5

When Harry receives the Invisibility Cloak for Christmas, it is described as fluid, shining and silvery gray (emphasis mine):

This only left one parcel. Harry picked it up and felt it. It was very light. He unwrapped it.
Something fluid and silvery gray went slithering to the floor where it lay in gleaming folds. Ron gasped.
"I've heard of those," he said in a hushed voice, dropping the box of Every Flavor Beans he'd gotten from Hermione. "If that's what I think it is — they're really rare, and really valuable."
"What is it?"
Harry picked the shining, silvery cloth off the floor. It was strange to the touch, like water woven into material.
"It's an invisibility cloak," said Ron, a look of awe on his face. "I'm sure it is — try it on."
-Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 12, The Mirror of Erised

This leads me to the question, why is an Invisibility Cloak seen? Shouldn't it be by definition invisible? Or does it work in the way that it's only invisible when someone wears it but not at other times?

  • Why should it be invisible when it isn't being worn? What would be the point? – Harry Johnston Mar 5 '18 at 3:34
  • 4
    @harry the invisible book of invisibility mentioned in book 3 was invisible. Probably pointless, but doesn't seem to prevent such things from happening in the wizard world – user13267 Mar 5 '18 at 4:21
  • 3
    But that's the Invisible Book of Invisibility, so by definition it's invisible. Presumably a regular Book of Invisibility would be visible. As this isn't the Invisible Invisibility Cloak the same rules can apply :) – delinear Mar 5 '18 at 12:43
5

It looks like silver fabric when not being worn, invisible when it is.

In occasions other than when it’s first introduced, when the appearance of the Invisibility Cloak is described, it’s described as silvery fabric.

“Harry had inherited just one thing from his father: a long and silvery Invisibility Cloak. It was their only chance of sneaking out of the school to visit Hagrid without anyone knowing about it.”
- Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Chapter 14 (Cornelius Fudge)

It’s repeated too many times to be a simple mistake, so we can presume it’s true. When no one is wearing it, it looks like silvery fabric - so it is visible when it’s not being worn.

“She hasn’t gone to get it?’ Ron said, staring after her.

She had. Hermione returned a quarter of an hour later with the silvery Cloak folded carefully under her robes.”
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 16 (Professor Trelawney’s Prediction)

However, it does become invisible as soon as someone puts it on. When Harry tries it out, it does make everything but his head invisible immediately.

“It’s an Invisibility Cloak,’ said Ron, a look of awe on his face. ‘I’m sure it is – try it on.’

Harry threw the Cloak around his shoulders and Ron gave a yell.

‘It is! Look down!’

Harry looked down at his feet, but they had gone. He dashed to the mirror. Sure enough, his reflection looked back at him, just his head suspended in mid-air, his body completely invisible. He pulled the Cloak over his head and his reflection vanished completely.”
- Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 12 (The Mirror of Erised)

Therefore, it seems like it is visible when not being worn. This is logical - there’s no reason for it to be invisible when it’s not being worn. In fact, if it was invisible all the time, it would be a lot harder for its owner to find it if they’re not sure where they left it.

  • 1
    This ought to be a separate question on its own, but what the hell.. Can the cloak hide inanimate objects? – sudhanva Mar 5 '18 at 4:40
  • 2
    @sudhanva, you are right, this should be another question, please ask it by clicking the Ask Question button. – amflare Mar 5 '18 at 4:51
  • 3
    Can the robe detect intent? What if someone simply threw it over their shoulder to carry it around? Would it turn invisible then? – DCOPTimDowd Mar 5 '18 at 19:53
  • @DCOPTimDowd It is capable of giving partial invisibility, such as when Harry's head is visible but his body isn't, outside the Shrieking Shack. – The Dark Lord Mar 6 '18 at 11:21
  • 2
    @TheDarkLord Yes, but he was actively wearing it then. Do we have anything that says the robe knows when it's being worn, and not simply being hung on something or someone? – DCOPTimDowd Mar 6 '18 at 17:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.