Frodo sees Nenya on Galadriel's finger after looking into the Mirror of Galadriel, and yet Sam is unable to see it. Galadriel also says the following:

It is not permitted to speak of it, and Elrond could not do so. But it cannot be hidden from the Ring-bearer, and one who has seen the Eye. Verily it is in the land of Lorien upon the finger of Galadriel that one of the Three remains. This is Nenya, the Ring of Adamant, and I am its keeper.

So does this mean that Frodo would have been able to see both Vilya on Elrond's finger and Narya on Gandalf's finger? I am assuming that the Three are like the One in the sense that they must physically be worn in order to utilise their power. Or does the quote by Galadriel mean that literally only one who is Ring-bearer and one who has seen the Eye is able to see the other rings?

Of course, being able to simply see the rings does not imply he would necessarily know what they were, but clearly Sam was unable to see Galadriel's ring at all. Could Frodo see Narya and Vilya when in Rivendell?


No, the fact that Frodo saw Galadriel's Ring does not mean he saw Elrond's and Gandalf's. After all no mention is made of it, and it is a "big deal" that he saw it on Galadriel's finger. It seems unusual to let it pass if he noticed either Gandalf's or Elrond's so I think it's reasonable to assume that he did not, in fact, see it.

Having said that, I think the key is in the paragraph you quoted:

But it cannot be hidden from the Ring-bearer, and one who has seen the Eye.

Frodo never saw Gandalf or Elrond between seeing the Eye in Galadriel's Mirror and destroying the One Ring. I think it was the combination of the two, being the Ring-bearer and also witnessing Sauron's Eye, that allowed Frodo to perceive Galadriel's Ring given her comment. After all, even in Galariel's case, Frodo did not notice her Ring until after witnessing the Eye in her Mirror.

The Three were definitely seen in the conclusion of the LotR:

Elrond wore a mantle of grey and had a star upon his forehead, and a silver harp was in his hand, and upon his finger was a ring of gold with a great blue stone, Vilya, mightiest of the Three. But Galadriel sat upon a white palfrey ... On her finger was Nenya, the ring wrought of mithril, that bore a single white stone flickering like a frosty star.


Frodo saw that Gandalf now wore openly upon his hand the Third Ring, Narya the Great, and the stone upon it was red as fire.

So it may also be that either Elrond, Galadriel and Gandalf had used their powers to hide the Three, or the Three had an equivalent power that could be turned on and off, and Galadriel chose to reveal her's to Frodo deliberately. It's implied, though not explicit, that Sam could see the Three at this time.

  • Also, Sam saw something on Galadriel's finger, suggesting that she deliberately reviled it. Maybe you could add that to your answer. Still, +1 for the good work. – MadTux Mar 13 '13 at 11:28
  • 1
    "revealed" as in "showed", not "reviled" as in "hated", right? – PoloHoleSet Oct 19 '16 at 20:28

Additionally, Gandalf (and the others) would probably not have worn his ring openly. Galadriel wore it whilst safe in her own lands. I would think Gandalf kept it on a chain around his neck or in a safe place on his person.

  • 7
    What about after he died? "Naked I was sent back" - what did he do with the ring? – Daniel Roseman Jul 30 '12 at 7:06
  • 7
    I'm not sure why, but for some reason the gold watch out of Pulp Fiction springs to mind... – Ash Jul 30 '12 at 12:01
  • 2
    @Daniel Roseman: Wasn't he was sent back to the same place he died, the top of Zirak-Zigil? Whether he was reincarnated into a new body, or simply returned to life in his renewed old one, he could have gathered all his stuff (Glamdring and Narya in particular) before being carried back to Lorien by Gwaihir. I wonder where he got his new staff, though. Lorien, presumably, though I don't recall whether it's ever mentioned. – LAK Mar 18 '15 at 19:39
  • Hmm, he says of his time in Lorien: "Healing I found, and I was clothed in white", but nothing about a staff specifically. Still, Tolkien leaves it uncertain whether Gandalf's staff is indeed anything special, or just an ordinary piece of wood that he is able to empower. – Daniel Roseman Mar 18 '15 at 19:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.