73

During the time frame of the Lord of the Rings, was the Eye of Sauron Sauron's actual physical form? If not, what form did he have?

Eye of Sauron

  • 2
    Or is this the Eye of Sauron? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fomalhaut#/media/… Or, could it infact be the debris ring orbiting the star Formalhaut B? – maguirenumber6 Jan 13 '17 at 10:37
  • 2
    The eye is mostly writer's license taken from a few comments taken from the writings of Tolkien that have been mentioned by others here. Too much license? I believe not because when you think about it, Sauron himself is rather a poor villain. A far off dark lord who wears a fullhelm? No, that is hardly entertaining for a modern-day movie. What better than a fiery eye that haunts and hunts you from every direction, and when the ring is worn, a water effect silhouetted by fire? Well played, Pete, well played. – Hirschy Jun 27 '17 at 15:02
81

No, according to Tolkien himself Sauron had a physical form in the third age:

...in a tale which allows the incarnation of great spirits in a physical and destructible form their power must be far greater when actually physically present. ... Sauron should be thought of as very terrible. The form that he took was that of a man of more than human stature, but not gigantic. ~ The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien

The depiction of the Eye of Sauron shown in the cinematic releases of LOTR is not wholly absent in the books; Tolkien gives a description of it in The Fellowship of the Ring when Frodo spots it from the Mirror of Galadriel:

But suddenly the Mirror went altogether dark, as dark as if a hole had opened in the world of sight, and Frodo looked into emptiness. In the black abyss there appeared a single Eye that slowly grew, until it filled nearly all the Mirror. So terrible was it that Frodo stood rooted, unable to cry out or to withdraw his gaze. The Eye was rimmed with fire, but was itself glazed, yellow as a cat's, watchful and intent, and the black slit of its pupil opened on a pit, a window into nothing.

Despite the description, the Eye was only perceived by very few people in Middle-Earth, and did not have a physical worldly form, unlike Sauron.


In The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, the pupil of the great eye is shown to be the fiery silhouette of Sauron.

52

No - that's Peter Jackson's imagination at work a little bit too much, giving an overly simplistic and overly literal interpretation of things (although - perhaps understandably - it works well enough in the cinematic medium).

Here is a excerpt from an interview given by Michael Sragow of the Baltimore Sun with Peter Jackson. It was printed in a syndicated newspaper at 2001-12-19.

Q: As you were adapting the book, did you try to introduce at least two key elements of the plot simultaneously?

A: I certainly didn't want to fall into the trap of making the film too stately and too staid. The novel, for all its wonderfulness, is renowned among those readers who don't enjoy it as being dense and overly complicated and even ponderous. I wanted to give the movie a dynamic energy and a sense of momentum.
(…)
It's a big story, but also a great story with good characters — and not all are apparent at first reading. What's ultimately interesting about “The Lord of the Rings” is the villainy. Sauron is the ultimate dark lord figure, but you never see him — he takes the form of a flaming eyeball. And you know it's not going to be interesting to see, oh, Arnold Schwarzenegger square off against a flaming eyeball in the climax. The betrayer–wizard Saruman is a useful secondary villain, but he stays in his dark tower in this movie [i.e. “The Fellowship of the Ring”] and doesn't leave. We came to the realization, which is obvious, really, that the ring is the villain of the film. I treated the ring less as an object or prop and more as a potent character.

Going from that single quote, we could suppose that PJ genuinely thought that the Eye of Sauron was Sauron's physical form.

There is also http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/faq/sauronshape.html which does not quote PJ but does express a similar assessment.

Some citations from it:

He has only four (fingers) on the Black Hand, but they are enough.

So he's clearly got a hand for starters.

...the year 1000 of the Third Age, when the shadow of Sauron began first to grow again to new shape.

Confirms that there is a physical form but no indication of what it is.

Sauron should be thought of as very terrible. The form that he took was that of a man of more than human stature, but not gigantic.

Most telling of all, a description of his actual form.

So it's quite clear that Sauron's physical form is that of a tall man. As a Maia he was once, of course, able to take essentially any form he wished (and see Of Beren and Luthien for a description of him doing so, as well as his appearances among the elves as Annatar) but he lost much of that ability at the end of the Second Age.

  • 20
    In your second quote, I thought that might be referring to his metaphorical shadow, i.e. the influence of his power, not necessarily a literal shadow. – David Z Jun 26 '14 at 1:19
  • Can't find a quote right now so please someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember that Sauron lost the hability to switch appearences in some point. I think it's at the Fall of Númenor. – Jcheves May 8 '17 at 18:44
  • @Jcheves That's covered in this answer -- "he lost much of that ability at the end of the Second Age." – Mike Scott Jun 27 '17 at 15:05
17

I know there are other more complete answers posted above about Sauron's physical form, but some may not be aware that Tolkien himself painted an image of Sauron, the only one he ever made.

This is only a rough "first draft/concept" as it were, showing Sauron reaching out with the mountains of Mordor in the background, as he seems to appear to Aragorn and his forces at the conclusion of the battle of the Black Gate, before the west wind sweeps him away after the Ring is destroyed.

And as the Captains gazed south to the Land of Mordor, it seemed to them that, black against the pall of cloud, there rose a huge shape of shadow, impenetrable, lightning-crowned, filling all the sky. Enormous it reared above the world, and stretched out towards them a vast threatening hand, terrible but impotent: for even as it leaned over them, a great wind took it, and it was all blown away, and passed; and then a hush fell.

The Return of the King, Part 2, Chapter 4: The Field of Cormallen

It can't be known now whether he ever planned to revisit this and make a more complete version of the Dark Lord.

enter image description here

  • I very much doubt that this was intended to be a literal imagining of Sauron. – Valorum Mar 26 '16 at 19:10
  • 9
    As the only image Tolkien ever made of Sauron, I thought it might at least be of interest to some. If you think it's inappropriate, just say the word and it will be deleted. – maguirenumber6 Mar 26 '16 at 19:15
  • Nah, I'd just tidy it up a little to say something about the picture probably being meant figuratively – Valorum Mar 26 '16 at 19:38
  • 2
    I'll +1 in advance. This was interesting to me. Now it just needs a point of reference. :) – Major Stackings Mar 26 '16 at 20:48
  • 1
    This form of smoke was the visible shape of Sauron's spirit as it was released from his destroyed body and enfeebled by the destruction of the Ring. Compare with Saruman's similar end: "To the dismay of those that stood by, about the body of Saruman a grey mist gathered, and rising slowly to a great height like smoke from a fire, as a pale shrouded figure it loomed over the Hill. For a moment it wavered, looking to the West; but out of the West came a cold wind, and it bent away, and with a sigh dissolved into nothing." – Mark Olson Jun 28 at 21:21
7

I always had the impress that the eye of Sauron may be the palantir that Sauron used, or a a projection of it. Sauron had to have a physical form in order to use the ring of power.

  • 1
    Good answer, however, you need to give proper attribution to this quote. I.e, what book(s), chapter(s), author, etc. – turinsbane Jun 23 '16 at 17:37
0

Not sure if it's in the Hobbit or LotR, but when you see Sauron revealed in human form, as a dark/shadow figure, in the midst of flame, when the camera pans back, the dark figure looks like a cat's eye pupil in a flaming eye, which pans back to the eye of the dark figure, rinse and repeat.

So I'm not sure that the "eye" is actually a giant physical eye, as much as something that resembles an eye.

  • 1
    The movie, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug – David Roberts Feb 13 at 14:29
-1

" The spirit of Sauron endured" Gandalf says at the start of the Fellowship of the Ring. In other words, his body was destroyed by Isildur but his spirit endured as the One Ring endured hence why he appeared as a Great Eye. As Saruman suggested " He cannot yet take physical form" which suggested Sauron needed the One Ring to take physical form again as he had been destroyed physically when he lost it hence why he was desperate to find it.

  • 1
    Welcome to SFFSE! This answer is completely contradicted by another answer which quotes Tokien's own words. So, good effort, but perhaps try a question which doesn't have an accepted answer yet! Try reading the tour as well to help you get an idea of our community - you'll get a badge :D – Often Right Jul 27 '15 at 7:29
-1

In The Silmarillion Tolkien says that his body was lost in The War of the Last Alliance and that "the Eye of Sauron the Terrible few could endure" even before that loss of physical form.

protected by Kevin Jun 28 at 21:05

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.