2

In the Bartimaeus series, it seems that the quality of magic has declined. For instance, Khaba, in ancient Israel, could control a marid and several other spirits, the former of which alone modern-day Bartimaeus estimated would take two magicians. The Amulet of Samarkand has protective powers greater than anything modern magicians can muster up. Perhaps most astonishingly, the Ring of Solomon enslaved an entity of almost incalculable power, and it was ancient before Solomon's time. There are other, more minor examples of this trend.

All this despite the fact that magical investigation seems to have proceeded apace, with magical innovations such as spirit-based camera and such proceeding at a decent clip, and that the world population is a lot larger.

Even the staff of Gladstone, which is relatively new, is at least a century old, and it's the weakest of these major artifacts.

Why is this?

  • 1
    Because older is better – Valorum Aug 19 '18 at 10:37
  • @Valorum - That's not an explanation, that's a restatement of the question. – Adamant Aug 19 '18 at 23:36
  • Lol. And hence why I didn't post it as an answer. But that's why. – Valorum Aug 20 '18 at 6:06
  • I'm not familiar with the series but it seems to follow a common trend of magic being less powerful in "modern times". On possible explanation is that wizards tend to guard their secrets which causes knowledge to be lost. – Verdan Aug 21 '18 at 17:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.