In the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "A Matter of Honor" Commander Riker participates in a Federation-Klingon officer exchange program. The evening before his transfer he gorges himself on Klingon delicacies, presumably to prepare his digestive tract for what's to come. Everything he eats--- heart of targ, pippius claw, gagh, etc. seems to have come from the living flesh of some animal. Onboard the Klingon vessel Pagh no one seems to eat anything but meat.

All this suggests the question: Are Klingons obligate carnivores? That is, do they require nutrients found only in animal flesh and therefore must eat meat to survive?

  • 3
    en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Prune_juice Commented Nov 22, 2012 at 21:49
  • 6
    Apparently not, Michael Dorn is a vegan.
    – NominSim
    Commented Nov 23, 2012 at 6:53
  • The two paragraphs seem to ask different questions. In the first it seems you want to know whether their diet consists exclusively of meat, but that's not the question you ask in the second. As some would say: Elaborate.
    – Junuxx
    Commented Nov 23, 2012 at 10:10
  • As a side note, startrek.com ran a "Ask a Klingon" column a few years ago. The Klingon in question was attached to the Klingon embassy on Earth. While he didn't think much of human food at first, he grew a great fondness for pork, which he wanted to bring to Qo'noS.
    – MPelletier
    Commented Nov 23, 2012 at 16:07
  • 5
    @Junuxx There is no question in the first paragraph, rather it establishes a preference for animal protein among the warrior class. I'm asking if this is a fundamental need of Klingons as a group, rather than an aesthetic choice, or a lifestyle, or a cultural preference.
    – Kyle Jones
    Commented Nov 23, 2012 at 17:00

3 Answers 3


I have come to the conclusion that Klingons are not obligate carnivores. I reached this conclusion by first observing that Klingons and humans are in fact the same species. From the Wikipedia article on species:

In the study of sexually reproducing organisms, where genetic material is shared through the process of reproduction, the ability of two organisms to interbreed and produce fertile offspring of both sexes is generally accepted as a simple indicator that the organisms share enough genes to be considered members of the same species. Thus a "species" is a group of interbreeding organisms.

In the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episode "Children of Time" we see the product of several generations of human-Klingon interbreeding with hybrids of both sexes present. According to the definition above, Klingons and humans despite morphological differences are "a group of interbreeding organisms" and thus are a single species.

Since humans aren't obligate carnivores, then neither are Klingons. If some Klingons have dietary preferences or restrictions due to excessive inbreeding or environmental pressures, then the traits are simple variations within the species rather than innate traits.

  • 9
    Ha. By that rate 90% of the races in the alpha quadrant, if not the galaxy, are of the same species.
    – Xantec
    Commented Jan 1, 2013 at 4:45
  • 3
    @KyleJones Infertile offspring aren't the only possibility for interspecies breeding, even just on Earth...
    – Izkata
    Commented Jan 1, 2013 at 4:55
  • 3
    We do know that Human-Okampa offspring are able to reproduce as well from Before and After. Also, the occasional female mule has produced offspring when bred to a pure-breed horse or donkey.
    – Xantec
    Commented Jan 1, 2013 at 5:30
  • 4
    I'm strongly against down voting except in specific reasons so I won't do it. But this is one of the most wrong answers I've ever read and it is baffling that it it green checked too. Commented May 29, 2021 at 20:37
  • 3
    "There is a technical definition of 'species' by which humans and Klingons are the same species. And we generally think of the word 'species' as meaning that there aren't any significant physical differences. Therefore, humans and Klingons do not have any significant physical differences." That's just silly. Commented May 30, 2021 at 18:43

It's difficult to say, they do eat a lot of meat (at least the warrior class does), though this is not definitive.

On this site I found reference to the fact that Klingons cannot absorb nutrients as easily as humans can, which means more live food (though not necessarily meat) in their diets rather than preserved foods.

This would explain a strong preference for (live) meat as opposed to non-meat foods or preserved meat, but probably not obligate carnivores.

  • 1
    I find that dubious. A major reason to cook food is to make it chemically easier to digest. Another to kill parasites. I'd suspect klingons treat everything like raw sushi because they prefer the taste and their stomach acid and enzymes can destroy everything. Commented May 29, 2021 at 20:31

If you're interested in things that only appeared in novels, A Burning House describes a popular Vulcan restaurant in First City on Qo'nos. (The Vulcans, as you probably know, are vegetarians). According to the Memory Beta page, it "catered largely to Vulcanoids in the Klingon Empire's capital city, but also had a share of Klingon customers".

This doesn't really answer whether Klingons can survive with no meat, but it does show that they can eat meals that aren't meat, and at least some of them enjoy it.

  • I don't really think this addresses the question. Humans are capable of eating grass but that's not the same as saying that they could survive on a cow's diet
    – Valorum
    Commented May 29, 2021 at 13:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.