24

In several Star Trek episodes, the ship visits planets with a Name + Number designation like Eminiar VII, but there is no shortage of planets, like Earth, Vulcan, and Romulus, that don't have numbers after them.

Is there an in-universe reason for some planets to have a name + a number, and some to have just a name? In-universe, aliens seem to have no issue saying they are from Eminiar VII, and from a (very human) usability stand-point, it seems it would make more sense to name each planet like we currently do (Earth, Mars, Europa) and simply use those designations as (in-universe) there aren't that many M class planet colonies.

3
  • 6
    Note that we already use a similar sort of numbering system for any exoplanets that we've discovered. (Actually we use letters rather than numbers, but it's the same idea.) The name of each exoplanet is the name of the star followed by a letter, though given in the order discovered, rather than distance from the star - which obviates the need to rename planets when closer ones are detected later. Sep 27 at 14:18
  • Doubtful there is an in-universe explanation. Consider that there would be a good reason to not give real-world catalog designations to fictional settings. Although we might infer a real star around which the fictional planet Vulcan orbits, it can remain a fictional world until someone gives it a tangible location in the cosmos.
    – Anthony X
    Sep 27 at 19:21
  • Probably for similar reasons why in common English we have names for planets like "Earth" or "Terra" but also "Gliese 876 b"? The ones that are more important to us are glorified by names more unique and 'namey' than index numbers. :)
    – Lexible
    Sep 28 at 1:50
64

The Name + number designation is usually the name of the star, plus the number of the planet in distance from the star. By this standard, Earth is often called Sol-3 in various science fiction works. Khan was marooned on Ceti Alpha V, which means the fifth planet from the star Ceti Alpha.

Planets with a name are usually (always?) inhabited. It is usually the name given by the native race that evolved on the planet.

15
  • 1
    Although, of the examples given, Romulus, Remus and Vulcan are obviously from Earth mythology. EU writers have tried to explain that, from time to time.
    – Davislor
    Sep 27 at 14:49
  • 13
    I think the planets with a name are more than just planets that are inhabited. I think they're planets that are home to a civilization that is sufficiently advanced that it has been able to announce the name of their planet to the rest of the galaxy.
    – aleppke
    Sep 27 at 17:41
  • 10
    @CCTO You can rationalize it by taking "Ceti Alpha V" to be the translation into English of that location. Another civilization would have that location translated into their equivalent of "Ceti Alpha".
    – Peter M
    Sep 27 at 17:59
  • 2
    @Davislor Was going to jokingly invoke the universal translator until I realized it makes some sense. Sep 27 at 20:36
  • 2
    @DarrelHoffman “When we found out that the stars we’d called Rigel and Centauri had inhabited planets orbiting them, we named them after the star in our langugae,” makes sense. There is, however, no star named Vulcan. And it turns out that the Vulcans made First Contact with humans before we even left out solar system, so it’s not as if we’d explored their world and given it an arbitrary mythological name before we knew there were people living there.
    – Davislor
    Sep 28 at 14:17
18

Short Answer:

In many cases the names of Star Trek planets correctly follow the planet naming conventions established in science fiction decades before TOS was first broadcast. In other cases they fail to follow the science fiction conventions accurately.

Long Answer:

Many of the few thousand stars which can be seen from Earth without telescopes, which are a tiny fraction of all the billions of stars in our galaxy, have proper names in one or more Earth cultures.

I own a copy of Star Names Their Lore and Meaning, by Richard HInckley Allen, 1899, 1963, which spends hundreds of pages listing and discussing the names of various stars in differnt cultures.

Many stars also have designations in various catalogs.

In 1603 a man named Bayer printed a star atlas with maps of the sky. And in it he printed new designations beside most of the stars. Each Bayer designition consisted of a lower case greek letter and the genitive case of the constellation's name in Latin.

Since most people don't recognize Greek letters, it is now very common to spell out the Greek letter in a Bayer designation. Thus a constellation like Centaurus will have stars with Bayer designations of Alpha Centauri, Beta Centauri, Gamma Centauri, Delta Centauri, and so on down to the last letter in the Greek alphabet, Omega, as in Omega Centauri.

With some constellations Bayer ran out of stars before he used all the Greek letters, and with other constellations Bayer ran out of Greek letters before he got to all of the stars.

In the 18th century a star catalog by Astronomer Royal John Flamsteed gave Flamsteed designations to the stars listed. All the stars "in" a constellation were numbered in order of right ascension, followed by the genitive case of the constellation's name in Latin. So the star Omicron2 Eridani is also known as 40 Eridani (and is probably the star that the planet Vulcan in Star Trek orbits).

There have been tens, and hundreds, and thousands, of other star catalogs created since then, listing tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, and millions, of other stars, most of which can be seen from Earth only through telescopes.

And usually a star, in a star catalog, is listed with the name of the catalog or an abbreviation of that name, followed by its number in the catalog. And many stars have several different catalog designations.

Here is a link to Wikipedia's List of nearby Stars and brown dwarfs, which lists them out to a distance of 5 parsecs, which is a little over 16 light years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_stars_and_brown_dwarfs

So, you should read the list of stars and look at their designations, and also note that many of them have more than one designation listed (and they may have others which are not listed there).

Some of them are listed under proper names, (and also have Bayer designations) such as Sirius (Alpha Canis Majoris) and Procyon (Alpha Canis Minoris).

Others are listed under their Bayer designations, such as Alpha Centauri, Epsilon Eridani, Tau Ceti, and Epsilon Indi.

Some are listed under their Flamsteed designations, such as 61 Cygni and 40 Eridani.

And most are listed under their designations in many different star catalogs.

In the early 20th century science fiction became a separate genre with its own conventions. Space opera stories about interstellar travel often had spacemen visit alien planets which orbited distant stars. Sometimes those planets were nameless, sometimes Earth explorers gave them names, and sometimes the names used by native intelligent beings were used.

And sometimes the stars which those alien planets orbited were mentioned. Sometimes they were stars known to Earth people with Earth designations including proper names, Bayer designations, Flamsteed designations, catalog numbers, etc. And sometimes those stars had imaginary names given by Earth explorers, or names given by any natives their planets might have.

And science fiction writers developed another system of referring to alien planets. They would call them by the name or other designation of their star followed by numbers in the order of distance from their star. And those numbers are sometimes written out and sometimes given as Roman numerals.

So, in our solar system Mercury is Sol One or Sol I, Venus is Sol Two or Sol II, Earth is Sol Three or Sol III, Mars is Sol Four or Sol IV, Jupiter is Sol Five or Sol V, Saturn is Sol Six or Sol VI, etc., sometimes extended to as yet undiscovered planets in the solar system.

This may have been suggested by the practice of giving the many moons of the giant planets Roman numerals.

For example, There are a number of such planet designations in E.E. Smith's Lensman series. As one example, in Second stage Lensman (1941-42, 1953) there is a star named Trallis in the Second Galaxy. Two of its planets are important in the plot, Tralle (Trallis III) and Onlo (Trallis IX).

In the last 30 years or so astronomers on Earth have discovered over 4,000 exoplanets orbiting around other stars. The usual designation practice is different from that of science fiction writers; the planets are given lower case Latin letters in order of discovery, so the first planet discovered orbiting a star is (Starname) b, the second planet discovered is (Starname) c, and so on.

The various writers of Star Trek episodes were and are more or less familiar with the naming practices of science fiction, and so their star names and planet names follow science fiction conventions to a greater or lesser degree.

This article at the ex Astris scientia website discusses the star names in Star Trek and how well they agree with real star names.

https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/bayer-names.htm

Anyway, this is why some planets in Star Trek are known by names, and some by names and numbers.

5
  • 10
    Maybe because the name of every planet, once it's been through the Universal Translator, would come out as 'Earth' or 'Dirt' or something along those lines!
    – GordonD
    Sep 27 at 12:15
  • 7
    @GordonD "Here" and "Home" are also likely common candidates.
    – Shadur
    Sep 27 at 14:00
  • 7
    Note that scientists didn't duplicate the SF planet naming convention probably partly because the means we have of detecting planets doesn't know if it is the innermost planet or not. (In some cases we strongly suspect it is, like a super-jupiter-sized planet orbiting at the edge of the photosphere).
    – Yakk
    Sep 27 at 14:50
  • 6
    Real astronomical objects often accumulate catalog designations at a prodigious rate. The pulsar/symbiotic star GX1+4, discovered only 50 years ago, has 28 different catalog designations! So, real world astronomers are much less consistent than Star Trek.
    – John Doty
    Sep 27 at 16:09
  • 1
    @Shadur Fair point. Larry Niven's Known Space stories mention colony worlds like Home and We Made It.
    – GordonD
    Sep 28 at 15:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.