18

Horcruxes are rare (and then seven come along at once...) and only a few people know about them.

But when was the last Horcrux before Voldemort's? 50 years before him? Centuries? Millennia?

14

I'm going to limit this question to "among the known users of Horcrux's".

In which case the answer is: 2600 to 2800 years ago.
But... I'd say it's sufficient to say more than 2000 years ago.

The most recent Horcrux-er other than Voldemort is Herpo the Foul1.

Depending on how loosely you want to take the description of Herpo the Foul who was said to be a wizard in "Ancient Greece", which is traditionally described to be 600 to 800 BC.

There are no other known creators of Horcrux's.
While there is only negative evidence to support this (that Herpo was the 2nd most recent user), the HP Wiki notices the same thing. So, while there's no canon, the negative evidence is generally accepted as proof.

1. 2007 interview

  • 2
    I don't disagree with this post, but Harry Potter Wikia is an abhorrently awful source. If you could provide a better reference, the answer would be stronger. – Gabe Willard Oct 19 '12 at 17:27
  • Deleting my source doesn't help the fact that negative evidence is the only thing we have to answer this question with. – Gorchestopher H Oct 19 '12 at 17:40
  • 1
    I'm not asking you to delete the source. I'm suggesting that you provide a better source. Negative evidence is fine, but any evidence at all that is from an awful source is academically useless. Certainly if this were true, and I don't really doubt it is, there would be evidence from JKR somewhere. – Gabe Willard Oct 19 '12 at 17:48
  • 1
    Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them – Gorchestopher H Oct 19 '12 at 19:54
  • 1
    @Pureferret - in interviews – DVK-on-Ahch-To Oct 20 '12 at 12:48
4

It’s unknown who was the most recent, but there were others.

While the Dark Lord’s method of creating multiple Horcruxes was previously unheard of, making one Horcrux seemed to be at least somewhat known, since there was quite a bit of information about it in Secrets of the Darkest Art, including how to protect them, how Horcruxes could possess others if they get emotionally attached to them, that the soul can heal by remorse, and how to destroy them.

“This is the one that gives explicit instructions on how to make a Horcrux. Secrets of the Darkest Art – it’s a horrible book, really awful, full of evil magic.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 6 (The Ghoul in Pyjamas)

We don’t know who the most recent one before the Dark Lord was, but from the sheer amount of information on them in Secrets of the Darkest Art (which was quite an ancient book), there would have certainly been enough people who’d done it for that amount of information to exist.

We do have an idea who the first one to make a Horcrux is. In an interview, J.K. Rowling says that Herpo the Foul was the one who’d created the first Horcrux. He therefore almost certainly wasn’t the most recent to make one before the Dark Lord, unless all the information in Secrets of the Darkest Art came from Herpo’s one experience, which seems incredibly unlikely.

SU: Oh, Jo, but those "horcruxes", though, I tell you, they're so much to ask still about those, you know?... I mean, who, okay, we have to know. Who created the first Horcrux? Was it Grindelwald? Salazar? Who did that?

JKR: D'you know what, I've got a feeling it was Herpo, which is H-E-R-P-O.

SU: Herpo the Foul?

JKR: ... Herpo the Foul, exactly, yeah. Yeah. But you know wizards would've been looking for ways to do exactly what Voldemort did for years, and some of the ways they would've tried would've killed them, so I imagine it... well, there's huge parallels. Splitting the atom would be a very good parallel in our world. Something that people imagined might be able to be done, but couldn't quite bring it off, and then... and then people started doing it with sometimes catastrophic effects. So that's how I see the Horcrux.
- PotterCast Interview, (December 17th, 2007)

However, the only thing we can say for sure about whoever was the most recent to make a Horcrux before the Dark Lord is that they would have been a Dark wizard, otherwise it would be unthinkable to them.

  • Are you implying Voldemort had emotions? – Janus Bahs Jacquet Apr 1 '18 at 17:32
  • @JanusBahsJacquet No, I know better than that! Where do you think I imply that? – Bellatrix Apr 1 '18 at 19:26
  • I think I may have misread you. I read “Horcruxes could possess others if they [=the Horcruxes] get emotionally attached to them [=the victims]”, which implies that the Horcruxes (and by extension their creators) must have emotions. Re-reading, I’m guessing you meant the victims became emotionally attached to the Horcruxes rather than vice versa. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Apr 1 '18 at 19:30
  • @JanusBahsJacquet Yes, that’s what I meant! The book says Horcruxes can possess others if the victim becomes emotionally attached to the Horcrux, like what happened with Tom Riddle’s diary. – Bellatrix Apr 1 '18 at 19:33
0

Seeing as how the point of a horcrux is to prevent them from dying and letting people know would kind of ruin that prospect if someone destroyed the horcrux, I would have to say that we would be very unlikely to know who else used horcruxes.

For all we know it could be relatively (keyword being relatively) common for anyone willing to commit murder to make a horcrux. Even if they didn't do it on the scale of Voldemort its pretty tempting to have that sort of protection from death. (Obviously this is all speculation on my part)

  • You're right, you do rely on speculation here a lot, but it's good speculation in that it makes a lot of sense. The thing is though, I'm not sure it is true in Harry Potter cannon. In their answer, Gorchestopher H links to this interview If you start reading from "Oh, Jo, but those "horcruxes", though, I tell you, they're so much to ask still about those, you know?" there's a lot of good information in there and there's some book canon on the subject as well – Au101 Jan 31 '17 at 23:41
  • You could really make a good answer out of this, I think, if you tried to bring in some of that information. Jo's answer where she talks about splitting the atom can definitely be interpreted either way. It doesn't sound like it'd be a common thing for murderers to do, and it's certainly not easy, but then she does say "and then people started doing it" which might suggest that it's not just Voldemort and Herpo but there were a few in between, so you can interpret it both ways. If you were to bring some of that out, I think you'd have a great answer here – Au101 Jan 31 '17 at 23:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.