6

While the Empire had committed a number of serious atrocities since 19 BBY, Alderaan’s destruction was a major game changer. Why wasn’t that event referenced in Episodes V to VIII?

  • 3
    Just at a wild guess -- because most of the sympathetic characters in the subsequent movies were people who were already part of the Rebellion, and knew what had happened to Alderaan, and saw no reason to lecture each other every day on what every member of the Rebellion already knew? (And the bad guys, of course, didn't care what happened to Alderaan anyway?) – Lorendiac Dec 16 '18 at 23:41
  • 2
    Are you looking for an in-universe reason why none of the characters mentioned it, or an out-of-universe reason why the producers didn't write the characters referencing it? – ApproachingDarknessFish Dec 17 '18 at 3:02
  • 1
    It's not in the movie, but the destruction of Alderaan is referenced several times in the novelisation of The Last Jedi. – Nathan Griffiths Dec 17 '18 at 4:40
  • 1
    There were some extended universe materials that showed that the destruction of Alderaan was actually a major theme in the pro-Rebel Alliance propaganda and publicity, in the years immediately following. – Buzz Dec 17 '18 at 4:41
7

In short, because there was no particular in-universe reason to reference it.

I'm going to take the two pairs of movies separately. In The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi, the story follows the main characters, who hardly need reminding, and the hardcore supporters of the Rebellion - people who have already decided to commit their lives to the cause. There's no need to give them a rabble-rousing speech about how terrible the Empire is, because the rabble is already roused.

In The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi, on the other hand, take place quite a bit later, when the memory of Alderaan isn't as fresh and the link to the antagonists isn't as clear. Palpatine and Vader are both dead (to say nothing of Tarkin, who actually ordered the attack), and the First Order - though in many ways aspiring to be the Empire - is not the Empire. There's no reason to go dragging up thirty-year-old atrocities committed by a vaguely related government... certainly not when the First Order is perfectly willing to commit its own atrocities.

Perhaps more to the point, the focus of the movies was never on the politics or morale-building of a resistance movement. Instead, the focus was on the heroic escapades of the protagonists, who knew very well why they were fighting. Adding scenes about motivating the troops would simply have taken screentime away from the real purpose of the movies.

-1

One reason for this is that the event ended so many lives that nobody mentioned it out of respect for those who died. In the Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi, all of the rebels and the members of the Empire knew of its destruction and it was not mentioned as it was common knowledge. In the sequel trilogy, it was not mentioned due to the large time gap and other atrocities that occurred on a larger scale, such as the destruction of the Hosnian system.

  • 2
    Can you back up these bold statements with some evidence? – Valorum Dec 21 '18 at 0:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.