23

Related Questions:

When people dial a gate, they generally enter from the 'front' of the stargate. For convenience's sake on most planets, the 'front' of the gate is defined as the end that faces toward the DHD. Its also the side that has the 'kawoosh' splash out effect.

Even when 'space gates' were introduced in Atlantis, we get treated to a scene where some darts are guarding a gate, from only one side:

Wraith darts guarding a stargate in orbit

But what happens if an object entered from the 'back' (i.e., the other side) of an active gate?

Note: I'm not talking about incoming/outgoing directions. I'm assuming a "we dialed out, now we're gonna walk around the gate and enter from the wrong side" scenario.

  • 1
    I've wondered this myself in the past. It's very obvious that people cannot enter the Stargate from the other direction, but I don't personally understand the in-canon reason for this. I would assume that since the matter stream is only travelling in one direction, attempting to enter it from the wrong direction would be both unsuccessful and potentially harmful. Hopefully someone who understands the physics of the Stargate universe better than myself can take a look at your question, but I do know that it is definitely not possible to enter the 'Gate from the reverse-side. There are even case – James Sheridan Aug 16 '13 at 7:42
  • Related, but not duplicate: What happens to objects that enter a Stargate from the wrong side? ("wrong side" meaning "destination gate" in that question) – Izkata Aug 16 '13 at 10:56
  • @Izkata - I know, that's the one I referenced in my question ;-) – Robotnik Aug 16 '13 at 11:03
  • 1
    @Robotnik Oops. I woke up like 5 minutes before posting that and missed it hidden under the big pretty picture. >_< – Izkata Aug 16 '13 at 11:12
  • 3
    @Thaddeus - if that's true, and it is that dangerous at the back, why have it open to the air? Why not have a reverse iris, or back plating, or at least enclose some of it at the back, if the whirlpool phenomenon which Jack B Nimble talks about might happen. Its not like the Ancients retrofitted their cities, and left dangerous wires hanging everywhere, everything was designed from the ground up to be aesthetic and (relatively) safe. Usually the only problems that occurred happened because of Tau'ri meddling or interfacing – Robotnik Aug 17 '13 at 4:12
14

The tie-in novel SG1: Survival of the Fittest addresses this briefly.

"How about we just try it backwards?" Jack piped up again, though where he took the air from was anybody's guess. "Just because we've never done it before doesn't mean it won't-"
"I once knew a man who thought the same as O'Neill," Bra'tac reminisced dryly. "His death was most unpleasant."
"Thanks for clearing that one up, Bra'tac. What do we do? Carter?"

  • 4
    I have the strong feeling this conversation (although not the situation) was also in an episode; I remember it, but have never read any of the novels. – Izkata Aug 17 '13 at 5:23
  • I've taken the liberty of including the actual quote rather than just a synopsis. – Valorum Nov 7 '18 at 8:00
8

In the original Stargate movie we see a brief shot of the back of the Stargate just after it has been dialed.

enter image description here

We can see that the Stargate doesn't have the dialers on the back. It's surface appears to be fairly clean. Which shows there is definitely a front side. The shot then goes back to the front view, which shows the classic water surface effect that is in your screenshot. The back of the Stargate is presumably still a swirling spiral of water, focused down to a point (the point of the worm hole).

I imagine attempting to enter from the backside would be like trying to swim up through a whirlpool.

It could be figured that if you attempted to walk from the backside to the front side through the cone, you would be "pulled" backwards through the portal and out the "entrance" of the destination gate. Exiting from the backside of the gate would be impossible.

enter image description here

  • 1
    I would have to guess that the swirling whirlpool would act similarly to a kawoosh - matter interesecting it would be torn apart. Interestingly, a few times in the series we see stargates with the backs flush against another surface (notably when O'Neil was stranded in 100 Days). – Jeff Aug 16 '13 at 17:26
  • 3
    IIRC, the swirl on the back was dropped at some point early on in the series. I think it only reappeared when they first connected to the black hole and its gravity distorted the wormhole. – Izkata Aug 16 '13 at 23:27
  • 1
    Perhaps the vortex in the back is a symptom of non-optimal conditions; the wormhole itself being fine, but requiring more energy to overcome instability before settling into a usable state. – gate_engineer Aug 17 '13 at 3:11
  • 1
    @gate_engineer I'd buy that. The Earth gate was misaligned due to not having a DHD for so long, with Abydos and Tantalus being the only accessible gates... – Izkata Aug 17 '13 at 5:27
  • 2
    The vortex in the back doesn't stay there. If you watch the whole scene, the ka-woosh comes out the front, then you get the vortex in the back, then the vortex in the back subsides back into the "pool of water". The end result is (presumably) a flat pool on both sides. The overall effect is like the water is "stretching" back as the ka-woosh goes back into the gate. – Omegacron Feb 23 '15 at 21:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.