12

I have read all the main Sandman Comics, but I haven't found how he MISTAKENLY captured Dream. Dream, being such a powerful being (I was gonna say "creature" but decided against it!), was surely not easy to capture.

Throughout the series we have seen that even the extreme events against Dream have been somehow planned by him, or he has some knowledge of it. Could his capture be something he knew about, or planned? (Though, I can't see how this is possible?)

11

In Preludes and Nocturnes, in which Dream is captured, the reason for the mistake is not described. However, later in the Sandman series, during a flashback, Dream recalls his imprisonment, and hints that it occurred after a significant event, far from Earth, which he had attended. This event, or the lengthy journey back, had weakened him considerably, and he was returning in a vulnerable condition. It was only because of this vulnerability that the spell cast by Burgess was able to capture him, the implication being that it was a fluke that he was able to succeed even so far as getting one of the Endless at all. Death, it is implied, is far too powerful to fall to any mortal spell unless she deliberately limits her powers (which she does do occasionally; see Death: The High Cost of Living). It is also possible that the Magdalene Grimoire, the occult book used in the summoning ritual, was improperly employed, or that Burgess simply was not specific enough when he devised the ritual. Later stories employing the Magdalene Grimoire suggest that it is easily misused.

The question of intent is an interesting one. On the surface, Dream's capture was a simple accident, one he had to spend quite some time and effort to rectify. However, it was only because of his imprisonment that

his successor, Daniel, was brought into existence, by being gestated by Lyta Hall in the pocket dreamworld controlled by Brute and Glob.

As you had noticed, many events that seem random end up being used by Dream to his own ends. At the end of the series, when

Dream chooses to end his own existence by allowing the Furies to bring about his death, he seems aware that the child Daniel will take his place, as indicated by his gifting of the Eagle stone to Daniel before he departs. The duty-bound Dream may not have chosen to lay down his burden in the absence of a successor to pick it up.

Thus, the end of the series was dependent upon the beginning, an apparent accident and misfortune leading to the most powerful and pivotal event in the existence of the main character. I consider this both a highlight of Dream's foresight, and of the writing ability of Neil Gaiman. This arc also points out both Dream's strength and his weakness, for though he is powerful and timeless enough to foresee and use seemingly random events, ultimately he is not able to choose to step off of the path of consequences.

  • I believe the event in question was (spoilers) the confrontation with Hell over Dream's attempt to recover Nuala. – Christi Oct 9 '13 at 17:31
  • 1
    I was confused at this at first. Did you mean Nada, the mortal woman who refused a relationship with Dream? That story arc happened well after Dream escaped from Burgess' prison. – Metamaterial girl Oct 9 '13 at 18:14
  • I did. I think I'm getting bits of the story confused in my head. Don't mind me. – Christi Oct 9 '13 at 18:39
  • 1
    It's a lot of story to keep straight! The more I hunt for it, the more I think that the reason for Dream's fatigue before his capture isn't ever spelled out. Of course, Gaiman did tie-ins to other events in the DC universe that are hinted at in the Sandman series, so the answer may lie in another DC publication. – Metamaterial girl Oct 9 '13 at 18:50
  • 1
    For what it's worth, the story of Dream (as Kai'ckul) and Nada takes place chronologically in the distant past, even though the issues themselves didn't come out until after Preludes and Nocturenes – Monty129 Oct 9 '13 at 20:12
14
+50

Gaiman has announced that this question will be answered in the mini-series "The Sandman: Overture" with the first issue being released October 30th 2013. (2) So "it will all be revealed in a moment" so to speak.

Sandman: Overture image

Edit: Jeff asked for an update. Here goes: The answer by MetaMaterial Girl still stands. It is established in issue #1 of the Sandman that Burgess captured the wrong Endless and realized so immediately. It would seem that the ritual captures "an endless", without explaining how the right endless would be singled out. This is not addressed directly in "Overture"

What "Overture" adds is:

1) It establish that the endless can be summoned in ways they cannot avoid. (issue #1 of overture)

2) It explains why Morpheus was so tired he could not resist the call (a similar call in issue #1 was resisted for a long time)

3) It explains why Morpheus had to be captured. This is not spelled out explicitly, but consider this:

  • In Issue #1 of "Overture" he is confronted with a flaw in his personality. (ref conversation with sphinx-like Sandman)

  • His mother further confronts him with his flaws and makes him suffer for it

  • In the final issue, he is righting a wrong that he himself caused, which can also be traced to a personal flaw.

  • In the final issue he rights the wrong by making dreamers dream a new universe, exactly like in the story about when cats ruled the world, that you will recall from the main Sandman series. In the new universe, history is rewritten so that he never made that mistake. The mistake is the world that got consumed by a dream-vortex, which he refers to in the main Sandman series when Rose Walker herself becomes a dream-vortex.

  • As we know from the main series, he did not make the same mistake twice, but his personality, the ultimate cause, is left unchanged.

  • It is established in "Overture" that The Sandman is carried over unchanged into the new universe, being unique in this.

We can then see that the dreamers in the final issue of "Overtrue" not only dreamed a world where the dream-vortex never happened, but dreamed themselves a better Dream. They (and Morpheus) could not directly change him in the new universe, but could set actions in motion that would ultimately cause him to change.

TL;DR: Burgess' capture was due to a remake of the universe, that sought to create a better Dream.

  • 1
    Upvoted for some nice sleuthing! – Metamaterial girl Oct 9 '13 at 20:05
  • So...was it revealed? If so, an updated answer would go well. – Jeff May 9 '16 at 13:10
  • Done. Can anyone help me with the spoiler tag? :-) – Abulafia May 9 '16 at 14:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.