She says it's to contain the infection, but she also must have known that everyone she killed would have been reanimated. I mean what's worse than a thousand people infected with a deadly disease? A thousand undead people infected with the same disease, who have no ability to think and insatiable desire to feed. It seems like it would have been much more effective if she just locked down the facility and allowed everyone to live.

  • 2
    Locking it down and not killing everyone would have left the possibility of someone finding a way to disable her or the locks. At this point, the infected show no cognitive abilities. Killing them leaves the lowest chance of any infected subjects making it to the surface.
    – phantom42
    Feb 19, 2014 at 20:01

2 Answers 2


The original script by Paul Anderson gives a pretty good description of the Red Queen's decision-making process. I've edited for clarity.

RED QUEEN: I was trying to keep them isolated, but I'm afraid you've changed all that.

TWELVE : Why kill everyone in the Hive?

RED QUEEN : Because there was a leak. T—3 escaped an unplanned pattern of infection began. Once the virus was loose, I couldn’t allow anyone to leave the Hive. So I took the appropriate action.

SPENCE : You butchered them.

RED QUEEN : If one infected human had escaped from the Hive the infection would have spread to cover the United States within 13 days, Canada and South America in 27 days [and] worldwide infection in less than two months. So I took steps.

It's pretty clear that the zombies are actually quite well-contained (electronic locks, deep underground with only a single elevator shaft and an armoured railway tunnel to get in/out) until Alice and her commandos break in and shut down the power, against the Red Queen's explicit advice and warnings...

Red Queen

  • I believe a somewhat abridged version of this did make it into the actual movie.
    – Kevin
    Feb 19, 2014 at 20:17
  • @Kevin - Yes, it does; script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/r/… but it doesn't go into the level of detail, it just says she can't let anyone infected leave the hive
    – Valorum
    Feb 19, 2014 at 20:19
  • 3
    I was going to add my own answer, but honestly it would just end up saying the same thing as this. As much emphasis was placed on the Red Queen being "homicidal", it really does seem that she made the best decision under the circumstances. This point is made by her "sister" the White Queen in the third movie.
    – Omegacron
    Feb 19, 2014 at 20:21
  • 2
    @Omegacron - I agree that her actions are cold-blooded but totally rational.
    – Valorum
    Feb 19, 2014 at 20:23

Although created by the Umbrella Corporation, I do not believe the Red Queen to be evil. Umbrella never intended for the T-Virus to be released within the Hive, so she was programmed to preserve life. When the virus got released into the ventilation systems of the Hive she took steps by eradicating and detaining all those infected so that the virus wouldn't reach a populated area. Upon realizing what had happened, Umbrella took steps to override the red queen, corrupting her and releasing the undead and the virus into Raccoon city above the facility.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.