In Episodes IV, V and VI, we never seem to see rear turrets on the Rebel X-Wings and Y-Wings. However, in Episodes I, II and III we see quite a number of manual turrets with Clone Troopers in them.

Why is this?

  • 7
    The first movie has Luke starting out alone, then finding friends but at the end, he is alone again and realizes that he has to carry the weight on his back with the help of some force and a dead guy. He needs to grow and do the impossible. If there was another person with a turret or some automatic lasershow, the scene wouldn't have worked. Episodes 1-3 didn't work. Also, the 70ies and budget. Don't make unprepared audiences dizzy
    – Raditz_35
    Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 8:34
  • 4
    I answered the question why don't combat aircraft have rear-firing weapons over at aviation.SE a couple of years back and have nothing to add to that answer. ;-)
    – DevSolar
    Commented Sep 5, 2018 at 7:36
  • 3
    @SaltySub2 The episodes IV-VI Y-Wings did very much have a turret on top of the canopy that could turn a full 360 degrees and was controlled by a seperate gunner (unless they were an BTL-A4 model). More on this in my answer. Commented Sep 5, 2018 at 9:14
  • 3
    obligatory link
    – Damon
    Commented Sep 5, 2018 at 12:07

6 Answers 6


I am not familiar with any model X-Wing having rear turrets, let alone manned ones, nor appearing in Episodes I-III.

As for the Y-Wings, I assume you are referring to the BTL-B "Republic" Y-Wing, as seen here (can be missing the panelling, which has other lore reasons I won't go into here): BTL-B "Republic" Y-Wing with panelling

We can see that, like you stated, there's a bubble with space for a living gunner, instead of it being controlled by for instance an astromech, targeting computer or the pilot themselves. The benefit of a wide bubble like this was that the gunner could easily see around him, while the seat and turret could turn a full 360 degrees around.

However, there were many downsides too, as one could imagine. Firstly, such a bubble exposes the gunner greatly to enemy fire. And as Legends has stated, at first, a shot to the canopy would mean the whole cockpit got sucked out. This later got fixed by separating the space of the turret and the pilot space (see Incredible Cross-Sections of Star Wars: the Ultimate Guide to Star Wars Vehicles and Spacecraft). But yet, the issue of the gunner easily getting shot out remained. This meant the gunner had to be moved somewhere more safe and concealed. This led to the development of the BTL-S3 and later series of Y-Wings, the ones you refer to when speaking about Episodes IV-VI.

Throughout the whole of Star Wars, guns like these are usually controlled by someone other than the pilot simply for the reason it'd make things too complicated for the pilot, who's already under a lot of strain during combat. So, there's an external party needed to help. The Republic solved this by means of another clone in the bubble. This also has to do with the fact that at this point, it is implied astro mechs are not advanced enough to do both hyperspace planning and co-piloting as well as controlling such systems.

Y-Wing during trench run

Here we see a Y-Wing (either BTL-S3 or BTL-A4) during the trench run. You can see the gunner bubble is gone, yet I can assure you that there's still very much a gunner present (in most cases). But instead of being in an obvious, easy to shoot bubble, they are in the back of the canopy, under the turret. In Star Wars, humans are simply more trusted with targeting and shooting targets than computers (besides tracking assistance systems).

"The BTL-S3 was a variant of the Y-wing starfighter line. It was typically crewed by a pilot and gunner, who sat back-to-back in the cockpit." - Wookieepedia, excerpt from BTL-S3 Y-Wing

However, at this point of the Star Wars timeline, these targeting computers and astromechs have gotten much more advanced. So we start to see the gunner being removed, and instead the astromech controls the turret, or there's a targeting computer placed under the turret (although this was rare because of the aforementioned reasons).

Additionally, there was also the BTL-A4 Y-Wing which completely removed the gunner seat and instead locked the overhead cannons into an forward aiming position (sometimes in different archs, or other angles), so that the pilot could just pull the trigger at what he was flying at.

"The Koensayr BTL-A4 Y-wing starfighter was crewed by a single pilot. The 16-meter-long attack starfighter had an ArMek SW-4 ion cannon turret which was preset to one of four arcs and was typically locked forward, although some pilots chose to lock it facing aft for extra cover." - Wookieepedia, excerpt from BLT-A4 Y-Wing

BTL-A4 Y-Wing cross-section BTL-A4 Y-Wing as found in *Oncredible Cross-Sections of Star Wars: the Ultimate Guide to Star Wars Vehicles and Spacecraft* shows the removed gunner seat, instead filled with electronics (probably retrofitted to improve other systems or allow for a bigger targeting computer, although there are no details on this). The texts on the page also back up the information I've been talking about about the BTL-S3 and BTL-A4 models.

Here is my speculation on why Star Wars relies heavily on traditional army place configurations (a.k.a. any gun not pointing forward is controlled by an added gunner(s)): Star wars was first conceived during the late 1900's. It was also heavily inspired by World War II (see 'Historical')** when it comes to the warfare. At this time, the idea of such advanced computers in such a small package, or that are able to distinguish and attack 'enemies' was simply not thought of. Although, droids do exist, so do many other computers doing all sorts of stuff like this. So the only other reason I can think of is because Lucas simply wanted to keep to tradition of planes with multiple crew, possibly to keep it somewhat recognisable for the viewers.

"The space battles in A New Hope were based on filmed World War I and World War II dogfights." - Wikipedia, excerpt from Star Wars sources, Historical**

** From Empire of Dreams: the Story of the Star Wars Trilogy (2004, IMDb). In this documentary, George Lucas speaks about the inspirations behind Star Wars' technology, clothing, but also the way fights are orchistrated and what vehicles are based on, amongst much more.

  • 1
    canon sources for the info listed here would be good
    – NKCampbell
    Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 13:24
  • 2
    @NKCampbell Thanks for the reminder, I have added many sources of information, as well as some quotes! Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 14:33
  • 1
    Generally speaking, we prefer sources not to be wiki since they are of dubious provenance but this is a good start. One trick is to check the source the wiki uses and reference that
    – NKCampbell
    Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 14:43
  • 1
    Thank you for the tips! I was already going through sources from the start, but books in my collection are a bit harder to quote (and I wanted the answer out for this person). I'll see to add deeper sources later today. Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 14:58
  • I cannot quote these books directly because I do not own them anymore, but for more detail on this ship, check "the Essential Guide to Warfare" as well as more of the cross-section books I already mentioned. Additionally, to see the BTL-B in action, check the Star Wars the Clone Wars animated series. If I come across any sources where one can see a BTL-S3 in action with the gunner clearly visible, I will link this, too. Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 18:09

Think of the Star Wars fighters as WWII aircraft, mostly carrier aircraft.

  • The most effective day fighters were single-seat models, like the Hellcat or the Corsair. Mostly armed with forward-firing cannon, but also rockets or bombs. Think X-Wing, or take the Zero for TIE -- agile but fragile.
  • To go after enemy ships (not enemy fighters) there were two-seaters or three-seaters, like the Avenger or the Kate. They had a rear gun, but it didn't help much. Those are the Y-Wing.
  • Naval fighters with turrets like the Roc didn't work out.
  • The ARC-170 feels more like the Black Widow. The Black Widow was an excellent night fighter, not a day fighter.

So a single-seater without tail guns fits the trope. Tail guns for day fighters didn't work in WWII, so they don't happen much in Star Wars.

  • 1
    Heres a question from a different Stack that addresses why it didnt work for ww2 fighters. aviation.stackexchange.com/q/14971
    – Jason_c_o
    Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 21:32
  • 1
    The trench scene in Star Wars Episode 4 was, in fact, strongly influenced by the attack on the Norwegian Fjord in the World War II movie "633 Squadron." See also youtube.com/watch?v=lNdb03Hw18M Commented Sep 5, 2018 at 3:49
  • 1
    @RobertHarvey Worth noting that the clip you link to is from the Dam Busters. I recall reading that Lucas planned the Death Star battle sequence by splicing lots of bits of old war movies together. Commented Sep 5, 2018 at 20:30
  • 1
    See also this side-by-side of 633 Squadron and the Battle of Yavin: youtube.com/watch?v=y6HKO8JINj8 Commented Sep 5, 2018 at 20:38
  • Helpful comparison to WWII.
    – SaltySub2
    Commented Sep 11, 2018 at 12:22

Some Y-Wings, at least, do have a turret above the cockpit, as in this specimen from Rogue One:

Y-Wing from Rogue One, showing its topside turret

All the references I've found to Y-Wing turrets, in both canon and legends, indicate that the turrets are controlled by either a gunner in a second seat, or the pilot. (The pilot obviously has a lot to deal with already, so it tends to be locked off forward or back in this configuration.)

I'm not familiar with an X-Wing variant that has a turret, in either canon or legends.

As for why the Y-Wing has a turret gunner and not an autoturret, well, the state of Star Wars technology seems to indicate that living gunners are just better. That's why the fighters have living pilots, and the capital ships have actual gunnery crews.

  • what references? Listing the reference and associated information would be valuable
    – NKCampbell
    Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 13:27

Another thing to consider is Manpower. The clone army has troops to spare so creating a ship that needs 6-7 soldirs to fly it and man all the guns is not a problem, if that ship is shot down there are plenty of replacements to call up for the lost soldirs. By the time of the rebellion manpower is stretched thinly it is therefore better to have a crew of 2 split between 2 seperate fighters then to put those 2 in one ship. At least then if a ship is lost you only lose 1 pilot and by fighting as wings the risk of not having a rear gunner is somewhat negated by the fact your wingman can take out the ship behind you.

The rebellion was also limited by which ships it could lay its hands on. The X Wing was designed to be easy and quick to build and so the rebellion took what they could get there hands on.

  • Fair enough, however that's why the "automatic" turret question which wouldn't require a person. Some have pointed out the in-universe situation appears to be the lack of computing ability (ostensibly especially if you are the Rebellion) to perform astromech duties as well as effectively operate the turret. Cheers.
    – SaltySub2
    Commented Sep 11, 2018 at 12:20

There are no turrets or rear gunner in the X-Wings because they are fighters, and fighters dogfight with other fighters by maneuvering rapidly.

The Y-Wing is an attack bomber and tends to deliver its payload of ordnance in relative stable flight in a straight in approach, hence a rear gunner is useful to defend against rear attacks while the ship is making an attack run.


We are never told if the Y-Wings of Gold Squadron had rotating turrets or if they had been fixed forward. Interestingly, the Action Fleet Y-Wing, released by Galoob in Gold Leader livery, featured a rotating turret.

  • Hi, welcome to SF&F. The Lego Y-Wing (7150, for example) also had a rotating turret, but unless we can confirm those models are canon it doesn't really help answer the question.
    – DavidW
    Commented Nov 9, 2020 at 4:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.