I have been seeing in various comments references to replicators in Star Trek, occasionally arguing against various scenarios from the standpoint of energy usage - with arguments along the lines of "you might be able to replicate something that big, but the energy requirement would be astronomical."

We probably don't have any solid math explaining how this is done - however, are there any specific mentions that touch on the in-universe cost of this process?

  • 3
    As far as I remember, only references to rationing of replicator use due to energy shortages on Voyager. Or, the wisenheimer answer: 12. They use 12 energy.
    – Politank-Z
    Feb 4, 2018 at 17:26
  • 3
    The replicator doesn't turn energy into matter. It turns one form of matter (referred to as feedstock) into other forms of matter by re-arranging its molecules.
    – Valorum
    Feb 4, 2018 at 17:47
  • @Valorum Fair enough. Deleted that part, since it doesn't change the question.
    – Misha R
    Feb 4, 2018 at 18:39
  • @Politank-Z Well, the practical difference between canon technobabble and a wisenheimer is pretty subtle. But, for the time being, canon is what I'm looking for. If that doesn't work out, I might revisit 12.
    – Misha R
    Feb 4, 2018 at 19:05
  • 1
    The "feedstock" thing isn't really common knowledge, IMO. (I don't think it ever appeared on-screen.) So anyone arguing about energy usage might (or might not) be assuming that the replicator is subject to the good old E=mc^2. Feb 4, 2018 at 20:08

1 Answer 1


I'd be thrilled at a canon-based answer - but here's some reasoning out:

It would depend on the nature of the feedstock - the majority of food is Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen and Nitrogen - but we need a lot of other trace elements, too (iron, potassium, sodium, chlorine, calcium, and more). Plus, things like glasses and plates need to be made - so we need silicon, too.

We also don't simply take in atomaceous nutrients - we need it in the form of simple sugars and more complex carbon chains (carbohydrates and fats), and proteins.

There are three possible ways the replicators use the feedstock:

  • all sugars, starches, fats, etc, are precomposed and simply assembled into a steak and potatoes. This means only transportation energy is required. Two problems: much like an inkjet printer can run out of one particular colour, too much ice cream can deplete sugar and fat before starches; and, things like glasses and plates rely on more crystalline or complex structures.

  • the feedstock is elemental and carbon chains and crystalline structures are composed individually on demand. This adds the energy of creating bonds to the transportation. Could still run out of specific elements, though.

  • the replicators can manipulate protons and neutrons into the specific atoms it needs to then create the molecules we need. Huge amounts of energy! But highly flexible.

Luckily, ships and bases have ridiculous amounts of energy on tap from warp cores and fusion reactors.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.