I haven't read the books for many years, so I don't remember the exact reasons, but looking at this LOTR Timeline on lotrproject.com, I see that Frodo inherited the Ring on 23 September TA 3001, but he doesn't start his adventure until TA 3018.

Is there any reason why he didn't start off earlier?


6 Answers 6


Because 17 years earlier, Gandalf had no more than a pretty firm suspicion that Frodo's ring might possibly be the One Ring—even though Saruman had denied this was possible. He told Frodo:

"[The Ring] may have other powers than just making you vanish when you wish to."

"I don't understand," said Frodo.

"Neither do I," answered the wizard. "I have merely begun to wonder about the ring, especially since last night."

(The Fellowship of the Ring, Book I, Chapter 1, "A Long-Expected Party")

Gandalf had been alarmed by Bilbo's reaction to the suggestion of giving up the ring, and by his description of feeling "thin and stretched"; and most of all by Bilbo's use of the term "precious" to describe it. He felt that it was important to do research into the ring—research which he summarizes for Frodo in Chapter 2 of Book I, and for the Council of Elrond in Chapter 2 of Book II.

@Alfe asked why Gandalf took 17 years to find the answer to whether this was the One Ring or not, especially given the possible danger to Frodo and the Shire generally.

It appears that Gandalf had at some point after Bilbo's return in 2941 been suspicious enough to request that the Dunedain set a guard on the Shire—we're not told when, as far as I can discover, but Gandalf does tell Frodo in "The Shadow of the Past",

Even when I was far away there has never been a day when the Shire has not been guarded by watchful eyes.

(The Fellowship of the Ring, Book I, Chapter 2, "The Shadow of the Past")

After Bilbo's departure in 3001, Gandalf felt sufficiently alarmed that he consulted with Aragorn and had the guard doubled. Furthermore, he and Aragorn seem to have decided that the best way to decide whether Frodo's ring was The Ring was to try and connect the dots from Isildur to Gollum by finding where Gollum got his ring, and when. This of course would require finding Gollum:

'And I,' said Aragorn, 'counselled that we should hunt for Gollum, too late though it may seem. And since it seemed fit that Isildur's heir should labour to repair Isildur's fault, I went with Gandalf on the long and hopeless search.'

Then Gandalf told how they had explored the whole length of Wilderland, down even to the Mountains of Shadow and the fences of Mordor. There we had rumour of him, and we guess that he dwelt there long in the dark hills; but we never found him, and at last I despaired.

(The Fellowship of the Ring, Book II, Chapter 2, "The Council of Elrond")

No wonder he despaired. Wilderland is not specifically defined anywhere, it's not a country; but it appears from the maps in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings that Wilderland is the strip of land east from the Misty Mountains as far as the Lonely Mountain in the north, and south apparently as far as Rohan; and then southeast from there to the borders of Mordor. That's a strip of land maybe five hundred miles long north to south and a hundred or a hundred and fifty west to east; a piece of land the size of the U.S. state of New York or bigger, being searched by two people, looking for an individual—known to be good at hiding—who had last been seen about fifty years previously. No wonder it took them seventeen years; the wonder is that they didn't give up earlier!

Gandalf gave up before Aragorn, and figured out another way to identify the Ring (by the inscription on the Ring) in early 3018. Just as he was setting out for the Shire, he heard that Aragorn had caught Gollum, and went to interrogate him. It was only after that that Gandalf felt completely free of doubt. Even then, after he came up to talk to Frodo, he wanted to verify his ideas based on the inscription clue he had discovered:

I still do not know, one might say. There is a last test to make. But I no longer doubt my guess.

(This, and all further quotes, from The Fellowship of the Ring, Book I, Chapter 2, "The Shadow of the Past")

And when Frodo asks, "Why did you let me keep it? Why didn't you make me throw it away, or, or destroy it?" Gandalf replies,

you must remember that nine years ago [i.e. in 3008, seven years after the Party], when I last saw you, I still knew little for certain.

So that explains why Gandalf waited until 3018; he just didn't feel certain enough. As far as why he allowed Frodo to wait until the fall of that year, it appears that first of all he wasn't sure that there was an immediate, pressing danger—he didn't realize how closely the Nazgûl were pursuing the Ring; and secondly, he didn't want to push Frodo too much. He did wish that Frodo took the threat more seriously:

"You ought to go quietly, and you ought to go soon," said Gandalf. Two or three weeks had passed, and still Frodo made no sign of getting ready to go.

But he was willing to make a compromise about the departure time:

He looked at Frodo and smiled. "Very well," he said. "I think that will do—but it must not be any later. I am getting very anxious."

By the end of June, he discovers from Radagast (sent by Saruman) that the Nazgûl have crossed the Anduin and are searching for the Ring. He wants Frodo to go immediately at that point. But Radagast also conveys Saruman's request for Gandalf to consult with him, and of course as soon as Gandalf goes, he gets captured. Gandalf does have a plan in place before leaving for Isengard; he writes a letter informing Frodo of the danger, and push him out of the Shire sooner, but he leaves his letter to Frodo in the hands of Barliman Butterbur, who loses track of it; and thus Frodo's departure doesn't in the end take place for another three months.

  • 2
    Do you also have an explanation why Gandalf needed 17 years to get the necessary information? After all if this was the One Ring, it meant a terrible danger, left in the Hobbit's hands, and a quicker response would probably have softened the problem a bit. (I mean instead of waiting until the Nazgûl are riding again or similar.)
    – Alfe
    Commented Aug 5, 2014 at 22:32
  • 47
    @Alfe - he filed a Freedom Of Information request with Federal Government. 17 years sounds about right. Also, this was before Google. Commented Aug 6, 2014 at 1:10
  • 2
    @Alfe: Tracking down Gollum could have taken several years. Gandalf probably had other things to do and leads to investigate. All that combined with the slow speed of travel could add up to 17 years. Commented Aug 6, 2014 at 5:35
  • 2
    @Alfe, though the consequences may be earth-shaking, he may have seen the chances as extremely low. A hobbit would be the "unlikeliest of creatures" to possess the Ring of Power. Had Gandalf been more sure to start with, he may have been more urgent. There are a lot of problems in Middle-earth. Commented Aug 6, 2014 at 21:27
  • 3
    Gandalf does not have an 'instinctive reaction to consult Saruman'. This is only how the film portrays things. In the books, Gandalf is met by Radagast outside Bree. Radagast tells Gandalf about the Nazgul and advises him to seek Saruman's council.
    – shea
    Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 23:41

Unlike the movie, in the books Gandalf is not certain of the Ring's origins when Frodo inherits it. He simply asks Frodo to keep the Ring a secret, and it's only when he returns 17 years later and asks Frodo to destroy it that Frodo is forced to leave.

  • 12
    The movie does show gandalf being suspicious first, then researching, then returning to test the ring. the movie doesn't give a sense that 17 years passed, but it does give a sense that some time passed, be that days or months or years
    – PeterL
    Commented Aug 5, 2014 at 17:25
  • True, and it actually could have been 17 years. Frodo and company wouldn't really look much different.
    – JMD
    Commented Aug 5, 2014 at 17:26
  • 1
    Then my question is why'd it take so long for Gandalf to find his answers to his suspicions? In the movie after Bilbo's speech at the party, he puts on the ring and high-tails it back to his house, only to find Gandalf already there, indicating Gandalf's teleportation power.
    – coburne
    Commented Aug 5, 2014 at 17:39
  • 2
    @coburne good question. In the books Gandalf doesn't exhibit any teleportation, so my assumption is it's a liberty taken to make Gandalf seem more mysterious. This question in itself could certainly be its own post. I feel like there's a lot to explore there.
    – JMD
    Commented Aug 5, 2014 at 17:41
  • 14
    Gandalf didn't only spend that time looking for answers, he also spent it looking for Gollum. (And he spent way too much time on horseback in the movie to be able to teleport. Being twice as tall as a hobbit and in better shape, he just made it up the hill to Bag End faster.)
    – Plutor
    Commented Aug 5, 2014 at 18:03

Gandalf had suspicions that the ring may be the one ring. So first he went verified some details about the ring before coming back to Frodo. Then after his suspicions were confirmed Frodo first took about 6 months- 1 year selling bag end moving the other side of the shire before finally starting his quest. There was not an initial rush for Frodo to get to Rivendell. because they wanted to mask the fact that he had the ring. (Frodo also changes his name to mr. Underhill)


As ZenLogic and JMD mention, Gandalf did not know what the ring was until 17 years later. Even then, Frodo does not leave at once. After Gandalf shares what it is, he tells Frodo to prepare to leave soon, and if he does not return or feels threatened to go ahead and leave. It is several months after Frodo last sees Gandalf before he actually leaves Bag End. He takes the time to prepare, sells Bag End to Lobelia Sackville Baggins, and actually begins to travel.

Even then, he wasn't planning to leave the Shire immediately. He had intended to remain in the home he purchased in Crickhollow until Gandalf came back. It is only after encountering Black riders on their initial journey and hearing about Farmer Maggot and the Gaffer's encounters with black riders that he decides to remain in Crickhollow only one night and they set off the next morning through the hedge.

Further, Gandalf never asked Frodo to destroy the One Ring. It wasn't even until the council at Rivendell that this was decided.


Gandalf didn't know it was the one ring at first, he had to go and find out if it actually was. He initially tried to find Gollum, that did not work out so well, the answer only came when he went to Minas Tirith and read a scroll written by Isildur (that was when he found out about the inscription and that it would only show up after being exposed to strong enough heat). When he confirms this, he sends Frodo off to Rivendell almost imediately.

  • And why does it take Gandalf 17 years to accomplish this? After all, if it is the One Ring, the danger would have been to grave that a faster reaction would seem appropriate.
    – Alfe
    Commented Aug 5, 2014 at 22:28
  • 4
    Positively identifying a multi-thousand year old object missing for thousands of years in a society where record-keeping is done in hand written notes isn't all that easy. Try reading a hand written English document that is just a few hundred years old to compare.
    – Oldcat
    Commented May 22, 2015 at 18:13

He was essentially researching. I think the above commenters have covered things pretty well, but in response to the people questioning why it took 17 years, that's a pretty short time in the scheme of things, and also research takes a lot of time when horse is the fastest travel you can muster and you don't have a computer letting you search sources and telling you where the texts are that you're looking for, not to mention people. Gandalf isn't Eru. He's not all powerful or all knowing, and so for him to gather information it would take a significant amount of time.

  • 2
    Hi, welcome to SF&F! As you recognize, your answer doesn't add much to the existing answers, and might have been better left as a comment. You should check out the help on How to Answer and take the tour.
    – DavidW
    Commented Apr 4, 2019 at 19:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.