I know of Odd John but probably much earlier. Not sure if Dracula's intelligence was supposed to be superhuman or his great age just made him wise -- same thing with The Wandering Jew, maybe. Frankenstein's Monster was very intelligent but not sure if that was due to the brain used or the process used.

  • 13
    "Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us." Sounds like those Martians were "super-intelligent"? Do they count?
    – user14111
    Jul 28, 2020 at 9:09
  • 2
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_knowledge_deities - not Science Fiction, but that requirement is completely arbitrary anyways Jul 29, 2020 at 6:46
  • 5
    Downvoted because you didn't define "super-intelligent" other than by comparison to other characters. I would vote to close as unclear if I could. Jul 29, 2020 at 6:58
  • 2
    Eve became super intelligent when she bit into that apple from the tree of super knowledge of good and evil...
    – PatrickT
    Jul 30, 2020 at 8:05
  • 1
    Might be nice to link to Odd John, as you give him as an example. I, for one, have no clue who that might be. Can always Google of course, but a direct link to maybe the description you think is relevant, might help.
    – Gnudiff
    Jul 30, 2020 at 12:33

5 Answers 5


In terms of characters who are "superintelligent" for science fictional reasons rather than simply being exceptionally intelligent human beings, one early one is the 1879 story "The Ablest Man in the World" by Edward Page Mitchell, featuring a cyborg character who had a kind of clockwork computer, said in the story to be similar (but superior) to the real-life difference engine created by Charles Babbage, implanted into his skull (seemingly replacing his brain entirely rather than augmenting it), giving him superior mental abilities. The story can be read online at Project Gutenberg here. Here is the character Dr. Rapperschwyll describing the creation of the cyborg:

"My endeavors in mechanism had resulted in a machine which went far beyond Babbage's in its powers of calculation. Given the data, there was no limit to the possibilities in this direction. Babbage's cogwheels and pinions calculated logarithms, calculated an eclipse. It was fed with figures, and produced results in figures. Now, the relations of cause and effect are as fixed and unalterable as the laws of arithmetic. Logic is, or should be, as exact a science as mathematics. My new machine was fed with facts, and produced conclusions. In short, it reasoned; and the results of its reasoning were always true, while the results of human reasoning are often, if not always, false. The source of error in human logic is what the philosophers call the `personal equation.' My machine eliminated the personal equation; it proceeded from cause to effect, from premise to conclusion, with steady precision. The human intellect is fallible; my machine was, and is, infallible in its processes.


"Once more: a profound study of history from the sociological point of view, and a not inconsiderable practical experience of human nature, had convinced me that the greatest geniuses that ever existed were on a plane not so very far removed above the level of average intellect. The grandest peaks in my native country, those which all the world knows by name, tower only a few hundred feet above the countless unnamed peaks that surround them. Napoleon Bonaparte towered only a little over the ablest men around him. Yet that little was everything, and he overran Europe. A man who surpassed Napoleon, as Napoleon surpassed Murat, in the mental qualities which transmute thought into fact, would have made himself master of the whole world.

"Now, to fuse these three propositions into one: suppose that I take a man, and, by removing the brain that enshrines all the errors and failures of his ancestors away back to the origin of the race, remove all sources of weakness in his future career. Suppose, that in place of the fallible intellect which I have removed, I endow him with an artificial intellect that operates with the certainty of universal laws. Suppose that I launch this superior being, who reasons truly, into the burly burly of his inferiors, who reason falsely, and await the inevitable result with the tranquillity of a philosopher.

"Monsieur, you have my secret. That is precisely what I have done. In Moscow, where my friend Dr. Duchat had charge of the new institution of St. Vasili for hopeless idiots, I found a boy of eleven whom they called Stépan Borovitch. Since he was born, he had not seen, heard, spoken or thought. Nature had granted him, it was believed, a fraction of the sense of smell, and perhaps a fraction of the sense of taste, but of even this there was no positive ascertainment. Nature had walled in his soul most effectually. Occasional inarticulate murmurings, and an incessant knitting and kneading of the fingers were his only manifestations of energy. On bright days they would place him in a little rocking-chair, in some spot where the sun fell warm, and he would rock to and fro for hours, working his slender fingers and mumbling forth his satisfaction at the warmth in the plaintive and unvarying refrain of idiocy. The boy was thus situated when I first saw him.

"I begged Stépan Borovitch of my good friend Dr. Duchat. If that excellent man had not long since died he should have shared in my triumph. I took Stépan to my home and plied the saw and the knife. I could operate on that poor, worthless, useless, hopeless travesty of humanity as fearlessly and as recklessly as upon a dog bought or caught for vivisection. That was a little more than twenty years ago. To-day Stépan Borovitch wields more power than any other man on the face of the earth. In ten years he will be the autocrat of Europe, the master of the world. He never errs; for the machine that reasons beneath his silver skull never makes a mistake."

  • 2
    That is quite a find! cyborg 140 years ago -- never heard of this! he should have asked this cyborg for help with the title of the story, however. Everyone should look the author up -- he is somehow not very well known but you will be amazed about the ideas he had before Wells.
    – releseabe
    Jul 28, 2020 at 17:42
  • "Napoleon Bonaparte towered only a little over the ablest men around him." What would possess an author to write this? Is it satire?
    – kojiro
    Jul 29, 2020 at 10:46
  • 2
    @kojiro It seems to be used here in a figurative sense, describing Napoleon's intelligence, since the next sentence says that "that little was everything". Using height as a metaphor may just be an unfortunate coincidence.
    – Milo P
    Jul 29, 2020 at 16:10
  • @kojiro Read in the context of the cited paragraph he is clearly referring to " ... his level of intellect ...". Jul 31, 2020 at 7:07

Despite the possible identification of The War of the Worlds (1898), I'm going to suggest a slightly later work because I'm not sure that The War of the Worlds satisfies the character requirement.

The SF Encyclopedia entry on "Intelligence" notes:

the first of real importance was The Hampdenshire Wonder (1911; exp vt The Wonder 1917) by J D Beresford, in which the focus of interest is on the feelings of a superintelligent child growing up in a world of what seem to him subnormals.

On the basis of this, I'm going to suggest The Hampdenshire Wonder (1911) (gutenberg link) as the first story featuring a super-intelligent character (Victor Stott) who is actually developed and portrayed in the story.

As a four-and-a-half year old child, Victor reads the entirety of the Oxford English Dictionary (in 2 days) and the Encyclopaedia Britannica in the balance of 3 weeks. In linear order, absorbing the material wholesale and filling in the gaps in the earliest readings with material from what is read later. He reaches the encyclopaedia's index, recognizes that it is inferior to his internal cross-indexing and then starts trying to explain all the deficiencies in what he has just read. "Trying" simply because - knowing the entire vocabulary of English and the technical subjects covered in the encyclopaedia - there are not words for the insights he has drawn.

  • thanks. whether earliest example or not, never heard of it and i have been reading classic scifi for more than half a century in a family of science fiction readers. i will check it out.
    – releseabe
    Jul 28, 2020 at 12:01
  • 1
    I note that Odd John's author was influenced by Beresford. Prodigies have always been of interest and so a science fiction story about one who is beyond what humanity has so far produced seems natural. I would guess that there were always kids who spoke really young and exaggerations about them might also be called fiction.
    – releseabe
    Jul 28, 2020 at 13:05
  • 3
    @releseabe I can't find a reference at the moment, but I read an essay a couple of decades ago about the problem of writing a truly super-intelligent character; writing one as a child was one of the handful of ways discussed to reasonably approach super-intelligence. The problem being that no human author has any way of inserting themselves into the consciousness of a true super-intelligence to write it as a viewpoint character. Flowers for Algernon subverts this by having Charlie write a journal that's (in-story) intended to be read by normal humans.
    – DavidW
    Jul 28, 2020 at 14:15
  • @DavidW - two other works that take the child route are "Star Bright" and Children of the Atom. Jul 28, 2020 at 18:45
  • @DavidW: Interesting and perhaps related to the idea that IQ tests were meant to identify students who might, due to being subnormal, need special help whereas at the top end, how could one write a test that reliably identifies people who are extremely able? You might note that some people have unusual digit span recall, etc. That is why I find discussions of Einstein's IQ (which seem to come up a lot) extremely cringey.
    – releseabe
    Jan 25, 2023 at 10:38

I'm tempted to include Jules Verne's stories here.

20,000 Leagues Under the Sea was first published in 1870. It is rather steampunk , which I consider a subgenre of sci-fi - though I believe the terms steampunk and science fiction did not exist back then.

The story features Pierre Aronnax and Captain Nemo, two huge nerds - the kind that would probably have multiple accounts in Stack Exchange network if they lived nowadays, probably with 100K+ reputation in the more science oriented sites.

Captain Nemo in particular was genius enough to build a futuristic submarine (for 1870's standards). He extracted all the materials he needed to fuel and maintain his submarine from the oceans, which involves huge feats of engineering, chemistry, physics and even biology. On top of that, the fictitious machine could perform better than real life submarines from the late 1900's in terms of maneuverability, endurance and navigation.

To add to Nemo's displays of genius, he also had a fully functional prosthetic hand,* could speak multiple languages (French, English, Latin, German and at least one language spoken in India (unspecified, could be Hindi or Punjabi for example)), collects art, discourses on philosophy and is an accomplished organ player.

Vernes had previously written From the Earth to the Moon, which also features people engineering hard to solve a problem. In it he basically figured a way to take people to the Moon in 1864. However, rather than feats of invention by geniuses in order to make the journey possible, the characters in this book merely used well-known Newtonian physics and scaled a canon up to shoot a manned bullet at the Moon. In my opinion that is not as clever as what Nemo did with his submarine.

* I had initially mentioned Nemo having a prosthetic hand. That was actually something done in a 1997 movie, but in the book Nemo does not have a prosthetic hand.

  • 5
    stories that include very bright people go all the way back to Greek mythology but that is different than having a character who is notable because of abnormal intellect. Odd John is about someone of superhuman genius who does accomplish things later whereas Nemo and other Verne characters are presented because of what they have already accomplished.
    – releseabe
    Jul 28, 2020 at 17:12
  • 1
    Hmm. There is nothing about him having a prosthetic arm in my edition which was translated from French at around 1945-50ies.
    – Gnudiff
    Jul 30, 2020 at 12:31
  • @Gnudiff you are right! I was actually remembering a movie, not the original book. I'll fix that.
    – Marvel Boy
    Jul 30, 2020 at 13:01

Any advance on 1752: Voltaire's Micromégas?

It might even count as the first science fiction story, period.

Micromégas is a child only 450 years old from a planet that orbits Sirius, when he writes a heretical book about the insects on his planet, for which he is banished. He travels the universe to develop his intellect. He meets the secretary of the Academy of Saturn, and together they visit the Earth. Microgmégas is 37 km tall, his friend only 1.8 km tall.

On Earth, they first believe that there is no intelligent life, but eventually find a ship full of philosophers (scientists) returning from an Arctic expedition. They have no difficulty in creating a listening device so that they can hear the voices of the tiny humans, and they learn human language very quickly in order to communicate. They find it hilarious that humans think that the universe was created solely for the benefit of humankind.

  • 1
    I was thinking about that one too, but I wasn't sure Micromégas was super intelligent.
    – user14111
    Jul 29, 2020 at 11:24
  • 4
    Making a listening device out of fingernail clippings is not the sort of thing that your average, run of the mill, everyday super-intelligent hero does, is it? Jul 29, 2020 at 11:37
  • 3
    @user14111 being called a heretic and then banished for doing science is something that happens to geniuses.
    – Marvel Boy
    Jul 29, 2020 at 18:52

Found an even earlier candidate than my last answer. On p. 186 of Science Fiction: The Early Years by Everett Bleiler, viewable on google books here, there is a synopsis for an 1854 book by C. I. Defontenay, the original French title is Star ou Psi de Cassiopée, histoire merveilleuse de l'un des mondes de l'espace, translated into English as Star (Psi Cassiopeia). The story deals with historical accounts of an alien planet called "Star" in the system of Psi Cassiopeia, records which were found in a meteorite on Earth. Several different types of intelligent beings live on the planet, including "humans" much like ourselves, but also a more intelligent species:

Superior to both humans and repleus are the Nemsedes or Longevouses, who amount to a rational version of culture heroes or demigods. They are very few in number, perhaps only a hundred at their most numerous period, nine-feet tall, blue-haired, sexless and nonreproductive, passionless, intellectually superior to man, and nearly immortal save by accident. They seem to have been a spontaneous creation during the period of the planet’s greatest life force, for they all appeared at once and had no parents. The Nemsedes have had a long history in guiding Starian civilization.

I picked up an English translation on kindle and searched for the section on them--their name is here translated as "The Nemsèdes, or Longevites" and the account of them says:

Those people, who were endowed with superior reason, who had lived and reflected so long, were soon regarded with the utmost respect and admiration by all Starians. A great number of them decided to leave the island of Tastot in order to bring to the other peoples the lessons of their experience and wisdom. Among other humans, almost all the Longevites, incapable of physical passions, became enamored of an art or a science. Each of them pursued his preferred science or art without pause through the centuries; their influence on the progress of Star was great, and would have been even greater had it not been for the evils which later decimated the planet’s people.

Perhaps "superior reason" is ambiguous--one might make a comparison to Spock on Star Trek, who often is shown having superior ability to make mathematical and scientific deductions along with other types, but probably would not be considerd "super-intelligent".

This site is temporarily in read-only mode and not accepting new answers.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .