One of the great things about Dune is the way it works well as a standalone story with a satisfactory ending that, while leaving room open for more, gives a sense of completion to the story.

When he wrote it, did Frank Herbert plan for Dune to be a standalone story, or was it always meant to be part of a wider series with notes and chapters meant for Dune being saved for a future book and a clear multi book arc defined for his main characters in the same way as Robert Jordan, JK Rowling or Brandon Sanderson did/do?

  • 2
    I believe I remember it being mentioned in other questions that Dune, Dune Messiah and Children of Dune were originally intended to be one book. But no idea if he had pre-planned any of the rest to any degree. Feb 19, 2020 at 13:11
  • Something that counts against the books originally being conceived as a series is the time between the books: Dune (1965), Dune Messiah (1969), Children of Dune (1976), God-Emperor (1981). Heretics and Chapterhouse came out within a year of each other and were probably conceived as a whole (with an intended third book). Feb 20, 2020 at 9:34
  • 1
    Although this is very late, for what it’s worth Brian Herbert wrote out the books beyond the sixth based on notes Frank Herbert left behind. Apr 10, 2020 at 6:35

1 Answer 1


It was always meant to be a wider series. From Frank Herbert's forward in Heretics of Dune:

Parts of Dune Messiah and Children of Dune were written before Dune was completed. They fleshed out more in the writing, but the essential story remained intact. I was a writer and I was writing.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.