18

In Ursula K. LeGuin's The Lathe of Heaven, both the paperback and the Amazon Kindle eBook fail to note what George Orr had in his coffee.

pg. 114

He took Orr down to the food machines, and got him a roast beef sandwich, an egg and tomato sandwich, two apples, four chocolate bars, and two cups of coffee with.

I remember the next word as "everything", presumably from a library hardcover --- but the novel was originally serialized in Amazing Stories Magazine --- was the text there complete?

Improve this question
4
  • 1
    That's what the Internet Archive is four. It's just "coffee with". Just search for the word "coffee". archive.org/details/Amazing_Stories_v45n01_1971-05
    – user14111
    Commented Dec 23, 2020 at 0:41
  • Ending sentences with prepositions is what ELU is for.
    – Mazura
    Commented Dec 24, 2020 at 4:29
  • 1
    "coffee with" just means w/ milk and sugar.
    – Fattie
    Commented Dec 24, 2020 at 18:44
  • @Fattie - Ahem
    – Valorum
    Commented Dec 29, 2020 at 21:55

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
25

The original publication in the May 1973 issue of Amazing Science Fiction has exactly that text. (The link should take you to the correct page with "coffee" highlighted.)

I expect that is simply an idiomatic English usage that is somewhat archaic now. I've heard it more often in a sentence like "I went to the store and John came with." The missing antecedent "me" is implied by the structure of the sentence. (There being nothing/nobody else for John to be with.)

In this case I read that sentence as "...got him a roast beef sandwich, an egg and tomato sandwich, two apples, four chocolate bars, and two cups of coffee [to go with all that]."

Improve this answer
5
  • Of course in the first part of the novel they seemed to have coffee with brandy a fair bit, so if you're used to seeing that it could be even more confusing.
    – DavidW
    Commented Dec 23, 2020 at 0:58
  • 2
    I've heard this a lot from UK speakers: "I'm going for a walk; want to come with?", and is how I would have interpreted the LeGuin passage before seeing Valorum's answer. In the absence of "come" or "go" I'm now thinking "coffee with" means the usual add-ins.
    – CCTO
    Commented Dec 23, 2020 at 15:51
  • 4
    'Want to come with?' is very colloquial, I would interpret it be regarding with or without milk as specified by the people above.
    – Tom
    Commented Dec 23, 2020 at 18:07
  • 3
    This answer is simply completely wrong and the other answer is correct. I suggest deleting it.
    – Fattie
    Commented Dec 24, 2020 at 18:44
  • 4
    @Fattie - It has value because it confirms that the original wording is correct.
    – Valorum
    Commented Dec 24, 2020 at 22:10
40

This is idiomatic (US/UK) English. He had his coffee with [milk and sugar].

"Do you wish your tea or coffee to be with or without sugar or with or without milk? How do you like your tea? With or without? Do you drink your coffee with or without?"

McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. © 2002

The lady who owned my local greasy spoon used to ask people if they wanted "tea with or tea without". If the customer wanted anything special (e.g. two sugars) the onus was on them to be more specific.

Improve this answer
13
  • 3
    This answer was much helped by the fact that I've actually heard the expression used in a real setting. The slang dictionary reference is merely a flourish.
    – Valorum
    Commented Dec 23, 2020 at 1:31
  • 2
    In Holland, you might buy a portion of chips/fries and be asked "with or without", where the implied word is "mayonnaise". I imagine there are a bunch of other examples in different places and contexts where something has an accompaniment so common as to be default, but not universal.
    – IMSoP
    Commented Dec 23, 2020 at 11:31
  • 2
    Discussion about "down to" vs "up to", while interesting, is not directly relevant to the Q&A here and has been moved to chat.
    – Rand al'Thor ♦
    Commented Dec 24, 2020 at 12:47
  • 1
    I dislike the slang "dictionary" quote, Valo. It's just confusing. the quote does not* actually use the term "coffee with" as such. It's just a few long sentences that start with "coffee with milk" and "lead up to" saying "Do you drink your coffee with or without" The phrase in question is simply not used. It's a horrible confusing reference.
    – Fattie
    Commented Dec 29, 2020 at 22:59
  • 1
    @Fattie I don't see any evidence that "coffee with" was ever a set phrase (and I've consumed a decent amount of media from the 70s). "With or without" in the context of coffee, yes. "One lump or two", yes. But "coffee with." just means someone stopped in the middle of the sentence. Even if a character would use that as slang, it doesn't appear to be in dialog or in first person. It looks like a third person narrator. In the other quotes that I can find from that book, the third person narrator is written with "correct" grammar, no slang.
    – user3067860
    Commented Dec 30, 2020 at 13:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.