6

How did Stark manage to create a new element after Jarvis said it was impossible to synthesise the atom? Or did I miss something?

Improve this question
3
  • 13
    Movie nonsense. Artistic license, etc...
    – geoffc
    Nov 29, 2013 at 0:23
  • 2
    Didn't he have a snarky reply to Jarvis after that, as he got to work on it?
    – Izkata
    Nov 29, 2013 at 0:27
  • I don't see why it takes movie nonsense or artistic license for Jarvis to be wrong.
    – Lèse majesté
    Nov 29, 2013 at 11:08

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
10

JARVIS was using its existing knowledge & analysis on Vibranium structure given by Tony's father. And then, human brain came in. Tony Stark synthesized Vibranium using his table-top particle accelerator (not sure it was portable LHC, but it was impressive).

Improve this answer
20
  • 3
    Note that we regularly synthesize transuranic elements with particle accelerators, so the idea isn't without merit. What made it silly was the scale and the hand-hacked nature of it. And that Tony wasn't being cooked while the thing was running.
    – John Bode
    Nov 29, 2013 at 15:46
  • 7
    This is how the movie explains it. In reality he could have created a new element this way, but, creating a new atom on a Particle Accelerator only produces a few unstable atoms that tend to disapear (revert back to regular-known elements or shatter into subatomic crap) after a few seconds. The movie implies that he somehow managed to transmute an element to another using the particle beam.
    – Chepech
    Nov 29, 2013 at 20:15
  • So using a particle accelerator to collide particles to create new ones is different to testing the results made from multiple permutations and combinations of existing ones? (which is what Jarvis calculated)
    – Reanimation
    Dec 15, 2013 at 0:15
  • @Reanimation JARVIS used Earth based knowledge of particle physics which is far from perfect (you can't really calculate anything for probability-driven quantum world & that's why we need LHC experiments) to calculate an alien element.
    – Satellite of Sin
    Dec 15, 2013 at 0:52
  • 2
    @SachinShekhar: We can calculate new elements perfectly well. Indeed perfectly easily since it's simple addition: add one to the highest atomic number. We need particle accelerators to make the element EXIST - hence confirming our calculations. Without things like the LHC, all those calculations are just a bunch of chalk marks on the blackboard (or ink on paper, or bits in memory). The search for the Higgs Boson for example was a "search" - meaning trying to find something we think we know. Not actually discovering an unknown.
    – slebetman
    Nov 10, 2014 at 2:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.