In the movie, Hagrid feeds a strange, moaning creature in his hut while discussing with the trio about Buckbeak's tragic fate. When Fudge, Macnair and Dumbledore come to kill the Hippogriff, he hides this plant-beast thing hastily under a blanket:

Clip of the scene here and picture below:

Mysterious creature

This thing is probably illegal (Hagrid hides it from the Minister) or at least shouldn't be at Hogwarts (he hides it from Dumbledore).

I can't see which creature this abomination is. We know that Hagrid bred the Blast-Ended Skrewts, but it doesn't fit the description (and they first appear in The Goblet of Fire, normally) nor the illustrations on Pottermore:

Pottermore illustration of Blast-Ended Skrewts

My second guess is a Venomous Tentacula, but this is not really illegal and we can see some in the sixth movie, and it's completely different:

Venomous tentacula

JK Rowling was really cautious during the movie productions, it would be a surprise if she let the director create new creatures for a gag...

So, what is that thing? (based on its appearance, books, interviews, ...)

  • 1
    Maybe the plant itself (if it's only a plant) isn't illegal, but is the sole food for an illegal/dangerous/wild/everything-that-Hagrid-loves animal. That would imply that Hagrid keeps an illegal beast, wouldn't be the first time he did (hence the quick hiding).
    – Jenayah
    Jul 5, 2018 at 15:42
  • 3
    They invented characters with speaking parts for this movie (Bem), I don't think she'd have minded an unnamed, generic, magical monster thing necessarily. And after all, she was getting to be more hands off at this point. Many abominations ... uh ... visual changes were made beginning with this movie, such as moving away from uniforms and cloaks and making it look like it was set in the real world, but everyone rather tragically carries around some over-designed pointers
    – Au101
    Jul 5, 2018 at 16:28
  • 1
    Excepts of an interview with Alfonso Cuarón :Q: Was there anything that you really wanted to put in that she vetoed? A: Yeah—little people. Just as extras. It was a scene in the Great Hall; I wanted to have an organ played by little people jumping on the keyboard. I [storyboarded it], and she said, “No, those little people, they don’t exist in this universe. So no.” The thing is, she is so eloquent about her universe that you really feel stupid. (full interview here : snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/… ) Jul 5, 2018 at 16:41
  • 3
    Wikia cites it as Unidentified Creature. Also, considering the amount of rubbish that made it into that film, breaking continuity not only with the books but with the other films) I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was a movie addition. Jul 5, 2018 at 18:23
  • 2
    I've emailed Nick Dudman, who worked on creatures on the Harry Potter movies. No response yet. Jul 25, 2018 at 10:34

1 Answer 1


This is 'Egg Creature'.

Apologies if that seems like an anti-climax but, based on a discussion with the filmmakers, I think that's the best answer we're going to get.

Firstly, if it seems that this isn't a creature that was mentioned in the books, that's because it isn't. That was my first impression as a Harry Potter gold badge holder and I was unable to find any evidence of such a creature in the books. The creature also isn't mentioned in the film's screenplay.


Where then to start with a definition for a creature which isn't mentioned (as far as I can tell) in any of the books and which is only on-screen for a few seconds? After all, there's no info about it on Pottermore, anywhere online or in any of the behind-the-scenes DVD material (I did check all of the above).

I started by going to IMDb and looking up the people who worked on the film, focusing on those in the Make-up Department and the Special Effects Department. As you can see, there are quite a few people credited as working on the film. A total of 22 people had a credit for working on creatures in some way. It wasn't at all clear who might be able to shed some light on our creature.

I set about the task of Googling the most likely contenders. Some I could track down, some I couldn't. After several leads falling dead I came across the website of BGFX, the production company of Barrie Gower, who is credited on the film under 'creature effects'. Barrie didn't have a strong recollection of this creature but helpfully pointed me in the direction of Gary Pollard, who isn't credited by IMDb on this film for some reason but clearly did work on some of the other Harry Potter films.


Here's a summary of our correspondence. Me to Gary:

I've searched the script and books and can't find a reference to this creature. I'm hoping you could help me identify what it is. I'm part of a group of fans who are wondering what kind of creature it is, looking for a name more than anything else.

Do you have any recollection of this creature at all? Did it or its species have a name on the set?

Gary's response:

Yes I remember the creature - I designed and sculpted it. I did a small scale maquette and then went on to sculpt it full size. I seem to remember an animatronic designer called Tamzine Hanks built the mechs and i think she was even inside the egg operating it! I had completely forgotten about it so this is funny. I think, disappointingly, it was just called 'Egg Creature'!

Me to Gary:

It's such a thrill to find the person who designed this creature! It's a shame it didn't have a name as such but perhaps not surprising if it was only on screen for a moment. Still, that's a great titbit which is very helpful.

I'm guessing that if it was nameless then it was an original concept that wasn't based on anything from the books? Do you have any recollection at all about the brief you were given when designing the creature? Whether it was trying to create a strange, contraband creature that Hagrid would be likely to have in his hut, or something more specific? I'm sorry, I know it's been a long time since you worked on this film. Anything else you can recall would be much appreciated.

Gary's response:

I'm pretty sure it was not from the books and purely as a strange creature for Hagrid to throw a titbit to. I know it was difficult to see (let alone catch) the morsel being offered. The brief was pretty much 'something in a large egg' and not much more.

From Gary's comments I'd conclude that it clearly wasn't a creature that was being adapted from the books. It was a creation of the filmmakers and Gary was simply tasked to make "something in a large egg" to add to the mystique of Hagrid's hut. The reason there isn't more backstory on this creature is because that backstory doesn't exist.

JK Rowling was really cautious during the movie productions, it would be a surprise if she let the director create new creatures for a gag...

This isn't really true. Rowling was generally consulted on the films but generally didn't really put her foot down in stopping a great deal. The thinking behind the inclusion of the Egg Creature doesn't seem to be much more different than the decision to include bats in Hagrid's cabin. These creatures were added in at the instruction of the director, Alfonso Cuarón.

In Harry Potter 3 we used the bats quite a bit, mainly in Hagrid's hut. They did a lot of flying around. The director, Alfonso, loved them, so he wanted them more and more, all the time.
(Jim Warren, Animal Trainer).

In reality, the filmmakers exercised a lot of creative control, which also explains the inclusion of things like the Frog Choir, which also don't appear in the books. This Egg Creature therefore was a product of the filmmaking process, not an adaptation of anything Rowling ever described.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.