My book group wants a sci-fi book. They're all incredibly intelligent and educated people who are all incredibly well-read. I'm not worried about the fractured narrative of Banks' Use of Weapons, but I'm wondering if a reader can understand it without any prior Culture experience. It's been too long since I read them to separate out what I already knew.


3 Answers 3


I'd say yes, probably. There isn't much in it that assumes knowledge of the Culture - we are shown for example that Sma is a representative of this advanced civilization that interferes in other cultures, and that the protagonist is working for them. It's certainly much more newbie friendly than, say, Excession, which would be incomprehensible to a newcomer. (Come to think of it, Excession is pretty incomprehensible to everyone - its chronology is even more complicated than UoW.)

That's not to say that UoW is necessarily the best place to start. I'd recommend Player of Games, although that is less obviously "literary" so I understand why you want your bookclub to read UoW.

  • 2
    +1 - I also started with Player of Games - great introduction to the Culture world and my personal favourite of all his works. Nov 20, 2013 at 9:14
  • 1
    It seems this question involves a lot of subjectivity, given that I for one found Excession to be one of the most easily comprehensible Culture novels. (While reading it, I felt I could relate much better to the ship Minds and their "chatroom" culture in the described political turmoil than to various of the characters from the other books.) Apr 29, 2016 at 22:28

I've only recently read the Culture Novels, back to back, and personally found that they would have been served better with a different chronology.

I still think 'Consider Phlebas' is the best introduction to the 'Culture' as a species, because it lays all the basic framework: but if you look at some of the later novels, they don't even require this to function.

I agree with Daniel Roseman about The Player of Games being a workable introduction to the many nuances of the universe, it certainly does the best job of rendering the societal quirks of the Culture, as well as navigating the concept of Minds and Drones as having equal citizenship. It is perhaps one of the best novels to render the outlines of The Culture to newcomers.

Use of Weapons, however, is definitely Banks working at the pinnacle of literary form, surpassing even Excession. The fractured narrative, as you know, makes for a very challenging read alone, before you weigh in the fore-knowledge one is supposed to bring to the party when reading it. That said, it largely focuses on the very personal history of Zakalwe, so the peripheral Culture activities are largely secondary; although it does contain some sequences which paraphrase and extrapolate the general aims of The Culture, albeit in a rather diluted way.

A good balance between rendering the Culture's ideology and Banks' writing style is, I think, Inversions; although it's Medieval/Feudal scenario is somewhat removed from the Space exploring galaxy crossing activities of the rest of the Culture Books, so there is that huge void of content. It still functions as a good parable to explain the more philosophical arguments of interference/non-interference with developing cultures.

Matter has, I feel, sightly less gristle to its philosophical pondering, but certainly solves the lack of Culture Tech and Interface that many readers dismiss Inversions for.

In the end it comes down to what it is exactly you'd like to introduce your reading group to;

  • Are you trying to show off Banks' writing style, his use of non-linearity etc?
  • Are you trying to introduce them to the actual Culture in order to render it in totality?
  • Are you trying to pique their interest with something less straight forward, but that might lead them to look further into the cycle?

In summary I'd say; Yes, you could begin with Use of Weapons, without totally losing them. Banks is a good enough writer that he can hold any story together without the reader needing a codex, but it's likely some of the finer references/nuances would be lost.

The Idea of Minds/Drones and heir citizenship/participation is little discussed in Use Of Weapons. This wouldn't serve as a hindrance, per se, but without knowing such concepts there would perhaps be something lacking.

These are obviously just my opinions, and others have and will disagree. I'm just giving you the experience of someone who has very recently read the novels, so do with this as you will.

Hope this Helps..

  • 3
    I generally agree but would say that Inversions is not a Culture Novel unless you know the Culture from other stories.
    – mart
    Nov 21, 2013 at 12:31
  • I know what you mean, I tried to elucidate that in my answer; but it is listed as a Culture novel, and features Culture agents. I think it actually explains the Cultures methodology very well, by removing the action from the 'Culture' Universe however you do get a lot of people claiming it isn't a Culture series book: but it definitely is, its just very very different... Nov 21, 2013 at 12:34
  • it definitly is, but you need to know the culture beforehand to understand this.
    – mart
    Nov 21, 2013 at 14:53

For an accessible entrance to the Culture universe, Look To Windward would fit the bill. A bit more of a space opera than Use of Weapons, it does not assume much knowledge of the Culture world, and it is also less dark (although being a Banks book, it is plenty dark at times). It is also a great introduction to the minds and ships of the culture. It has plenty of action, and is not lacking in characteristic humour. In terms of pacing, it moves along more rapidly than UoW, but in narrative complexity, it is definitely more straightforward.

  • Look to Windward has a few references to events in Consider Phlebas, so I would read that first or some of the events in LTW will be less meaningful.
    – user22478
    Feb 5, 2018 at 22:23
  • I'd agree except i don't consider consider phlebas to be the best of the culture series; better to start on a really good one? Feb 7, 2018 at 2:19
  • Hmm have to disagree with you on that one, Consider Phlebas is my favourite - but it was also the first Culture novel I ever read so I'm probably biased!
    – user22478
    Mar 10, 2018 at 1:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.