I used to think that Disney-owned Marvel had a pretty clear-cut claim to Wilson Fisk, featuring him in Daredevil since 2015. However, just a few months ago he appeared in Spider-Verse (brought to you by Sony), and now I'm not so sure I know who owns him. How can both studios use him?

  • Did someone make a deal with someone else, like how Disney let Fox change Negasonic Teenage Warhead's powers in exchange for the rights to use Ego in Guardians 2?
  • Is it a Quicksilver-style scenario, where Kingpin exists as part of both the rights to Daredevil and the rights to Spider-Man?
  • Is this all building up to a Kingpin-Verse movie, in which Peter Parker's multidimensional efforts to bring back Uncle Ben end up uniting Vincent D'Onofrio, Liev Schreiber, Michael Clarke Duncan, and Kingpig?
  • 1
    Daredevil is, of course, some sort of co-production with Netflix, who apparently have some degree of exclusivity rights on some of the characters therein. I'm not super-familiar with the business we call show, but I believe it's fairly common for licensing to be limited to a fairly specific medium, e.g. animated movies. – Paul D. Waite Feb 21 '19 at 10:05
  • Also, AFAIR, Kingpin/Wilson Fisk is not in any of Sam Raimy'sSpiderman or Marc Webb's Amazing Spiderman movies, so before the Spider-Verse, it was not clear that rights to Fisk were "tied" to Spiderman. – Taladris May 23 '19 at 0:32

Sony made a deal with Fox where Fox paid them for the use of Kingpin in the Daredevil movie. But when the Daredevil sequel fell through the rights to Daredevil reverted to Marvel. I think actually the rights to Kingpin may have become a bit scattered.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.