28

The books have established that the Invisibility cloak that Harry owned was the real deal (one of the Hallows) and not something you can buy in a shop. From this link we know that even though the Invisibility Cloak is immune to some forms of magic like Accio and probes which detect dark magic, it wasn't in general immune to curses and hexes. I want to know what would happen if someone, fully concealed by the Invisibility Cloak was to cast a Lumos spell? The light would obviously not be able to penetrate outside of the Cloak? So, would that work somehow like the "Hand of Glory" and show light to only the person concealed in the Cloak? Or would it not light anything at all?

  • 5
    Picturing what kids traditionally have used a flashlight under a blanket for...but this time the magazine is animated. – T.E.D. Feb 1 '18 at 14:43
  • Doesn't the linked answer kind of say the opposite in terms of Probity Probes (that they would detect the Cloak)? I'm kind of inclined to think that the probes wouldn't pick it up, though: they were using plenty of other concealment charms other than the Invisibility Cloak that the Probity Probes almost certainly pick up on - for example, I'd assume that they'd pick up on Polyjuice Potion. – EJS Feb 1 '18 at 20:37
  • Your head explodes and you die – Valorum Apr 4 '18 at 0:56
25

It most likely hides the light produced from an outside viewer.

There’s only one example of someone using Lumos (or any form of light) while holding the light source itself under the Cloak as well. Harry seemed to be using Lumos to read while hiding under the Invisibility Cloak when he stayed in the library overnight trying to figure out how to breathe underwater for the Second Task.

“… he would grab the Invisibility Cloak and go back to the library, he’d stay there all night if he had to …

Lumos,’ Harry whispered fifteen minutes later, as he opened the library door.

Wand tip alight, he crept along the bookshelves, pulling down more books – books of hexes and charms, books on merpeople and water monsters, books on famous witches and wizards, on magical inventions, on anything at all that might include one passing reference to underwater survival. He carried them over to a table, then set to work, searching them by the narrow beam of his wand, occasionally checking his watch …

One in the morning … two in the morning … the only way he could keep going was to tell himself, over and over again, Next book … in the next one … the next one …
- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chapter 26 (The Second Task)

From how Dobby finds him the next day, we can see he’d probably been reading while hidden under the Invisibility Cloak. We know he’d been using the light of Lumos to read by, so this proves at least that Harry didn’t think anyone would see the light from under the Invisibility Cloak.

“Harry opened his eyes. He was still in the library; the Invisibility Cloak had slipped off his head as he’d slept, and the side of his face was stuck to the pages of Where There’s a Wand, There’s a Way. He sat up, straightening his glasses, blinking in the bright daylight.”
- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chapter 26 (The Second Task)

Because of this, and also Harry not getting caught, it seems like the light shouldn’t be visible outside the Cloak. However, it’s also possible that it was visible, but Harry was unaware of that and lucky enough to get caught.

When Harry searched the library with the lamp, it wasn’t under the Cloak.

Harry did use a lamp to search the Restricted Section in his first year, but he never had the lamp under the Cloak with him. It’s possible that this is because the light doesn’t shine through the Invisibility Cloak to let him see outside of it. However, it’s equally as possible that Harry simply didn’t want to risk putting a hot lamp with an open flame under a fabric Invisibility Cloak in case it was flammable. (Although the Cloak is magic, and might not react like normal fabric, it seems like a sensible precaution to take anyhow.) He holds up the lamp to look at the titles, which would feel particularly precarious to do under fabric while holding a flame.

“The library was pitch black and very eerie. Harry lit a lamp to see his way along the rows of books. The lamp looked as if it was floating along in mid-air, and even though Harry could feel his arm supporting it, the sight gave him the creeps.

The Restricted Section was right at the back of the library. Stepping carefully over the rope which separated these books from the rest of the library, he held up his lamp to read the titles.”
- Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 12 (The Mirror of Erised)

At no point (in either the book or the movie) does Harry attempt holding the lamp under the Invisibility Cloak, which seems more like he’s concerned about setting it on fire than he knows it wouldn’t shine through - especially since he just got the Cloak recently and is still fairly new to the wizarding world in general.

  • 3
    Good find. I think this deserves to be the accepted answer. As a supplementary point, Harry's lit wand couldn't have been seen under the Cloak as the Cloak gives perfect invisibility, at least according to Xeno. – The Dark Lord Feb 1 '18 at 22:29
  • @TheDarkLord Thanks so much! I’m glad you like my answer! I’ll add in Xeno’s quote as well! – Bellatrix Feb 2 '18 at 2:37
  • The exert from the book is very helpful. Only thing is that the lamp does not have an open flame, it is semi-securely closed. – Jesse Feb 2 '18 at 3:05
  • 2
    I agree. The Goblet of Fire point was the perfect answer. I did not remember it. Never thought I would be thanking @Bellatrix though :D – dobby Feb 2 '18 at 6:44
  • 1
    Dobby vs Bellatrix: Round Two! – The Dark Lord Feb 2 '18 at 8:50
36

Based off this scene: enter image description here

We know that the light does not travel from inside the cloak -> out, as Harry must hold the lamp outside of his cloak in order to see the books. If he held the lamp inside his cloak the light would only spread inside the cloak, and perhaps under his feet if there were some gaps. Since there is no light going out, it is safe to say that nobody would be able to see it if you cast lumos from inside the invisibility cloak.

  • 3
    Is this scene described the same way in the book? The HP films aren't considered primary canon. – Rand al'Thor Feb 1 '18 at 13:48
  • 3
    @Randal'Thor Yes I believe so, however, whilst I agree this is a really clever catch, I think holding a burning lamp under a cloak is a bit different, practically, to holding a wand under there and at this point Harry didn't know Lumos – Au101 Feb 1 '18 at 14:18
  • 2
    Have you never used a lantern? It's a very dim, diffused light. It's more likely that just holding it closer to the books so he can actually read the titles/spines than anything else. I don't think this conclusion can be drawn from this particular scene in the film. – Roddy of the Frozen Peas Feb 1 '18 at 15:50
  • 3
    I wouldn't say this is evidence that light doesn't get out. In order to read those book titles, he would have to stretch his arm up like that regardless. Under the cloak, it would raise the cloak up revealing his lower body where it is simpler to just stretch the hand out of the cloak to hold the lamp up. I don't think this answer actually answers the question, it leaves it inconclusive still at best. – Tyler Dahle Feb 1 '18 at 16:23
  • 7
    Yeah that's probably artistic license. Without an external indicator, how could a viewer tell that there's an invisible person there??? – Roddy of the Frozen Peas Feb 1 '18 at 17:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.