5

In ST: Discovery Context is For Kings Michael Burnham is in a prison transport with prisoners wearing grey jumpsuits, but her jumpsuit uniform (?) is gold with a blank blue Starfleet badge. She was not a member of Starfleet at this time (not reduced, but completely removed as a mutineer). Is this just Hollywood or does making her stand out serve some penal purpose? This seems like putting a bullseye on her back - like placing a cop in prison and giving him a uniform. That won’t end well. Does not sound like Star Fleet standard procedure!

enter image description here

Further information: Star Fleet’s military protocols derive from its origins as the U.S. Navy (Gene Roddenberry). As such they can only reduce military prisoners in rank. This is because if they were “stripped of all rank” as Michael was we would have no more authority over them - they would be civilians (like in the real world where removing ALL rank is a complete discharge).

However, Michael was “stripped of all rank” and still wears a badge. Note that all Starfleet members have a rank, the very lowest is crewman. There have been many times in Star Trek when personnel have been “stripped of rank” which simply means a reduction. 5 members of Equinox in VOY: Equinox pt I were “stripped of rank” this way, making them crewmen (but they were still IN Starfleet. Also, Many resources exist to explain the badge colors, symbols, and rank dots. A blank blue badge does not exist in the Discovery timeline.


note Memory Alpha has inconsistent terminology. The ST universe follows US military protocols because Gene Roddenberry was an Air Force pilot.

  • 1
    Disgraced officer? – Jack B Nimble Sep 24 '19 at 1:39
  • “You shall be stripped of all rank and sentenced to serve life.” She’s not an officer. – Vogon Poet Sep 24 '19 at 3:11
  • Could be some kind of trusteeship or other position of internal authority within the prison. She may be disgraced, but she still presumably has some leadership qualities. – Cadence Sep 24 '19 at 4:40
  • 1
    Why would stripping someone of all rank remove them from the military? That just busts them down to private or whatever the lowest grade is, it removes their rank. It doesn't kick them out of the system. – terdon Sep 24 '19 at 10:01
  • 1
    @VogonPoet to be stripped of your rank means to be demoted to the lowest rung of the hierarchy, but you're still part of that hierarchy. You're just busted back down to whatever rank is the lowest possible. I think you're misunderstanding the phrase. She wasn't drummed out of the army, she was stripped of all rank. – terdon Sep 24 '19 at 13:46
4

Firstly, it's worth noting that the word 'Private' comes from the phrase 'private soldier', first used in medieval Britain to signify an individual hired (or forcibly conscripted) to partake in a military campaign, and were usually allowed to go back to their old life, at least until the next campaign. Back in those days, these individuals were not regarded as fully in the army, but mercenaries at best, or serfs at worst. They were soldiers, but not official members of the Army.

Some basics of this idea has remained in the British Army, and the US as well, in the form of withholding rank insignia until promotion.

In the British Army, the lowest rank of Private (Pte) wears no rank insignia.

In the United States Navy, which Star Trek rank structure emulates, the lowest rank of seaman recruit (E-1) wears no rank insignia, although seaman apprentice (E-2) does.

Navy Rank Insignia

The phrases 'stripped of rank' and 'stripped of all rank' originally comes from the actual act of stripping the current rank, or stripping all ranking insignia from the soldier's uniform, respectively.

Military prisoners are demoted to seaman recruit (E-1) as the most severe punishment, and thus "stripped of all ranking insignia," while in military prison or awaiting discharge. This is to signify that they no longer have a rank that has rank insignia, yet are still subjects of the service.

Thus the phrase 'stripped of all rank' signifies demotion to the lowest rank of Private, and removal of ranking insignia. The phrase does not, by itself, signify discharge from service, although it is common for discharge to follow.

In the case of Michael Burnham, she was tried and sentenced by a Starfleet court-martial rather than a civil one because mutiny is not a civil offense, and thus her sentence must be served before discharge.

As to the question of why the other prisoners wore grey jumpsuits without the Starfleet badge, as pointed out in the answer by Nathan Griffiths, they were civilian prisoners not Starfleet prisoners. Of course, this opens up the issue of why civilian and Starfleet prisoners were travelling together to work the same Starfleet dilithium mine, and the answer is also (partly) to be found in that same piece of dialogue:

Prisoner 1: You hear why we're getting transferred to Tellun? Dilithium pocket went piezoelectric. Ripped apart the bottom of the mine. Bam, 50 cons... vaporized. So, lucky us. We get to be miners for the war effort now.

Prisoner 2: I hear half the screws on Tellun are scumbag Andorians. Andorians are cold in all the wrong places.

Prisoner 1: The three I killed were cold everywhere. That kind of talk got your shiny little panties in a bunch, Starfleet? What are you in for, anyway? Staying out past curfew?

There is a war going on and like during any war, keeping your front-line supplied is absolutely essential. Dilithium is the main source of fuel for Starfleet, and this dialogue infers those civilian prisoners have been sequestered to the dilithium mines to replace the miners killed in an accident. Of course, it still seems a bit of a stretch for Michael Burnham, the first and only convicted Starfleet mutineer, to be there with them, and to answer that we need to look forward to episode 12, Vaulting Ambition.

In this episode it is revealed that Lorca is actually Alternate Universe Lorca, and has been manipulating his way through everything we've seen so far for his own personal reasons. Part of this manipulation involved finding Prime Burnham and getting her onto his ship (due to his relationship with Alternate Universe Burnham).

It is not be a stretch for a Starfleet commander of Lorca's standing to arrange for her transfer to the mines, ensure the Discovery was in place to arrange for the shuttle to get infected with species GS54, and conveniently rescue them. This is all heavily implied when Burnham and Lorca first meet, but only makes sense when the later reveal is made.

Lorca: Michael Burnham. The Michael Burnham, on my ship. When I saw your name on the shuttle manifest, I.. re-read your file. Pulled up your court-martial transcripts, and you're something.

Burnham: Captain, what am I doing on this ship?

Lorca: I guess you might have to ask that storm out there.

Burnham: I received no warning that I'd be transferred to another prison facility, which is customary. Then my shuttle changed course - halfway through the journey.

Lorca: Maybe the universe hates waste.

  • 1
    This is very good however it still doesn't explain why everyone else on the transport had generic grey jumpsuits. If they were headed to the same Starfleet penal dilithium mine on Tellun, doesn't it make sense that they were all Starfleet prisoners? This explanation just misses that fine point - why civilian and Starfleet prisoners would be going to the same facility. Thanks – Vogon Poet Sep 25 '19 at 3:26
  • @Vogon Poet: I've added to the answer to address this point as well. – user118610 Sep 25 '19 at 12:28
  • I put the reference to the other answer directly into your answer, which made some housekeeping needed. I don't think I changed any of the content ot intent. Thanks again – Vogon Poet Sep 25 '19 at 22:04
2

To answer what appears to be the main question (why is Burnham in a gold jumpsuit with blue Star Fleet badge and the other prisoners are in grey jumpsuits):

Burnham is a Star Fleet prisoner and, despite the assertions in the question, she is still part of Star Fleet as being "stripped of all rank" is a demotion, not an expulsion. Most likely prisoners would remain part of Star Fleet until their sentence was complete (for Burnham however it's a life sentence). Therefore she is wearing a Star Fleet prisoner uniform.

The other prisoners on the transport are civilian prisoners, this isn't stated explicitly but is implied in dialog (note they address Burnham as "Starfleet" in a negative way):

Prisoner 1: You hear why we're getting transferred to Tellun? Dilithium pocket went piezoelectric. Ripped apart the bottom of the mine. Bam, 50 cons... vaporized. So, lucky us. We get to be miners for the war effort now.

Prisoner 2: I hear half the screws on Tellun are scumbag Andorians. Andorians are cold in all the wrong places.

Prisoner 1: The three I killed were cold everywhere. That kind of talk got your shiny little panties in a bunch, Starfleet? What are you in for, anyway? Staying out past curfew?

Therefore the other prisoners are wearing standard civilian prisoner uniforms.

0

The US Navy has uniforms for prisoners in the Brig for prolonged periods of time. Could this be the ST Universe version of that?

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/04/29/going-brig-anytime-soon-navy-has-new-uniform.html

  • She was not going to a brig, she was going to prison. Brigs are temporary holding (like a jail vs. prison). Since brigs are on vessels, which are self contained societies,, even prisoners have to be somehow integrated into the society (they still eat, have basic needs, etc.). Rank establishes roles in case of an emergency – Vogon Poet Sep 24 '19 at 17:48
  • Yes, I realize all of that - and when I watched the show I assumed this was the writers' way of giving her a uniform (she needs work clothes) while indicating she has NO rank and is as low on the totem pole as one could get while working on a Star Fleet vessel. – J Crosby Sep 24 '19 at 17:50
  • actually in the link you gave Navy is REMOVING uniforms and issuing more generic clothes - a specific prison uniform in two colors: “Pretrial” and “post-trial.” Currently sailors keep their service uniforms with rank (like Burnham). The reason given, “However, having prisoners wear their service uniform creates security and public safety challenges, such as difficulty in distinguishing staff from prisoners," – Vogon Poet Sep 24 '19 at 18:04
  • @J Crosby - She was on a transport, not working on anything. She obviously changed clothes, and this badge isn’t found in any database. I’m trying to get you to understand the difference between “low on totem pole” and “does not exist on totem pole”. Her “rank” in Starfleet after court-martial would be the same a your own rank in the Canadian Army. Nothing. – Vogon Poet Sep 24 '19 at 18:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.