In TNG 'Where No One Has Gone Before', the Enterprise is sent hurtling through space past countless galaxies, when the Traveller “upgrades” the ships propulsion. Though the ship is thousands of light years travel away (at warp 9.9), they mention any communication would take 51 years to reach Starfleet.

That means they have communication faster than their maximum warp speed.

How much faster is this communication? I thought warp 9.9 was the Star Trek speed limit?

  • 2
    Are you sure you have the right episode? I don't remember them travelling to another galaxy in that episode. Also, though trivial, since their ships can travel FTL isn't there therefore FTL communication even if you had to take a ship and communicate in person? – NominSim Jun 29 '12 at 20:28
  • 2
    I have a hard time not seeing this as too localized. They are communicating instantly with people in other star systems all the time. – user1027 Jun 29 '12 at 20:55
  • 1
    This question seems very basic / easy. – Jack B Nimble Jun 29 '12 at 21:03
  • 2
    I just recently rewatched the VOY episodes The 37's: When Janeway asks Ensign Kim why the signal was not detected, Kim explains that Starfleet vessels only monitor their standard frequencies. AM signals are not within this spectrum because they only travel at the speed of light, too slow for interstellar communications. – Oliver_C Jun 30 '12 at 8:12
  • 1
up vote 18 down vote accepted

Subspace communication occurs at Warp 9.9997, according to the TNG Technical Manual.

Faster-than-light subspace communication is explained in detail in the official Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, by Michael Okuda and Rick Sternbach, who were the principal production designers for TNG.

From Section 8.5 on the "Subspace Communications Network" (click to enlarge):

enter image description here

enter image description here

In particular, under ideal circumstances, subspace communications travel at Warp 9.9997, which is

"...about sixty times faster than the fastest starship..."

according to the Manual.

So in other words: yes, communication is faster than the Enterprise's maximum speed.

With that part out of the way...

How accurate is the estimate of 51 years?

According to the Manual, Warp 9.9 (Enterprise D's top speed) is 3053 times the speed of light. If subspace communications achieve roughly 60 times this speed, that means that these transmissions travel at approximately 183,180 times the speed of light. Hence, a subspace communication will cover a distance of roughly 183,000 light years in a year.

On the other hand, in the episode we hear:

PICARD: Data, what distance have we travelled?

DATA: 2,700,000 light years.

But 2,700,000 divided by 183,000 is only about 14.75. In other words, it should only take about 15 years for the communication to reach Starfleet, rather than 51!

Of course, the Manual says that Warp 9.9997 is achieved under "ideal galactic conditions". In could be that Data factored in some non-ideal conditions, such as the lack of subspace relay points outside of the galaxy and the Galactic Barrier.

Yes, Star Trek does have FTL communication. That's why they are able to contact Starfleet instantly and do real-time conversation. Otherwise, real-time communication wouldn't be possible even from near Jupiter.

From Memory Alpha:

Subspace communication (also called subspace radio or the hyperchannel) was the primary form of communication used throughout the Federation. By transmission through subspace rather than normal space, subspace communication permitted the sending of data and messages across interstellar distances faster than the speed of light.

Also, worth mentioning: Subspace radio signals propagate at about Warp 9.9999, about 100 times faster than Warp 9.6 (according to Star Trek: The Next Generation; Writer's Technical Manual). It means that subspace communications aren't just faster than speed of light, but much faster than even high-speed Warp vessels.

  • 2
    In Star Trek: Enterprise subspace (while FTL) may have been a lot slower. They mentioned that it could take some time for civilian subspace telegrams to be delivered, as when Travis' father died. – Hack-R Feb 25 '16 at 2:22
  • @Hack-R: "TRAVIS: My mother sent a message to Starfleet six weeks ago, but I never got it. ARCHER: The civilian channels can be pretty slow. TRAVIS: I should have called him." I read this as being an administrative problem, not physical. – Lightness Races in Orbit Aug 8 '16 at 13:30

Yes, in the Star Trek universe, there is faster than light communication, most often by means of subspace.

It is never stated exactly what "subspace" is. It is often referenced and described, but never defined. It is some sort of realm that exists alongside normal space, but can be exploited in various ways for communication and travel. In various Star Trek series, there are mentions not only of subspace communication but subspace relays. Subspace messages will slow down as they travel through subspace, eventually slowing the signal. These relays "recharge" a signal so that it can continue moving through subspace at a high rate of speed. This subspace communication is sometimes used for real-time communication, and sometimes it is sent in discrete messages.

When within a friendly or controlled area of space, these relays likely formed something akin to our internet. They could serve as smart control devices, routing messages to and through other relays to create a complete, uninterrupted signal from source to destination at speeds much greater than normal light speed communication. When outside of established space, subspace messages seem to still be viable, but take a prolonged period of time to reach their target, or the nearest relay that can pass the signal along at an increased speed.

  • 1
    Curious as to why this was voted down? Seems like a substantive answer to me... – NominSim Jun 29 '12 at 20:41
  • 1
    @NominSim Even though it's stated on the Memory Alpha article, it's stated without reference: I can't recall anything/anyone that said that a subspace communication will drop into normal space. The impression given is that it simply degrades, kind of like radio waves. – Izkata Jun 29 '12 at 23:44
  • @Izkata That's a reasonable point, and I'm new here, but wouldn't a slight edit (as I've done above) serve to fix the problem better than removing it? Also, radio signals will eventually degrade/disperse to a point of uselessness. Even at long ranges, as mentioned in the question, they seem sure that the message WILL reach its destination, just far in the future. Does that not better fit the explanation than degrading like a radio signal? – Zoneman Jun 30 '12 at 2:23
  • 2
    @Zoneman Edits are better, yes. I didn't do the downvote, though - I was speculating based on what I would think is the most likely reason to downvote. – Izkata Jun 30 '12 at 2:33
  • @Izkata Understood - thanks! – Zoneman Jun 30 '12 at 2:34


This question has two parts which I address distinctly:

  1. How does the FTL communication in Star Trek work? - through what's called 'subspace', which is a form of space that exists alongside our space but doesn't seem to have the light-speed barrier, meaning messages can travel at far faster speeds than the speed of light
  2. How much faster is this than conventional warp? - it depends. If you have subspace boosters, we see speeds of Warp 9.9999 = 199,516 times the speed of light; obviously significantly faster than the speeds any 24th Century Starfleet vessel could attain. Without these boosters though, we see a speed somewhere between Warp 3 and Warp 4 on the TNG scale, so not really all that fast relatively. The other related point raised in the question is about the Warp limit being 9.9 - we see here that subspace messages can exceed this, however they still can't break the Warp 10 barrier (which is explained as infinite velocity). Hence, we still know that some speed barriers must apply.

I see this question as having two distinct parts which I will accordingly address distinctly:

1: How does FTL Communication in Star Trek Work?

As outlined in the other answers and on Memory Alpha, the communication used in Star Trek is called Subspace Communication. By sending messages over subspace, it means that faster-than-light communication can be used, as the light-speed barrier does not apply in subspace. The precise definition of subspace is somewhat elusive, however we know that:

Subspace is an integral part of the space-time continuum, distinct, yet coexistent with normal space. Subspace and normal space are confluenced together. However, in some regions an interfold layer forms between the two realms. (VOY: "Real Life") Subspace has an infinite number of domains. Geordi La Forge compared it with "...a huge honeycomb with an infinite number of cells". (TNG: "Schisms")


This seems to be classic Star Trek technobabble to me; the fact is that we don't actually know all that much about Subspace, other than that it can be accessed to send messages through and that the light-speed barrier does not apply in it.

Now, for the more important part:

2: How much faster is it than warp?

As mentioned in the question, in TNG 'Where No One Has Gone Before', when the Enterprise-D is sent hurtling a vast distance into another galaxy, Data tells us how long it would take for a subspace message to travel. Maths time!:

  • The Enterprise was ~2.7 million light years from their previous position

Now, I think it's reasonable to assume that the Enterprise-D's previous position was within real-time communication distance of Starfleet, so the distance between their previous position and Starfleet would be relatively negligible

  • Data says it would take:

    fifty-one years, ten months nine weeks, sixteen days

    for a subspace message to reach Starfleet (Source)

From this information, we can calculate the approximate speed of a subspace communication. Bear in mind that there would be other factors involved which could distort this slightly; for the majority of the journey, the subspace message would continue travel through subspace on its merry way, not boosted by subspace relays.

As we know, speed = distance/time, so here comes the maths:

Fifty-one years = 446760 Hrs ten months = 7300 Hrs nine weeks = 1512 Hrs sixteen days = 384 Hrs

Which, in total, is 455,956 Hours i.e. Subspace travels at a speed of approximately 2.7 million light years in 455,956 hours.

If we convert 2.7 million light years to km, we get 2.55 * 10^19 km, so that's a speed of 2.55 * 10^19 km/455,956 Hrs. Converting this into the form of X Km/Hr, we get a speed of 55,926,449,043,328.7 km/hr i.e. Data's estimation puts the speed of a subspace message at about 56 billion km/hr. For comparision, the speed of light is about 1,079,252,848.8 km/hr, so we're looking at about 56 times the speed of light

Now, how does this compare to the TNG Warp Scale? Ex Astris Scientia has a handy table for this. The result is fairly disappointing though: 56 times the speed of light would put it somewhere between Warp 3 and 4 on the TNG Warp Scale. It would actually be faster for them to personally deliver the message by travelling at Warp 4 or above!

This is, however, assuming there aren't any subspace relays. That Ex Astris table I linked to earlier also shows that the subspace relays have a huge impact upon the speed of subspace messages: it says that a subspace radio message with booster relays travels at warp 9.9999 = 199,516 times the speed of light - this would be much faster.

Now, this doesn't mean there is necessarily inconsistencies here; as pointed out in Hack-R's comment on @SS's answer, we see in Enterprise that, without subspace booster relays, it subspace messages can still be relatively slow compared to those which have the luxury of a booster relay.

Memory Alpha makes another interesting observation: that subspace messages slow down if they don't receive a boost

In 2374, however, Voyager was able to communicate almost instantaneously between the Delta and Alpha Quadrants using a system of ancient relay stations, proving that subspace communication signals slow down over time unless amplified by a relay station.

  • 1
    We can also assume that being relatively 2.5mill light years away, that there would be no federation subspace relays boosting the signal, hence why it could take some 50 years to reach the nearest Starbase – user69917 Aug 8 '16 at 2:45

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.