Given how long it takes to master elements, Team Avatar should have realized they probably couldn't make much of a difference in Book 3 just by training bending abilities during the short amount of time they had left. Why didn't they try anything to reconnect Aang with the Avatar State? As it was proven repeatedly, it's the best advantage they had against the Fire Nation.

Aang was basically fixed by getting hit in the back with a pointed rock. They could have tried to find the guru again, and maybe he would have given a massage or something that would have brought back the Avatar State. In the discussions preceding Sozin's Comet, the characters hardly mention this superpower, the only real chance Aang had against the Fire Lord.

Why didn't Aang and friends make any effort to bring back the Avatar State? The way the writers did it really seems like a deus ex machina. It meant that Aang's victory hinged on the small chance that he gets slammed into a rock in the right way. Not only was the guru alive, but Aang also had the wisdom of all past lives, some of whom might have had the knowledge to help.

  • 1
    I'd like to point out that victory didn't actually depend solely on Aang getting access to the Avatar State again. Aang had a chance to end the battle early on when he redirected Ozai's lightning and was perfectly positioned to send it right back to Ozai. Instead, he chose not to and redirected it in a harmless direction.
    – Ellesedil
    May 21, 2018 at 21:42
  • 2
    I'm not sure if Aang really could have finished Ozai with the lightning, but it seems like the writers were definitely implying it by showing that second of fear on Ozai's face. Man that scene really bugged me. Aang is so lucky he didn't pay badly for that stupid decision.
    – tphilli
    May 22, 2018 at 1:53
  • 1
    In aang's many visions past avatars used it sparsely and usually for barely more than a couple of seconds. This is because, when an avatar dies in the avatar state, the cycle is broken. After being almost killed in the avatar state, he relied more on his own abilities rather than the avatar state because of that experience. And many criticisms of deus ex machina is unfair to me. Even in real life, you need a bit of luck & the unexpected to win wars, big games like the world cup and many more. Also real life have plot holes. Jun 2, 2018 at 9:50

2 Answers 2


The guru seemed pretty definitive when he said Aang turning away from the Avatar State when he did would render him locked out forever. And no doubt Aang remembered the whole rigamarole from the beginning of season 2 when he tried (and failed) to deliberately enter the Avatar State. So he no doubt thought trying would be a waste of his time.

Remember too that their plan, both before and after the Day of Black Sun, was for a decapitation strike against a few specific high-ranking individuals; Aang probably thought he could handle them with his ordinary bending - particularly since he has the advantage of using (at that point) three different disciplines against his opponents' one. As it turns out, he was catastrophically wrong in that assumption, but he didn't know that at the time.

  • 1
    Well, they did try a lot in Book 2. I guess the explanation is that they underestimated Ozai.
    – tphilli
    May 21, 2018 at 19:46

The show stated multiple times that if the avatar dies while using the avatar state, the avatar cycle ends. That means no more avatar forever1.

The last time he had used the avatar state before book 3 was in a fight against Azula and a number of fire nation soldiers. That did not end well. If he tried to pull the same stunt in the heart of the enemy's forces, he would surely die and there would never be any hope of a new avatar arising to bring balance to the world anymore.

Aang using the avatar state against the Phoenix King might have been more of a calculated risk from his past lives. He was facing just one enemy there, not a whole army.

1 Taking what we learn in The Legend of Korra into account, the cycle might be restarted, but it would take decades in the very least, or multiple cycles of light an darkness (at 10,000 years each) in a worst case scenario.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.