In Goblet of Fire we find butterbeer available to students in Hogwarts several times:

At the party after Harry's name is picked out of the goblet:

Harry couldn’t get away; whenever he tried to sidle over to the staircase up to the dormitories, the crowd around him closed ranks, forcing another butterbeer on him, stuffing crisps and peanuts into his hands....

At the party after the First Task:

Sure enough, when they entered the Gryffindor common room it exploded with cheers and yells again. There were mountains of cakes and flagons of pumpkin juice and butterbeer on every surface;

At the Yule Ball:

“How’s it going?” Harry asked Ron, sitting down and opening a bottle of butterbeer.


Krum had just arrived at their table clutching two butterbeers.

Throughout the remainder of the series we find butterbeer at many parties in Gryffindor Tower. Even if Hogwarts doesn't officially serve it (except perhaps at special occasions like the Yule Ball), it is obviously not very hard to come by (probably just go to the kitchens and ask for some). It is referred to as "black-market butterbeers" by the planning of the end of exams party in Order of the Phoenix but that doesn't seem to have made it difficult to procure.

This being the case, why in Prisoner of Azkaban was Lupin so sure that Harry would have never tried butterbeer before just because he couldn't go to Hogsmeade?

“I have complete confidence in you,” said Lupin, smiling. “Here — you’ve earned a drink — something from the Three Broomsticks. You won’t have tried it before — ”

He pulled two bottles out of his briefcase.

“Butterbeer!” said Harry, without thinking. “Yeah, I like that stuff!”

Lupin raised an eyebrow.

“Oh — Ron and Hermione brought me some back from Hogsmeade,” Harry lied quickly.

Wouldn't it be very plausible and believable that Harry had once had butterbeer in Hogwarts? Indeed, Lupin of all people would know how easy it is to raid the kitchens, having been best friends with James Potter who routinely did so, as mentioned in Philosopher's Stone:

“Ah — your father happened to leave it in my possession, and I thought you might like it.” Dumbledore’s eyes twinkled. “Useful things ... your father used it mainly for sneaking off to the kitchens to steal food when he was here.”

Lest anyone suggest that butterbeer in Hogwarts only started in Goblet of Fire, we already find it at a party in Prisoner of Azkaban after the Quidditch match against Ravenclaw:

Fred and George Weasley disappeared for a couple of hours and returned with armfuls of bottles of butterbeer, pumpkin fizz, and several bags full of Honeydukes sweets.

I am assuming that the butterbeer at parties comes from within Hogwarts, not from Hogsmeade. I am assuming this because it seems entirely implausible that Fred and George are going illegally to the Three Broomsticks when anyone there can see that they are students, and especially in Prisoner of Azkaban when Hogsmeade is under dementor patrol after sundown. Moreover it would be nearly impossible to carry enough back for the entire Gryffindor house, even if they didn't have to go through a "very narrow, low, earthy passageway" that takes ages to get through and then climb up a stone slide. Not to mention that Fred and George would have no reason to pay for the entire house's food and drinks, even if they could afford it (which they certainly can't). As Fred explicitly states in Order of the Phoenix regarding the 25 butterbeers at the first DA meeting:

“Cheers,” said Fred, handing them out. “Cough up, everyone, I haven’t got enough gold for all of these...”

Additionally, it is clear from several passages in Goblet of Fire that the parties are sourced from the kitchens:

“Well, we’d better get downstairs for your surprise party, Harry — Fred and George should have nicked enough food from the kitchens by now.”


Hermione took a jam tart. Then she said, “Did you get all this from the kitchens, Fred?”

“Yep,” said Fred, grinning at her. He put on a high- pitched squeak and imitated a house-elf. “ ‘Anything we can get you, sir, anything at all!’ They’re dead helpful ... get me a roast ox if I said I was peckish.”


“You know what?” said Ron, once he, Hermione, and Harry had left the kitchens behind and were climbing the steps into the entrance hall again. “All these years I’ve been really impressed with Fred and George, nicking food from the kitchens — well, it’s not exactly difficult, is it? They can’t wait to give it away!”

  • 8
    @C.Koca Butterbeer is about as strong as cider, it seems. There are dozens of descriptions of children drinking it (and being given it by adults, like Lupin offering it to Harry here) with no effects whatsoever. This is in start contrast to Firewhiskey, which Hermione is outraged that Ron is considering trying in their fifth year, because he’s a prefect and thus shouldn’t be setting a bad example by drinking that sort of stuff. So yes, the wizarding community isn’t very tolerant of underage drinking, but Butterbeer clearly doesn’t count as drinking. Aug 5, 2018 at 16:32
  • 3
    your willfulness to ignore what the book is telling you as fact, Fred and George leave hogwarts and go to Hogsmead- FACT. denying a fact as presented in the text, your question has now become unclear what your asking...\
    – Himarm
    Aug 5, 2018 at 21:08
  • 2
    Further evidence that you can get Butterbeer inside the castle: Winky's drunkenness. Would she (or Dobby) have gone to get Butterbeer all the way from Hogsmeade? Even if the Three Broomsticks serves house elves, I doubt it. And @Himarm, no, presenting evidence for one possibility as opposed to another, even if it's mistaken, doesn't make a question "unclear what you're asking". Don't use close votes as super-downvotes.
    – Rand al'Thor
    Aug 5, 2018 at 21:18
  • 1
    @C.Koca We have a separate question about that: scifi.stackexchange.com/q/17699/4918 "Does Butterbeer Contain Alcohol?"
    – b_jonas
    Aug 5, 2018 at 22:43
  • 1
    @Himarm Fred and George leave hogwarts and go to Hogsmead- FACT. The issue is not whether Fred and George can leave Hogwarts and go to Hogsmeade. The issue is whether they do go to Hogsmeade and bring back butterbeer for their entire house.
    – Alex
    Aug 5, 2018 at 23:10

3 Answers 3


I think we can take it that Lupin just casually assumed that since butterbeer isn't served at Hogwarts and is generally obtained from Hogsmeade and since Harry wasn't allowed to go there (which was kind of a big deal), he wouldn't have tried it before.

When Harry blurts out that he's tried it, Lupin raises an eyebrow. Having aided and abetted Harry's father, Lupin gets a little suspicious, a little interested, but he seems broadly satisfied with Harry's explanation.

'I have complete confidence in you,' said Lupin, smiling. 'Here - you've earned a drink. Something from the Three Broomsticks, you won't have tried it before -'

He pulled two bottles out of his briefcase.

'Butterbeer!' said Harry, without thinking. 'Yeah, I like that stuff!'

Lupin raised an eyebrow.

'Oh - Ron and Hermione brought me some back from Hogsmeade,' Harry lied quickly.

'I see,' said Lupin, though he still looked slightly suspicious.

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - p.182 - Bloomsbury - Chapter 12, The Patronus

I understand that his suspicions weren't completely squashed, but students probably aren't really supposed/expected to be throwing all night parties with alcohol brought in from outside and I'm not really surprised that Lupin wouldn't exactly have expected students to be giving their own butterbeer to first- or second-years, even if one of them is the boy who lived. So while I agree you've spotted what is probably the result of butterbeer being introduced later in the series and then used more and more, as Himarm says, it's not really such a gaping hole in the story. Lupin quite understandably assumes that Harry wouldn't have had a chance to try something that you generally get in Hogsmeade. In fact he probably got it into his mind that he was giving Harry a special treat, so he's very much going into this conversation with that idea in his head. He is then thrown. His casual assumption has been proven false. He is suspicious when he finds out Harry has tried it, knowing what his father used to get up to and knowing about the existence of the Marauder's Map. He is then pacified by the plausible explanation that somebody else gave it to Harry and doesn't seem to find that so weird. I would agree you would have a point if Lupin had responded along the lines of "What? Students can't bring butterbeer into Hogwarts! You've been sneaking into Hogsmeade, haven't you? Turn out your pockets!" But you ask

Wouldn't it be very plausible and believable that Harry had once had butterbeer in Hogwarts?

And the answer is yes it would be very plausible and believable and Lupin does buy it, essentially. I know he "still looked slightly suspicious", but I think that would likely have more to do with Harry and his body language and what Lupin might have picked up in his voice than any large author oversight.

  • 2
    Alternative explanation for Lupin's "slightly suspicious": This is James Potter's son. Of course Lupin of all people would still be suspicious. But sneaking out to Hogsmeade (or stealing from the kitchens, or whatever Lupin assumed Harry might have done instead) isn't exactly the crime of the century, so he lets it pass without comment. What is he going to do instead, go find McGonagall and report him?
    – Kevin
    Aug 6, 2018 at 5:21

Butterbeer was introduced in year 3 .

Harry wasn't allowed to go to Hogsmeade in his 3rd year due to the threat of Sirius Black. Sirius Black being the primary threat/villain of the 3rd book, that drove the plot.

‘Well, third-years at Hogwarts are allowed to visit Hogsmeade, but my aunt and uncle didn’t sign the permission form. D’you think you could?

Fudge was looking uncomfortable. ‘Ah,’ he said. ‘No. No, I’m very sorry, Harry, but as I’m not your parent or guardian –’

Butterbeer was a plot item introduced in year 3 to coincide with visits to Hogsmeade. With Harry not allowed to go, it was an item Ron and Hermione could brag to Harry about having and him not knowing what it was due to his lack of being at Hogsmeade.

With the introduction of the Marauders map the acquisition of butterbeer became a non-issue, and so from that point on in the series, butterbeer became readily available to the Gryffindors.

So while Fred and George could have gotten butterbeer before Harry's 3rd year, the fact that it wasn't invented out of universe till the 3rd year, for a plot prop, is why it was probably that Harry would have never had butterbeer before.

  • 5
    This doesn’t really answer the question. The fact Butterbeer happens not to be mentioned in the first two books is not an explanation to why it’s not mentioned in the first two books. From the third book onwards, Butterbeer makes several appearances at Hogwarts, and there’s no reason to assume, in-universe, that this was any different in Harry’s first two years, even if it’s not mentioned. Fred and George had the Map before Harry, and they would be more likely than him, after all, to use it to procure Butterbeer. Aug 5, 2018 at 10:56
  • 5
    @Edlothiad There’s nothing wrong with the premise of the question. But questions on here are in general taken to be in-universe unless otherwise specified. Giving an out-of-universe answer only is only warranted if the question calls for it, which this one doesn’t: it’s clearly asking about in-universe logic. The answer may be that it’s an oversight by JKR, but simply stating that Butterbeer wasn’t introduced to the reader before PoA doesn’t even say that—it’s basically just repeating part of the question. Aug 5, 2018 at 15:32
  • 4
    @Alex - Is that from Hogwarts? The impression I always got from that passage is that Fred and George had traveled to Hogsmeade to buy them.
    – ibid
    Aug 5, 2018 at 20:15
  • 2
    @Alex the butterbeer js coming into hogwarts from hogsmede, fred and george have to leave the school to get it. So its not very easy to come by
    – Himarm
    Aug 5, 2018 at 20:16
  • 2
    @Alex - Honeydukes sell fudge containing Butterbeer. It's plausible that their cellar contains a considerable amount of the stuff
    – Valorum
    Aug 5, 2018 at 21:44

We know the Dursleys didn't give him butterbeer so he couldn't have had it until his first year. I would think that butterbeer was like soda in the Muggle world: not exactly healthy and not welcome at the dinner table. So Harry would not have had it during meals. No big events (that included food) happened until his fourth year. By then he had tasted it in Hogsmeade. And the first times he had it inside Hogwarts was:

a. with Lupin
b. during the "we won the Quidditch Cup" party

These weren't everyday things. It was not readily available to 1st and 2nd years.

  • 2
    Just because it isn't supposed to be available, doesn't mean it isn't - think of some real-life dormitories who get their hands on alcohol anyways
    – Jenayah
    Aug 15, 2018 at 21:56
  • 1
    Other than the fact that it apparently didn't exist in the first two books, is there any reason why it wouldn't have been as available then as in the later books?
    – Alex
    Aug 15, 2018 at 21:57
  • Jenayah, I know it could have been, but Harry's dormitory followed the rules regarding butterbeer.
    – user103390
    Aug 25, 2018 at 23:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.