I first read this book around 1983-1985 (no actual idea of when it was first printed), and, while I can't remember all that much from the book itself (other than enjoyable), I do remember the cover of the book. The cover prominently featured and depicted a robot, silver in color, sitting down (maybe in a field of some sort?), drinking a cup of tea in a very posh 'pinky extended' fashion.

I've brought this fact up to friends, who have also read the book (and who are also trying to remember the book), and they always come back with 'Douglas Adam's: The Long Dark Teatime of the Soul.' I am pretty sure this is not correct, for a quick GIS of that book, shows no covers bearing what I remember.

A small, small part of me, thinks it was a Heinlein book, but, none of the covers look familiar, I imagine it's possible the changed cover on a re-print, but, none of the titles stick out to me either.

Any help, and all the internets to you, if you find this book!

  • Long Dark Teatime of the Soul makes no sense. The only robot was an android, basically indistinguishable from a human. – Valorum Jan 31 '14 at 16:56
  • 2
    @Richard That was the monk in Dirk Gently. There's no robot in Teatime. – Mr Lister Jan 31 '14 at 20:44
  • Oops. Getting my books mixed up. Teatime was the one with the Act of God (but which God, and why?) :-) – Valorum Jan 31 '14 at 21:09
  • Oh dear, so long ago. Ehm, a new and powerful Guilt God? – Mr Lister Feb 1 '14 at 13:04
  • 1
    This is another book cover by Bob Norrington of a robot drinking out of a dainty floral tea cup. – Simon Jones Jul 9 '15 at 18:12

Special Deliverance by Clifford Simak?


It sounds like the book you're after is Special Deliverance by Clifford D. Simak, originally published in 1982.

Special Deliverance

The cover art was by Michael Whelan

  • 1
    Richard, you have done this fellow human being a grand service. Thank you, so, so much. If I could upvote this answer a thousand times, I would. – Jasoomian Jan 31 '14 at 21:42
  • 1
    One is glad to be of service – Valorum Jan 31 '14 at 21:53
  • 4
    @Jasoomian if this answer nailed it, please mark it as accepted. – terdon Feb 1 '14 at 5:28
  • 4
    Richard, was yours an 'original' answer, or just an expansion of mine? – ImaginaryEvents Feb 1 '14 at 12:42
  • 2
    @Richard - personally I think identification questions are a special (and less interesting) case of general questions on sites like this, where the better answer is the first correct one, not necessarily the most detailed. There are of course edge cases to this - but the work is done in identifying the novel/story etc. You are correct in the more general question sense that detail, references etc are good things to add. I doubt people are downvoting "because its more detailed" - that in itself is a good thing. – iandotkelly Feb 1 '14 at 15:29

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.