7

In the intro text of TNG it isn't

where no MAN has gone before

anymore, but

where no ONE has gone before

Has there ever been an official explanation why the text was changed? My initial suspicion is that it's either the result of trying to avoid allegations of sexism or because the creators of the show themselves perceived the phrase as sexist.

  • Extended discussion in comments has been moved to chat. Please use comments only for constructive criticism of the question, not for debating any political agender. – Rand al'Thor Apr 21 '18 at 22:22
  • I've protected this question as it seems to have attracted multiple low-value answers. – Valorum Apr 23 '18 at 18:58
5

TLDR

  • AFAIK, no one knows absolutely for sure, but...
  • We can be safe to assume it was to be politically correct.
  • Without trying to turn this into a debate about "PC Police"...

According to Wikipedia:

  • The original phrase was introduced in August of 1966.
  • Political correctness was in full swing by the 1980s.
  • The modified version was used in 1987.
  • By the mid 90s and early turn of the century political correctness research was in full swing.
  • The original phrase was reinstated in 2009 with the reboot films.

So while I can find no real confirmation (from official sources) we can be safe to assume the change was made with the idea of being politically correct. There are a lot of Google results that debate this topic and Google will even auto-complete the search when you type it in. Just about everyone is in agreement of why the change was made, but as I said, I can find no official statement to the fact.

Also, given the amount of time that has passed since the changes were made it is unlikely we ever will hear an official statement. Conjecture and inference are our only allies here.

So it is very likely that attempting to be politically correct the powers that be modified the introduction in an attempt to not seem gender biased. Of course, changing 'man' to 'one' makes the show inclusive of the idea that women are fully capable of exploring other worlds too.

By the middle of the 1990s the battle over political correctness was very much in full swing and the idea had been warped and weaponized. The bulk of the research appears to have begun to emerge around the early and mid 2000s with the ideas of being 'PC' both good and bad. Still today there is new research being done about the topic and attempting to determine if its effects are more of an improvement or determent to our society as a whole.

With the release of the new reboot films in 2009 and 2013 the introductory phrase was returned to its original. I can not find any official reasoning for this or who made the decision. Since the original change and more recent reversion the two camps have persisted. One side holding to the idea that the original phrase is sexist and the other to the idea that 'man' has always meant 'mankind.'

Quite honestly, it means what we as society deem it means. Words and meaning change throughout history and always will. For me, I have always read the phrase as 'humanity' and the idea that the human race is exploring among the stars... obviously there are already other man and woman genders out there in the Star Trek universe... they are just of different races...

  • 2
    The opening narration for Star Trek: The Next Generation was "where no one has gone before" from the beginning, in 1987; I don't think it was ever changed. – Nathan K. Apr 21 '18 at 23:21
  • 2
    @NathanK. I think you’re correct. I suspect the date of 1991 is the first time it was used in the movies (The Undiscovered Country). – Darren Apr 21 '18 at 23:50
  • @NathanK. - You are both correct. Thank you for noticing that error. I will make that necessary change. – Odin1806 Apr 23 '18 at 18:35
  • 7
    The difference between "no man" and "no-one" is actually a major plot point in "The Undiscovered Country", where the federation is accused of being a "homo sapiens only" club before Kirk mends interspecies relations with the Klingons and very deliberately corrects himself in the closing dialog. So in that context at last this was not specifically about male and female, and more about an generalised "us and them". – Eike Pierstorff Apr 23 '18 at 19:13
  • @EikePierstorff - That makes me curious if there is anything in the Special Features of that film... – Odin1806 Apr 23 '18 at 23:10

protected by Valorum Apr 23 '18 at 18:58

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.