Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
In The Matrix (and Animatrix), the machine city is called 01 (Zero One). From what I've read, this is the only city the machines have. If this is the first city built by machines, wouldn't it be called 00, since you typically start counting from zero in computer programming?
Was there a city before this one, which would have been "00"?
This is an interesting question, but you can't actually answer it.
There are simply too many possible factors and possibilities for both answers.
Just to name a few examples:
00 might be a reserved value. If the number is seen as an ID, a ID of 0 might denote a returned error or an illegal state (like "ID not set yet"). Another possibility would be the assignment to some core/critical/central (or previous) place.
Many languages start their indices at 0, but there are others starting at 1 as well. For example, the "first" byte in short strings in Pascal (index 0) stores the actual length of the string. The first character is at index 1.
Programming languages count as usual, i.e. if there's a count of 5, that means there are 5 elements. As such, it's possible that the first city receives the number 1, because now there are a total of 1 cities.
Maybe they weren't programmed in C (or a derivative) that uses array address offsets as indexes. Maybe they were written in Smalltalk or Lua.
Zero One (01) would be the binary equivalent of the number one (1). More than likely since they were machines, the binary number system would have been the way the machines communicated between each other. Because humans would have seen the "01" as "Zero One" that's probably how it was commonly pronounced while it was in existence. So while it looks like a number to us, to the machines, the numbers probably mean "First".
Hope this helps answer your question some.
Reference: The Binary Number System
0, not 1. 1 is only the smallest number, if you're lacking a concept of 0 (e.g. Roman numbers).
– Mario
Feb 3 '13 at 1:22
0. For example when talking about pointers, 0 usually represents the so called NULL pointer - an invalid value that essentially means "no valid pointer". So the first valid pointer (or memory index) is actually 1. However, there are instances where 0 would be the smallest valid number (and no reserved value for error checking), e.g. when talking about an array index. But as I said, that's really up to interpretation really (machine code and human reading).
– Mario
Aug 9 '13 at 23:12
The name "01" refers to the Machine City seen in the Animatrix segment the "Second Renaissance" and latterly in the film "Revolutions".We also see the online counterpart ("One Zero") in the Matrix Online game.
There is no canon reason to conclude that it was the second attempt to create a machine city.
Narrator: Banished from humanity, the machines sought refuge in their own promised land. They settled in the cradle of human civilization, and thus a new nation was born. A place the machines could call home, a place they could raise their descendants. And they christened the nation 'Zero One'.
In terms of elegant simplicity, there's no reason for the machines to call their city anything else. The name has connotation of binary (01 literally equals 1) and even the city flag functions as a logo;
Some of the answers come pretty close, but the real answer is that computers don't start counting with a zero. In C++ indexing an array with a[i] is just shorthand for give me the i-th element after the first one. So in this case you just count a different set of objects (those after the first) but zero has the proper meaning in this. If you stand on the first step of stair and do up 0 steps you are still at the first step.
Also, if you ask C how long a string is it will not return 0 for a single letter, it will return (correctly) 1.
Basically the rules of mathematics are the same for us and a computer, and starting counts with zero does not make any sense because you need to be able to count the elements in the empty set (zero) and differentiate this from a set with just one element.
The machines do whatever is efficient.
They "tend to count from zero" in our world because in the situation they count this is more efficient. In other situations, it may or may not be efficient to "reserve" the 00 for something else.
Even if they do not reserve it, where is the proof that machines use this name for their city internally? Maybe the name was made for humans (or maybe not). Also, Neo refer to it as "the machine city" instead.
Or maybe had not built another city before 01, maybe they refer to their life with the humans as "the initial state", 00. As often it is necessary to create a prototype to build a stable software from the ground-up afterwards (kind of "wiser after the event"), the machines may have seen their co-living with humans as a prototype of their existence, and gone to fix it's shortcomings into their "release city", 01 (incrementing the version number).
Either way, I find the interpretation of "the first" in 01 a human thing to do, machines most likely interpreted it differently. The nice symbiosis in this is, that while for humans 01 means "first", since, from a human point of view, this is the "first" city of its kind, being a machine city; from a machine point of view, it means (in human terms) "the second one". Most likely because they interpreted their living with the humans as their initial one (and in particular something that didn't work or needed a redesign).
It is very worth to note that after founding their own city and nation, the machines acted in attempt to coexist with humans: they produced vehicles for them for instance. From this point of view, it is not sure that they meant to name the city 01, they could mean "our way of life", as in "our way of life with humans as a dominant part of the environment, version 2.0" (01 in machine terms). But machines... doesn't waste bytes with storing all this and call it just 01. :)
