7

At the end of The Angels Take Manhattan, we see a surviving Weeping Angel taking Rory away right outside the TARDIS. Then Amy lets herself be touched by the Angel to join Rory in the past.

What troubles me is that both The Doctor and River were standing right there and witnessed the whole thing. Why didn't The Doctor just stare at the Angel and tell River to get Amy inside the TARDIS to save her?

17

I've redacted the transcript to just highlight the important bits. The short answer is that neither Amy or River are especially keen on the idea of leaving Rory on his own in the past. Both of them are (rightly) convinced that if she lets the Angel touch her, she'll rejoin her husband.

Although the Doctor is sad about this (as well as worried about her personal safety since he's unsure where/when she'll turn up), he has no intention of physically stopping her from making her own decision.

The Angel standing behind RORY touches him and he disappears.

......

DOCTOR: I'm sorry, Amelia. I'm so, so sorry.

AMY: No. No, we can just go and get him in the TARDIS. One more paradox.

DOCTOR: Would rip New York apart and I --

...

With shuddering breaths, AMY walks towards the Angel.

DOCTOR: Amy? What are you doing?

...

AMY: The Angel, would it send me back to the same time, to him?

DOCTOR: I don't know. Nobody knows.

AMY: (takes a step closer) But it's my best shot, yeah?

AMY: It'll be fine. I know it will. I'll -- I'll be with him, like I should be. Me and Rory, together. Melody. (holds her hand out behind her)

...

AMY: (sobs) Raggedy man, (turns to the DOCTOR) goodbye. (disappears)

  • 1
    Yeah, I've seen the episode a few times. By the second run I wondered why The Doctor wouldn't try to stop Amy or the Angel itself. I agree that River engouraged her to go, so maybe she wouldn't have helped. But The Doctor didn't want to let Amy go, he could have just stared at the Angel while trying to convince her, couldn't he? – tilley31 Jan 24 '14 at 21:50
  • 2
    Ah, but he knows that she's right. The reason he's so upset is that he's suddenly realised that in less than a minute (just when things were becoming quite stable between the three of them) she'll be out of his life forever. – Valorum Jan 24 '14 at 21:56
  • That said, there's probably a reason that that's the last time we hear about the Angels. – Shadur Aug 29 at 11:21
13

Why didn't The Doctor just stare at the Angel and tell River to get Amy inside the TARDIS to save her?

Good question. While I personally consider the curmudgeon's answer (i.e., "the writers messed up") to be the best one to cover that entire episode, there are a few intriguing possibilities.

  • After time suffering so many pardoxes, the Doctor was becoming essentially "allergic" to the ponds. Similar to how he cannot bear to look at Captain Jack Harkness, the repeated "wrongness" that Amy carries with her was, by this point, more than he could stand and still think clearly. (This also neatly answers "why didn't he just walk to New York". It's not impossible for, say, River to do so -- it's something that the Doctor simply cannot physiologically endure.)

  • The Doctor knows that Amy loves Rory, and that he cannot stand in the way of his friend's last chance to spend her life with her one true love. (See @Richard's answer for more on this.)

  • Clara distracted him, as part of her appearing throughout his timeline to help steer him towards her continuity. (If the Doctor doesn't lose Amy, he doesn't sulk. If he doesn't sulk, he doesn't meet the GI and Clara.)

    And without Clara, he doesn't save Galifrey.

  • The Doctor is lying, and has known for some time that this is where he leaves Amy and Rory. He's not crying out of fear; he's crying because, once she goes to NY without him, she's no longer his companion.

  • 3
    I like the Clara theory. I'd upvote if I had the rep. – tilley31 Jan 25 '14 at 0:01
  • 1
    "Rule no. 1, The Doctor Lies" – Memor-X Jul 9 '14 at 5:29
3

It's easier than that - Amy stepped between the angel and the doctor. He couldn't see the angel. She blocked his view with her body. But River knew that it was the right thing to do so she blinked - for Amy. River was willing to give up both of her parents just so they could spend their lives together.

2

Perhaps it's a also that The Doctor read the name of the last chapter of River's book, which I believe was "Amy's Goodbye". He clearly believes that everything in the book must happen, as can be see by how River must break her own wrist earlier in the episode to free herself. Now that he sees how Amy is definitely saying goodbye to him, wouldn't he realize that it all fits in to place and not try to stop her? He is sad but realizes it was already destined to happen, according to River's book.

1

The short answer was that the Doctor was aware that Amy and Rory in the past had become a fixed point in time. This happens when he reads the chapter name "Amelia's Last Farewell"

So he could do nothing to change that except play it out. Although he tried to prevent the fixed point by refusing to break Rivers wrist to free her. River then breaks her own wrist, thus fulfilling the storyline of the book.

There was also a fan theory for that season that the episodes were running in reverse order in relation to the doctors timeline. So a lot of the actions the doctor takes in earlier episodes is because of the outcome in Manhattan.

This is certainly the case with River's timeline and she was the one who also told her to be with Rory.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.