Don't get me wrong, I love Alien, but there seems to be extreme inconsistency in how fast it grows.

Out of curiosity, is a canonical answer ever offered for how the life cycle in Alien Covenant is a tiny fraction of every other Alien movie?

Bonus: Do Aliens eat to grow? I don't mean trying to explain it scientifically - I mean an in universe explanation. It just seems odd that the Alien appears to grow from nothing.

  • @DavidW I feel like the Bonus question is more about 'properly' explaining the science behind it. As an alien I doubt it follows things like the Krebs cycle though.
    – AncientSwordRage
    Jul 12, 2021 at 15:38
  • Chia pets grow very quickly.
    – Valorum
    Jul 12, 2021 at 15:55
  • Inconsistency? Well, comparing to original Alien there's none, Aliens don't show growth, slow or fast, in 3 it's pretty rapid, in 4 I can't remember any solid reference points but how long might it be between cloning of R. and pirates showing up? Is it curious? Yes. Incostistent along franchise? Not really.
    – zubergu
    Jul 12, 2021 at 22:24
  • 1
    It occurs to me that Alien goes from egg to skinhead squirrel hosted by Kane in a couple of hours without vampirizing Kane excessively. It would say to realistically do that, it would probably have to go through 50% Kane at least (and dump the detritus somewhere, too). It really needs access to a storage space, including a heat sink, in another dimension. Jul 12, 2021 at 22:33
  • @DavidTonhofer Do we know how much they weigh? They might make very chemically efficient use of what they start with, and end up being very light weight at maturity. Really, we can only speculate.
    – BlackThorn
    Jul 13, 2021 at 0:26

1 Answer 1


I can't offer you much of a "canonical" answer for your perceived inconsistency, but I would posit that "canon" in the Alien films is a bit of an odd...uh...beast anyway. As to Ridley Scott there isn't much of canon other than his 3 films and even if we decide to view all the Alien films and the Predator films as sharing a canonical universe, then it easily becomes a bit littered with incongruencies that you somewhat have to accept as different interpretations by different film-makers.

That being said, I don't think there actually is much of an inconsistency here. We really only have one other instance of a somewhat closed life cycle we can compare it to, and that is the Nostromo Alien from the eponymous film. In all other films we don't really get to follow individual aliens around and for all we know, the "adults" we encounter could be days old, or just hours if not minutes.

So let's look at the first film, where the alien also grows really fast. If you remember it gets given "birth" by Kane and quickly runs away. The crew then goes searching for it. It's not quite clear after how long, Ash built some kind of motion tracker meanwhile (if he didn't already have it ready, being rather ahead of the matter all the time). But it's likely not more than a few hours if even that. You don't want this thing run around too long on your ship.

But the point is, even the crew still thought it was just the size of a cat like when it slipped out of Kane. They find its skin, hinting at a rather quick growth process and later when it kills its first victim Brett, Parker realizes that it's the size of a big man and is rather surprised at that.

The son of a bitch is huge! I mean, it's like a man. It's big!

So to reiterate, we don't really know how long it took to grow that big, but it's probably not longer than an hour and nothing says it didn't just happen in 5 minutes after the alien ran away. It sure grows really quickly. I would agree it all seems rather fast in Alien: Covenant, but not unusual in comparison to Alien, and also quite in line with the theme of a "perfect organism" that the films often try to evoke.

Add to this, that for all we know the Covenant alien might still be a somewhat different strand of evolution than the one later encountered by the Nostromo, even though it already is David's final creation and comes very close to the alien we know and love fear. But I think it still looks a bit different and generally "bulkier" than the one from the first film. (However, that again might still be down to just different filmic interpretations.)

But as to how it can grow so quickly, I neither am able to answer this from a xenobiological standpoint, nor do I think it really makes sense to reason about the Alien lifecycle's actual plausibility (if that is even considered on-topic). For all the thought that is put into these creatures and their supposed perfection, it still is rather made-up and doesn't always make perfect sense nor has to adhere to all too narrow biological restrictions. For example it's even "worse" than you think when you say "the first thing it eats ostensibly are the humans", because I think the bodies they find in Alien: Covenant are surprisingly intact and the aliens seem to deliberately not eat their hosts (like Oram or Lope) or even the people they kill (like Rosenthal). We really don't know how they actually function, but I don't think that's much of a problem. Add to this again the different interpreations by different film-makers that introduce their own inconsistencies (e.g. in the first Alien film it was thought to turn humans into eggs, while later films added the concept of a queen).

  • 3
    That would have been a nice addition to the movie: the crew finding bites taken out of plastics, aluminum and metal, and maybe a large stash of actual food, getting progressively larger. Also, the oxygen quality readings indicating that something is burning furiously somewhere. Jul 12, 2021 at 21:06
  • I'd also add, and correct me if I'm wrong, in Aliens... Ridley goes from not knowing how to shoot a gun ("how does the grenade launcher work? you started this") to locking-and-loading on the fly a few hours later... Doesn't seem to be a lot of consistency for being a good movie.
    – WernerCD
    Jul 13, 2021 at 0:07
  • @DavidTonhofer I don't remember the first movie clearly, but didn't they find indications that the Alien could eat inorganic parts of the ship?
    – kutschkem
    Jul 13, 2021 at 7:26
  • @kutschkem Not that I can remember. Maybe in Alan Dean Foster's novelization? Jul 13, 2021 at 8:40
  • @WernerCD Neither a flamethrower nor a grenade launcher is a weapon known to require much in the way of accuracy, and none of the things she shoots with them is particularly small or mobile. Jul 31, 2022 at 10:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.