9

Could Dumbledore and the rest of the Hogwarts Professors pick up another Wizard's wand and identify its owner without having seen the wand before?

4 Answers 4

9

Ollivander was able to identify the owner of a given wand by touching it, but of course he had seen the wand before and presumably the person it was purchased for ("The wand chooses the wizard" -- I don't think the wand chooses the wizard by long distance). Perhaps Gregorovitch was able to do this as well. As it is, I personally cannot think of a canon example where someone identified the owner of a wand solely through touch, without knowing the owner previously.

1
  • 4
    Didn't Ollivander simply never forget a wand? "“I remember every wand I’ve ever sold, Mr. Potter. Every single wand." Harry Potter and the Philospher's Stone - Diagon Alley. So he identifies the owner by touching the wand, because he remembers selling it!
    – Möoz
    Apr 16, 2014 at 2:11
3

In the Shrieking Shack in Prisoner of Azkaban Lupin identified Harry's, Ron's, and Hermione's wands:

He separated Harry's Ron's and Hermione's wands and threw each back to its owner; Harry caught his, stunned.

Identifying Harry's might have been simple because when he originally disarmed them, Harry's was separate. However, Ron's and Hermione's were both disarmed from Hermione:

"Expelliarmus!" Lupin shouted.

Harry's wand flew once more out of his hand; so did the two Hermione was holding. Lupin caught them all deftly, then moved into the room, staring at Black, who still had Crookshanks lying protectively across his chest.

This could thus be an example of a wizard being able to identify a wand's owner.

It is, of course. possible that Lupin simply carefully observed his students and memorized their wands, but there doesn't seem to be any reason why a teacher would do that, especially when they have several hundred students.)

1

There's no canon evidence I know of for the teachers to do so, but the Ministry can identify a spell caster in some cases - such as casting Prior Spell on the wand (assuming they know what spells the wizard did last).

Also, Arthur Weasley in his job went after wizards who bewitched Muggle things - meaning they likely had SOME way of identifying just who bewitched the things.

3
  • I could be mistaken, but I thought I remembered something in one of the later books about a wand being 'registered'; I'd take it to mean that it's unique signature or characteristics had somehow been logged... But I might be crossing HP and some other stories.
    – K-H-W
    Jun 17, 2012 at 0:20
  • In 'Fantastic Beasts' movie, any foreigner witch or wizard visiting U.S. is subject to 'wand permit' registration, which, like weapon registration IRW, allows MACUSA to identify a wand owner.
    – TimSparrow
    May 17, 2017 at 17:05
  • @TimSparrow - and, just as in IRW, that didn't seem to work where it actually mattered (catching Gellert G) :) May 17, 2017 at 17:44
0

Probably no. The evidence is in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix chapter 7. When Harry enters the building of the Ministry of Magic, a security wizard records identifying information of his wand. Chapter 34 then confirms that this is standard procedure for all visitors of the Ministry. If it were easy to identify the wizard from a wand without recording this information, the Ministry would probably not bother with that step.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.