6

Can someone visually explain the world from the 'Tower of Babylon' story?

Where does the sun go at night if the world is a cylinder? Is the sun outside/inside of the cylinder or on the same level as the “Earth”?

6

The world described in Chiang's Tower of Babylon isn't a tube or a cylinder, it's a series of concentric spheres.

The smallest sphere is the Earth itself, with all of its people and mountains and plains and seas. Above that is the air (clouds, etc) and above that is the Moon, the Sun and then the stars. At the very highest point, farthest from the ground is the "Vault of Heaven", a granite sphere that encompasses everything that we've already mentioned.

The Moon

With the passage of the weeks, the sun and moon peaked lower and lower in their daily journeys. The moon flooded the south side of the tower with its silver radiance, glowing like the eye of Yahweh peering at them. Before long, they were at precisely the same level as the moon when it passed; they had reached the height of the first of the celestial bodies. They squinted at the moon's pitted face, marveled at its stately motion that scorned any support.

The Sun

When they were at the level of the sun, they traveled entirely at night. During the day, they tried to sleep, naked and sweating in the hot breeze. The miners worried that if they did manage to sleep, they would be baked to death before they awoke. But the pullers had made the journey many times, and never lost a man, and eventually they passed above the sun's level, where things were as they had been below.

Now the light of day shone upward, which seemed unnatural to the utmost. The balconies had planks removed from them so that the sunlight could shine through, with soil on the walkways that remained; the plants grew sideways and downward, bending over to catch the sun's rays.

The stars

Then they drew near the level of the stars, small fiery spheres spread on all sides. Hillalum had expected them to be spread more thickly, but even with the tiny stars invisible from the ground, they seemed to be thinly scattered. They were not all set at the same height, but instead occupied the next few leagues above. It was difficult to tell how far they were, since there was no indication of their size, but occasionally one would make a close approach, evidencing its astonishing speed. Hillalum realized that all the objects in the sky hurtled by with similar speed, in order to travel the world from edge to edge in a day's time.

The Vault of Heaven

They were close enough now to perceive the vault of heaven, to see it as a solid carapace enclosing all the sky. All of the miners spoke in hushed tones, staring up like idiots, while the tower dwellers laughed at them.


Chiang's book is pretty consistent with earlier (Babylonian, Messopotamian, Hebrew, etc) interpretations of cosmology with the Earth at the centre of the firmament with various celestial bodies traveling around it in circles, and with the heavens existing above that all.

enter image description here enter image description here


The twist ending revealed at the end of the book is that the structure of the cosmos is actually a

paradoxical spherical tesseract, with the Vault of Heaven (and everything inside it, including the Earth itself) existing deep within the Earth, recursively.

  • Thanks for your answer. I am puzzled because at the end it digs up into the vault and ends up he surfaces on earth more or less where he started to climb the tower. Now it could be a toroidal world except that “...men had sailed to the edges of the world, and seen the ocean falling away into the mist to join the black waters of the abyss far below”. The world has a edge from which one can fall and the top is connected to the bottom. The story says it is a cylinder. But where does the sun goes once it crossed its dedicated space in the sky? Does it vanishes and come back every morning? – Eva Feb 20 at 19:15
  • @Eva - Hence why it's paradoxical. He finds himself in a surprising place. Having dug directly up, he finds himself back at the bottom. – Valorum Feb 20 at 19:17
  • Ted Chiang: “and then it came to him: a seal cylinder. When rolled upon a tablet of soft clay, the carved cylinder left an imprint that formed a picture. Two figures might appear at opposite ends of the tablet, though they stood side by side on the surface of the cylinder” – Eva Feb 20 at 19:20
  • @Eva - Yes, with his limited understanding of non-euclidian topography he's trying to puzzle out how you could move from a to z without passing through the intervening letters. Obviously we know better. – Valorum Feb 20 at 19:24
  • I was hoping Mr. Chiang had a better solution for the “where the sun goes at night” issue. Nonetheless, great short story! Thanks for your time! – Eva Feb 20 at 19:36
0

The answer can best be described using an analogy the author himself used near the end of the story:

“and then it came to him: a seal cylinder. When rolled upon a tablet of soft clay, the carved cylinder left an imprint that formed a picture. Two figures might appear at opposite ends of the tablet, though they stood side by side on the surface of the cylinder”

Imagine a 2 dimensional universe which has length and height. Lets draw this on a piece of paper. Along the bottom edge of the paper we would draw an island surrounded by water. In the height direction, from the middle of the island to the top of the page, we would draw a line that would be the tower. Then make a cylinder of the page by joining the top of the page to the bottom edge of the page.

If you did this, you would see the top of the tower now touches the underneath side of the island. You can then imagine that if you joined the two ends of the cylinder together, you would have a toroidal universe (ie donut shaped).

So the story describes this by imagining our two dimensional paper now being 3 dimensional space!

  • I felt that this passage was more to do with the protagonist's lack of understanding of non-Euclidian geometry than as an actual, factual description of the universe – Valorum May 8 at 17:05
  • That's ok, except its not an "actual, factual description of the universe". It is just an analogy in 2 dimensions. – Ben Law May 10 at 0:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.