatar as opposed to using secrecy (the Istari)

And this the Valar did, desiring to amend the errors of old, especially that they had attempted to guard and seclude the Eldar by their own might and glory fully revealed; whereas now their emissaries were forbidden to reveal themselves in forms of majesty, or to seek to rule the wills of Men and Elves by open display of power, but coming in shapes weak and humble were bidden to advise and persuade Men and Elves to good, and to seek to unite in love and understanding all those whom Sauron, should he come again, would endeavour to dominate and corrupt.
Unfinished Tales - Part IV, II: The Istari

  • Gandalf appeared to play a little fast and loose with this restriction when he confronted Bilbo over the Ring. His statement "Then you shall see Gandalf the Grey uncloaked." is at least threatening not to keep his nature secret and he clearly stopped fully hiding his power. – Forrest Venable Jan 31 '18 at 7:43
  • 3
    @ForrestVenable, debatable. I don't see it as Gandalf revealing his majesty as opposed to his "mysteriousness", also the grave matter of the ring was slightly more serious, as that was the key to the Istari success. – Edlothiad Jan 31 '18 at 7:44
  • He gets described in similar terms as the Balrog, who has no reason to hide his power. scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/13403/… – Forrest Venable Jan 31 '18 at 7:48
  • 1
    @ForrestVenable I'm aware of Gandalf's descriptions, nor am I denying his ability to rise to a level of his former "power"/"majesty". I however fail to see the relevance of the comment. Gandalf was capable of expressing his power, he was however bidden to advise and persuade, and had indeed come in a weak and humble shape. His power (to some extent) still existed. I, however, believe that answer is hyperbolic with regard to the passages, Gandalf seeming to grow is not the same as him certainly growing, one must remember this is Frodo recounting the situations at a later time. – Edlothiad Jan 31 '18 at 7:57
  • I would still put the unchaining of Melkor high up on the list. – Spencer Apr 8 '18 at 22:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.